 | | From: | Mark Fox | | Subject: | Re: Ritter Right About Iraq | | Date: | 23 Jan 2005 20:58:24 -0800 |
|
|
 |
Sid9 wrote:
> Osprey wrote:
> > "Frank Dwyer" wrote in message
> > news:5yZId.1646$b74.822@news02.roc.ny...
> >> Sid9 wrote:
> >>
> >>> Mark Fox wrote an irrelevance:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> These are FACTS independent of
> >>> Ritter that tell us about the incompetence
> >>> and lack of judgment of Yosemite George
> >>>
> >>> Saddam was no threat to anyone.
> >>
> >> No one outside of his own country.
> >
> > It depends I think. If he was financing terrorism, which we know
he
> > was..at least with suicide bombers, or allowing terrorist networks
to
> > come into Iraq and use the land to train or set up base.
> >
> >>
> >>> Saddam was neutered.
> >>
> >> Yup
> >>
> >>> Saddam was contained.
> >>
> >> Yup
> >>
> >>> Saddam had no air force.
> >>
> >> Minimal at best.
> >
> > Or what was buried under the sand.
> >
> >>
> >>> Saddam had only the remnants of air defense.
> >>
> >> Yup
> >>
> >>> Saddam had UN inspectors all over Iraq with freedom to go
anywhere
> >>> unannounced.
> >>
> >> Wrong
> >
> > Correct, remember they were booted out when Clinton was in office
and
> > for a long time Saddam was going unchecked.
> >
>
>
> You have a convenient incorrect memory to support your case.
>
> Inspectors had returned.
> Saddam was desperate.
> Yosemite George's attack was imminent.
> Saddam caved.
>
> *Inspectors entered Iraq, unfettered.*
> They could visit his palaces....in fact any place with no advanced
warning
> to anybody.
>
> Then when Bush threatened to start bombing Iraq the inspectors left
in one
> big hurry for their personal safety from American bombs.
>
> There was *NO* valid reason for this war
The UN Security Council and the United States Congress says there was a
valid reason.
|
|
| | From: | David W. Barnes | | Subject: | Re: Ritter Right About Iraq | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:59:41 -0800 |
|
|
| In article <1106542704.288916.15080@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, Mark
Fox wrote:
> Sid9 wrote:
> > Osprey wrote:
> > > "Frank Dwyer" wrote in message
> > > news:5yZId.1646$b74.822@news02.roc.ny...
> > >> Sid9 wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Mark Fox wrote an irrelevance:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> These are FACTS independent of
> > >>> Ritter that tell us about the incompetence
> > >>> and lack of judgment of Yosemite George
> > >>>
> > >>> Saddam was no threat to anyone.
> > >>
> > >> No one outside of his own country.
> > >
> > > It depends I think. If he was financing terrorism, which we know
> he
> > > was..at least with suicide bombers, or allowing terrorist networks
> to
> > > come into Iraq and use the land to train or set up base.
> > >
> > >>
> > >>> Saddam was neutered.
> > >>
> > >> Yup
> > >>
> > >>> Saddam was contained.
> > >>
> > >> Yup
> > >>
> > >>> Saddam had no air force.
> > >>
> > >> Minimal at best.
> > >
> > > Or what was buried under the sand.
> > >
> > >>
> > >>> Saddam had only the remnants of air defense.
> > >>
> > >> Yup
> > >>
> > >>> Saddam had UN inspectors all over Iraq with freedom to go
> anywhere
> > >>> unannounced.
> > >>
> > >> Wrong
> > >
> > > Correct, remember they were booted out when Clinton was in office
> and
> > > for a long time Saddam was going unchecked.
> > >
> >
> >
> > You have a convenient incorrect memory to support your case.
> >
> > Inspectors had returned.
> > Saddam was desperate.
> > Yosemite George's attack was imminent.
> > Saddam caved.
> >
> > *Inspectors entered Iraq, unfettered.*
> > They could visit his palaces....in fact any place with no advanced
> warning
> > to anybody.
> >
> > Then when Bush threatened to start bombing Iraq the inspectors left
> in one
> > big hurry for their personal safety from American bombs.
> >
> > There was *NO* valid reason for this war
>
> The UN Security Council and the United States Congress says there was a
> valid reason.
Neither said that - but keep trying.
|
|
| | From: | Ray Fischer | | Subject: | Re: Ritter Right About Iraq | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:24:05 GMT |
|
|
| Mark Fox wrote:
>Sid9 wrote:
>> You have a convenient incorrect memory to support your case.
>>
>> Inspectors had returned.
>> Saddam was desperate.
>> Yosemite George's attack was imminent.
>> Saddam caved.
>>
>> *Inspectors entered Iraq, unfettered.*
>> They could visit his palaces....in fact any place with no advanced
>warning
>> to anybody.
>>
>> Then when Bush threatened to start bombing Iraq the inspectors left
>in one
>> big hurry for their personal safety from American bombs.
>>
>> There was *NO* valid reason for this war
>
>The UN Security Council and the United States Congress says there was a
>valid reason.
Mark Fox is a liar. The UN security council REFUSED to condone any
invasion of Iraq. When Bush couldn't get the votes he bypassed them
and invaded anyway.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
|
|
| | From: | David W. Barnes | | Subject: | Re: Ritter Right About Iraq | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:21:42 -0800 |
|
|
| In article , Ray Fischer
wrote:
> Mark Fox wrote:
> >Sid9 wrote:
>
> >> You have a convenient incorrect memory to support your case.
> >>
> >> Inspectors had returned.
> >> Saddam was desperate.
> >> Yosemite George's attack was imminent.
> >> Saddam caved.
> >>
> >> *Inspectors entered Iraq, unfettered.*
> >> They could visit his palaces....in fact any place with no advanced
> >warning
> >> to anybody.
> >>
> >> Then when Bush threatened to start bombing Iraq the inspectors left
> >in one
> >> big hurry for their personal safety from American bombs.
> >>
> >> There was *NO* valid reason for this war
> >
> >The UN Security Council and the United States Congress says there was a
> >valid reason.
>
> Mark Fox is a liar. The UN security council REFUSED to condone any
> invasion of Iraq. When Bush couldn't get the votes he bypassed them
> and invaded anyway.
They must be listening to Fox "NEWS"
|
|
