From:	Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,464 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!
Subject:	Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 04:24:14 GMT

Jay Sekulow is an accomplished lawyer, and he and his
Anti-ACLU outfit, the "ACLJ," have even argued cases before
the U.S. Supreme Court. (Almost **always** AGAINST personal
liberties.)

So -- even though he's **misguided** and **hateful** enough
to be an RRR cultist... he is NOT an ignorant person.

But whenever he WHINES about same- marriage, he uses
this SAME phrase over and over again: "unelected judges"...
"unelected judges"... "unelected judges"... "unelected judges"...
ad nauseum.

A phrase you'll NEVER hear him utter is: "checks and balances."

(That would be HONEST!)

AS an accomplished lawyer, he KNOWS that the Constitution
purposely **calls** for appellate court judges TO be appointed!
It's a fundamental and constitutional part of our system!

So he's either an ignoramus... which we've ruled out -- OR he's a
LIAR, for directly implying that the judges in Massachusetts who
declared the INCLUSION of same- couples in marriage to be
constitutional got there IMPROPERLY. And that they didn't have
the RIGHT to interpret the Constitution in that manner.

The RRR ***counts*** on its being able to pander to the small
percentage of the population that is profoundly ignorant, and prey
upon the gullibility that goes along with that unfortunate condition.
To sway them into supporting their loathsome agendas against
personal liberties and human rights.

FORTUNATELY -- **Most** Americans ARE intelligent enough
to *recognize* Sekulow's dishonesty for being just that -- and to
recognize that this "unelected judges" CRAP is precisely that:
dishonest CRAP that's been crafted to make the country's most
ignorant people believe that appellate court judges aren't *sup-
posed* to be appointed... and that those judges' CORRECT
interpretation of the Constitution was something OTHER than
a case of their having done their job **properly.**

RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking water

Dangerous as hell... poisonous to our liberties... and
unconscionably hateful and sociopathic.

-- Craig Chilton

From:	ZenIsWhen
Subject:	Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 03:34:59 -0500

"Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,464 days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!!" wrote in message
news:41fa1e11.87296602@netnews.mchsi.com...
>
> Jay Sekulow is an accomplished lawyer, and he and his
> Anti-ACLU outfit, the "ACLJ," have even argued cases before
> the U.S. Supreme Court. (Almost **always** AGAINST personal
> liberties.)
>
> So -- even though he's **misguided** and **hateful** enough
> to be an RRR cultist... he is NOT an ignorant person.
>
> But whenever he WHINES about same- marriage, he uses
> this SAME phrase over and over again: "unelected judges"...
> "unelected judges"... "unelected judges"... "unelected judges"...
> ad nauseum.

but only against judges who are NOT a part of the religious/political
extremist right.

>
> A phrase you'll NEVER hear him utter is: "checks and balances."
>
> (That would be HONEST!)
>
> AS an accomplished lawyer, he KNOWS that the Constitution
> purposely **calls** for appellate court judges TO be appointed!
> It's a fundamental and constitutional part of our system!
>
> So he's either an ignoramus... which we've ruled out -- OR he's a
> LIAR, for directly implying that the judges in Massachusetts who
> declared the INCLUSION of same- couples in marriage to be
> constitutional got there IMPROPERLY. And that they didn't have
> the RIGHT to interpret the Constitution in that manner.

He's a lawyer .....
and he's a right wing fanatic....
either of which should be enough to question ANYTHING he says.

From:	Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!
Subject:	Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:09:20 GMT

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 03:34:59 -0500,
"ZenIsWhen" wrote:
> Craig Chilton wrote:

>> Jay Sekulow is an accomplished lawyer, and he and his
>> Anti-ACLU outfit, the "ACLJ," have even argued cases before
>> the U.S. Supreme Court. (Almost **always** AGAINST personal
>> liberties.)
>>
>> So -- even though he's **misguided** and **hateful** enough
>> to be an RRR cultist... he is NOT an ignorant person.
>>
>> But whenever he WHINES about same- marriage, he uses
>> this SAME phrase over and over again: "unelected judges"...
>> "unelected judges"... "unelected judges"... "unelected judges"...
>> ad nauseum.

> But only against judges who are NOT a part of the religious/
> political extremist right.

Very true!! The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree with
them as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
latter.)

And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
"constructionist" judges.

If the RRR weren't so good at LYING, they wouldn't be good
for anything at all. With "friends" like the RRR infesting our
nation, Americans don't need any enemies. They are as threat-
ening to our liberties as the EXternal terrorists are to our
infrastructure.

>> A phrase you'll NEVER hear him utter is: "checks and balances."
>>
>> (That would be HONEST!)
>>
>> AS an accomplished lawyer, he KNOWS that the Constitution
>> purposely **calls** for appellate court judges TO be appointed!
>> It's a fundamental and constitutional part of our system!
>>
>> So he's either an ignoramus... which we've ruled out -- OR he's a
>> LIAR, for directly implying that the judges in Massachusetts who
>> declared the INCLUSION of same- couples in marriage to be
>> constitutional got there IMPROPERLY. And that they didn't have
>> the RIGHT to interpret the Constitution in that manner.

> He's a lawyer .....
> and he's a right wing fanatic....
> either of which should be enough to question ANYTHING he says.

-- Craig Chilton

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.

And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)

From:	Bonnie Bitch
Subject:	Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:22:41 -0800

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:09:20 GMT, xanadu222_@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton
-- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!)
wrote:

>The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree with
>them as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
>some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
>appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
>latter.)
>
> And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
>the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
>are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
>callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
>used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
>the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
>"constructionist" judges.

Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!

And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these assloaves shit
their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they obviously
haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones who
consistently rule on their side in matters of religious freedoms, like
when their offspring (usually from the first of their five marriages)
want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to public
school.
Of course, they also piss and moan (usually in a strong backdraft)
about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough to argue
their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.
It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong Gong forbid)
they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges removed or
replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl like
wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing their
own liberties.
Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my new
country of residence, grateful that I got the fuck out in time.
But that's just me.

DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!

Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day --
Bonnie Bitch

From:	Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!
Subject:	Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:41:08 GMT

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:22:41 -0800,
"Bonnie Bitch" wrote:
> Craig Chilton wrote:

>> The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree withthem
>> as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
>> some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
>> appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
>> latter.)
>>
>> And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
>> the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
>> are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
>> callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
>> used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
>> the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
>> "constructionist" judges.

> Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!

Thank you.

> And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these assloaves shit
> their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they obviously
> haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones who
> consistently rule on their side in matters of religious freedoms, like
> when their offspring (usually from the first of their five marriages)
> want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to public
> school.
>
> Of course, they also piss and moan (usually in a strong backdraft)
> about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough to
> argue their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.

HYPOCRISY is one of the RRR cult's long suits. Right up there
with hatefulness and abject ignorance.

> It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong Gong forbid)
> they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges removed or
> replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl like
> wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing their
> own liberties.
>
> Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my new
> country of residence, grateful that I got the fuck out in time.
> But that's just me.

I encourage you to stick around with me and fight the good fight.
No matter what, we ultimately WILL prevail. (Remember the French
Resistance!)

>DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!
>
>Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day --
>Bonnie Bitch

The greatest danger to America's personal liberties NOW (since
Bush unfortunately got himself barely elected) is for retiring Supreme
Court justices to be replaced with ones who ARE cultists of the
"Religious" Radical Right... who then will proceed to "theocratize"
America right OUT of being a free country.

That is something that the PEOPLE absolutely MUST finally get
off their apathetic butts about, and OPPOSE --- ***VIGOROUSLY***.

Freedom isn't free, and we're in grave danger of being taught
that lesson again. THIS time, from WITHIN.

RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking water

-- Craig Chilton

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.

And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)

From:	Bonnie Bitch
Subject:	Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:58:23 -0800

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:41:08 GMT, xanadu222_@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton
-- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!)
wrote:

>On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:22:41 -0800,
>"Bonnie Bitch" wrote:
>> Craig Chilton wrote:
>
>
>>> The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree withthem
>>> as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
>>> some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
>>> appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
>>> latter.)
>>>
>>> And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
>>> the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
>>> are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
>>> callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
>>> used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
>>> the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
>>> "constructionist" judges.
>
>> Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!
>
> Thank you.

You're welcome. I just love it when you hit on an issue near and dear
to my heart!

>> And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these assloaves shit
>> their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they obviously
>> haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones who
>> consistently rule on their side in matters of religious freedoms, like
>> when their offspring (usually from the first of their five marriages)
>> want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to public
>> school.
>>
>> Of course, they also piss and moan (usually in a strong backdraft)
>> about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough to
>> argue their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.
>
> HYPOCRISY is one of the RRR cult's long suits. Right up there
>with hatefulness and abject ignorance.

With some bigotry dressing on that salad.

>> It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong Gong forbid)
>> they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges removed or
>> replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl like
>> wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing their
>> own liberties.
>>
>> Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my new
>> country of residence, grateful that I got the fuck out in time.
>> But that's just me.
>
> I encourage you to stick around with me and fight the good fight.
>No matter what, we ultimately WILL prevail. (Remember the French
>Resistance!)

Uhm, yeah, and most of them got shot in the head.
Being the paranoid (or maybe not) person that I am, I fully expect
that Dumbya will declare martial law sometime during late '05 05 early
'06, citing yet another foe from within, and this time it will include
GLBT people.

>>DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!
>>
>>Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day --
>>Bonnie Bitch
>
> The greatest danger to America's personal liberties NOW (since
>Bush unfortunately got himself barely elected)

Ya know, the those Republ;iCUNT godbots gloat, and the more they try
to silence the "ther election was rigged" voices, I just gotta wonder
if the little fucktard was legitimately elected.

> is for retiring Supreme
>Court justices to be replaced with ones who ARE cultists of the
>"Religious" Radical Right... who then will proceed to "theocratize"
>America right OUT of being a free country.

Yup, that too. And then we're all fucked. Hosed. Screwed.

> That is something that the PEOPLE absolutely MUST finally get
>off their apathetic butts about, and OPPOSE --- ***VIGOROUSLY***.

But what's to stop Dumbya from doing a little executive order,
installing the judges? Remember, we've got a RepubliCUNT congress, so
a veto would be highly unlikely.

> Freedom isn't free, and we're in grave danger of being taught
>that lesson again. THIS time, from WITHIN.

Yup. And anyone who doesn't see the signs needs to get the sight back
in one eye, and take a little class called HISTORY.

> RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking water

Now if they would only take their own medicine.....

Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day --
Bonnie Bitch

From:	Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!
Subject:	Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:10:19 GMT

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:58:23 -0800,
"Bonnie Bitch" wrote:
> Craig Chilton wrote:
>> "Bonnie Bitch" wrote:
>>> Craig Chilton wrote:

[ ... ]

>>>> The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree with them
>>>> as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
>>>> some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
>>>> appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
>>>> latter.)
>>>>
>>>> And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
>>>> the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
>>>> are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
>>>> callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
>>>> used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
>>>> the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
>>>> "constructionist" judges.

>>> Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!

>> Thank you.

> You're welcome. I just love it when you hit on an issue near and dear
> to my heart!

>>> And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these assloaves shit
>>> their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they obviously
>>> haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones who
>>> consistently rule on their side in matters of religious freedoms, like
>>> when their offspring (usually from the first of their five marriages)
>>> want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to public
>>> school.
>>>
>>> Of course, they also piss and moan (usually in a strong backdraft)
>>> about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough to
>>> argue their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.

>> HYPOCRISY is one of the RRR cult's long suits. Right up there
>>with hatefulness and abject ignorance.

> With some bigotry dressing on that salad.

To be more concise, yes. (Hatefulness + ignorance = bigotry.)

>>> It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong Gong forbid)
>>> they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges removed or
>>> replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl like
>>> wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing their
>>> own liberties.
>>>
>>> Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my new
>>> country of residence, grateful that I got the fuck out in time.
>>> But that's just me.

>> I encourage you to stick around with me and fight the good fight.
>> No matter what, we ultimately WILL prevail. (Remember the French
>> Resistance!)

> Uhm, yeah, and most of them got shot in the head. Being the
> paranoid (or maybe not) person that I am, I fully expect that Dumbya
> will declare martial law sometime during late '05 or early '06, citing yet
> another foe from within, and this time it will include GLBT people.

Even as a lame duck, I don't think he could even BEGIN to get
away with doing *that.*

>>> DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION
>>> HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!

>> The greatest danger to America's personal liberties NOW (since
>> Bush unfortunately got himself barely elected)...

> Ya know, the those Republ;iCUNT godbots gloat, and the more
> they try to silence the "ther election was rigged" voices, I just gotta
> wonder if the little fucktard was legitimately elected.

Ask Diebold!! See: www.blackboxvoting.org if that site is still
active.

>> ...is for retiring Supreme Court justices to be replaced with ones
>> who ARE cultists of the "Religious" Radical Right... who then
>> will proceed to "theocratize" America right OUT of being a free
>> country.

> Yup, that too. And then we're all fucked. Hosed. Screwed.

If even so much as ONE egalitarian judge is replaced by a bigot,
that will probably the case for as long as anyone reading this post
today lives -- regardless of the age of the reader.

>> That is something that the PEOPLE absolutely MUST finally get
>> off their apathetic butts about, and OPPOSE --- ***VIGOROUSLY***.

> But what's to stop Dumbya from doing a little executive order,
> installing the judges? Remember, we've got a RepubliCUNT Congress,
> so a veto would be highly unlikely.

Fortunately, executive orders have their limitations.

>> Freedom isn't free, and we're in grave danger of being taught
>> that lesson again. THIS time, from WITHIN.

> Yup. And anyone who doesn't see the signs needs to get the
> sight back in one eye, and take a little class called HISTORY.

Those who don't learn history's lessons are doomed to repeat some
of its mistakes.

>> RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking water

> Now if they would only take their own medicine.....

LOL!!! We should BE so lucky!!

>Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day --
>Bonnie Bitch

-- Craig Chilton

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.

And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)

From:	Bonnie Bitch
Subject:	Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:15:30 -0800

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:10:19 GMT, xanadu222_@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton
-- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!)
wrote:

>On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:58:23 -0800,
>"Bonnie Bitch" wrote:
>> Craig Chilton wrote:
>>> "Bonnie Bitch" wrote:
>>>> Craig Chilton wrote:
>
>
>[ ... ]
>
>>>>> The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree with them
>>>>> as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
>>>>> some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
>>>>> appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
>>>>> latter.)
>>>>>
>>>>> And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
>>>>> the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
>>>>> are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
>>>>> callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
>>>>> used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
>>>>> the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
>>>>> "constructionist" judges.
>
>>>> Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!
>
>>> Thank you.
>
>> You're welcome. I just love it when you hit on an issue near and dear
>> to my heart!
>
>>>> And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these assloaves shit
>>>> their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they obviously
>>>> haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones who
>>>> consistently rule on their side in matters of religious freedoms, like
>>>> when their offspring (usually from the first of their five marriages)
>>>> want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to public
>>>> school.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, they also piss and moan (usually in a strong backdraft)
>>>> about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough to
>>>> argue their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.
>
>>> HYPOCRISY is one of the RRR cult's long suits. Right up there
>>>with hatefulness and abject ignorance.
>
>> With some bigotry dressing on that salad.
>
> To be more concise, yes. (Hatefulness + ignorance = bigotry.)

bigotry leads to unsightly assloafiness, too.

>>>> It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong Gong forbid)
>>>> they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges removed or
>>>> replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl like
>>>> wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing their
>>>> own liberties.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my new
>>>> country of residence, grateful that I got the fuck out in time.
>>>> But that's just me.
>
>>> I encourage you to stick around with me and fight the good fight.
>>> No matter what, we ultimately WILL prevail. (Remember the French
>>> Resistance!)
>
>> Uhm, yeah, and most of them got shot in the head. Being the
>> paranoid (or maybe not) person that I am, I fully expect that Dumbya
>> will declare martial law sometime during late '05 or early '06, citing yet
>> another foe from within, and this time it will include GLBT people.
>
> Even as a lame duck, I don't think he could even BEGIN to get
>away with doing *that.*

I hope not. Then again, I am paranoid....

>>>> DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION
>>>> HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!
>
>>> The greatest danger to America's personal liberties NOW (since
>>> Bush unfortunately got himself barely elected)...
>
>> Ya know, the those Republ;iCUNT godbots gloat, and the more
>> they try to silence the "ther election was rigged" voices, I just gotta
>> wonder if the little fucktard was legitimately elected.
>
> Ask Diebold!! See: www.blackboxvoting.org if that site is still
>active.

Great site! TYVM!

>>> ...is for retiring Supreme Court justices to be replaced with ones
>>> who ARE cultists of the "Religious" Radical Right... who then
>>> will proceed to "theocratize" America right OUT of being a free
>>> country.
>
>> Yup, that too. And then we're all fucked. Hosed. Screwed.
>
> If even so much as ONE egalitarian judge is replaced by a bigot,
>that will probably the case for as long as anyone reading this post
>today lives -- regardless of the age of the reader.

Yup. LIke I said - fucked, hosed, and screwed.
>>> That is something that the PEOPLE absolutely MUST finally get
>>> off their apathetic butts about, and OPPOSE --- ***VIGOROUSLY***.
>
>> But what's to stop Dumbya from doing a little executive order,
>> installing the judges? Remember, we've got a RepubliCUNT Congress,
>> so a veto would be highly unlikely.
>
> Fortunately, executive orders have their limitations.

Let's hope Führer George remembers that.

>>> Freedom isn't free, and we're in grave danger of being taught
>>> that lesson again. THIS time, from WITHIN.
>
>> Yup. And anyone who doesn't see the signs needs to get the
>> sight back in one eye, and take a little class called HISTORY.
>
> Those who don't learn history's lessons are doomed to repeat some
>of its mistakes.

Try all!

>>> RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking water
>
>> Now if they would only take their own medicine.....
>
> LOL!!! We should BE so lucky!!

Maybe if we mixed it with some grape Kool-Aid?

Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day --
Bonnie Bitch
>
>
>
> -- Craig Chilton
>
>~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
> relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
> agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
> has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
>
> And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
> such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
> damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
> the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
> to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
>~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
>
> (E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)

From:	Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!
Subject:	Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 01:23:47 GMT

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:15:30 -0800,
Bonnie Bitch wrote:
> Craig Chilton wrote:
>> "Bonnie Bitch" wrote:
>>> Craig Chilton wrote:
>>>> "Bonnie Bitch" wrote:
>>>>> Craig Chilton wrote:

[ ... ]

>>>>>> The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree with them
>>>>>> as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
>>>>>> some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy." Any
>>>>>> appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
>>>>>> latter.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret
>>>>>> the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal liberties
>>>>>> are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges who
>>>>>> callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
>>>>>> used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
>>>>>> the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
>>>>>> "constructionist" judges.

>>>>> Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!

>>>> Thank you.

>>> You're welcome. I just love it when you hit on an issue near and
>>> dear to my heart!

>>>>> And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these assloaves shit
>>>>> their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they obviously
>>>>> haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones who
>>>>> consistently rule on their side in matters of religious freedoms, like
>>>>> when their offspring (usually from the first of their five marriages)
>>>>> want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to public
>>>>> school.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, they also piss and moan (usually in a strong backdraft)
>>>>> about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough to
>>>>> argue their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.

>>>> HYPOCRISY is one of the RRR cult's long suits. Right up there
>>>> with hatefulness and abject ignorance.

>>> With some bigotry dressing on that salad.

>> To be more concise, yes. (Hatefulness + ignorance = bigotry.)

> Bigotry leads to unsightly assloafiness, too.

Just as I was about to respond here, one of those little pieces of
advice that NBC-TV gives ("The more you know...") came on:

"Two things to avoid around the house: hate and prejudice.

NEVER let them in!"

That says it ALL!!

>>>>> It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong Gong forbid)
>>>>> they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges removed or
>>>>> replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl like
>>>>> wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing their
>>>>> own liberties.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my new
>>>>> country of residence, grateful that I got the fuck out in time.
>>>>> But that's just me.

>>>> I encourage you to stick around with me and fight the good fight.
>>>> No matter what, we ultimately WILL prevail. (Remember the French
>>>> Resistance!)

>>> Uhm, yeah, and most of them got shot in the head. Being the
>>> paranoid (or maybe not) person that I am, I fully expect that Dumbya
>>> will declare martial law sometime during late '05 or early '06, citing yet
>>> another foe from within, and this time it will include GLBT people.

>> Even as a lame duck, I don't think he could even BEGIN to get
>> away with doing *that.*

> I hope not. Then again, I am paranoid....

Think positively. It's the BEST way to fight the bigots.

>>>>> DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION
>>>>> HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!

>>>> The greatest danger to America's personal liberties NOW (since
>>>> Bush unfortunately got himself barely elected)...

>>> Ya know, the those Republ;iCUNT godbots gloat, and the more
>>> they try to silence the "ther election was rigged" voices, I just gotta
>>> wonder if the little fucktard was legitimately elected.

>> Ask Diebold!! See: www.blackboxvoting.org if that site is still
>> active.

> Great site! TYVM!

You're very welcome. I'm glad it's still active!

>>>> ...is for retiring Supreme Court justices to be replaced with ones
>>>> who ARE cultists of the "Religious" Radical Right... who then
>>>> will proceed to "theocratize" America right OUT of being a free
>>>> country.

>>> Yup, that too. And then we're all fucked. Hosed. Screwed.

>> If even so much as ONE egalitarian judge is replaced by a bigot,
>> that will probably the case for as long as anyone reading this post
>> today lives -- regardless of the age of the reader.

> Yup. LIke I said - fucked, hosed, and screwed.

I'll re-post an admonition that I put up BEFORE the disastrous
election, that covers what we may be in for in more depth. We can't
undo the election (unfortunately) -- but knowing what we now must
deal with, may help us to strategize better.

It's entitled:

Next Supreme Court Justice: Affirmation of Liberty,
or Unthinkable Tyranny will Result.

I just now posted it, and it'll be on your server in all of the
newsgroups that this thread is reaching.

>>>> That is something that the PEOPLE absolutely MUST finally get
>>>> off their apathetic butts about, and OPPOSE --- ***VIGOROUSLY***.

>>> But what's to stop Dumbya from doing a little executive order,
>>> installing the judges? Remember, we've got a RepubliCUNT Congress,
>>> so a veto would be highly unlikely.

>> Fortunately, executive orders have their limitations.

> Let's hope Führer George remembers that.

Or -- that if he doesn't, he gets a good, swift kick in the butt
from those empowered to limit him.

>>>> Freedom isn't free, and we're in grave danger of being taught
>>>> that lesson again. THIS time, from WITHIN.

>>> Yup. And anyone who doesn't see the signs needs to get the
>>> sight back in one eye, and take a little class called HISTORY.

>> Those who don't learn history's lessons are doomed to repeat some
>> of its mistakes.

> Try all!

In keeping with my being scrupulously honest in my posts (to the
unceasing frustration of the RRR cultists who'd just LOVE to catch
me in a slip-up in that regard... but never can)... I was allowing for
the possibility that the mistake-makers might not come up with ALL
of the *same* mistakes to repeat. :)

>>>> RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking water

>>> Now if they would only take their own medicine.....

>> LOL!!! We should BE so lucky!!

> Maybe if we mixed it with some grape Kool-Aid?

LOL!!!!

-- Craig Chilton

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.

And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)

From:	Mark Sebree
Subject:	Re: Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.
Date:	23 Jan 2005 19:52:58 -0800

Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,463 days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!! wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:15:30 -0800,
> Bonnie Bitch wrote:
> > Craig Chilton wrote:
> >> "Bonnie Bitch" wrote:
> >>> Craig Chilton wrote:
> >>>> "Bonnie Bitch" wrote:
> >>>>> Craig Chilton wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> >>>>>> The RRR cult refers to the judges who disagree with them
> >>>>>> as "activist" judges... as though "activist" is supposed to be
> >>>>>> some sort of pejorative term. (Compare "activist" to "lazy."
Any
> >>>>>> appellate judge who does NOT actively do his job right, is the
> >>>>>> latter.)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And to the RRR cult -- while judges who properly interpret

> >>>>>> the Constitution with an eye to defending our personal
liberties
> >>>>>> are hatefully referred to as "activist" judges... the judges
who
> >>>>>> callously IGNORE parts of the Constitution which COULD be
> >>>>>> used to defend our liberties, with an eye INSTEAD to serving
> >>>>>> the loathsome and repressive agendas of the RRR... are called
> >>>>>> "constructionist" judges.
>
> >>>>> Good point, once again, my dear, darling Craig!
>
> >>>> Thank you.
>
> >>> You're welcome. I just love it when you hit on an issue near
and
> >>> dear to my heart!
>
> >>>>> And just as a further note -- ya gotta wonder if these
assloaves shit
> >>>>> their brains out piecemeal or all at once, because they
obviously
> >>>>> haven't noticed that these same "activist" judges are the ones
who
> >>>>> consistently rule on their side in matters of religious
freedoms, like
> >>>>> when their offspring (usually from the first of their five
marriages)
> >>>>> want to wear the replicas of their dead savior on a stick to
public
> >>>>> school.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Of course, they also piss and moan (usually in a strong
backdraft)
> >>>>> about the ACLU, the only people who pity the assloaves enough
to
> >>>>> argue their cases in court for them -- FOR FREE, no less.
>
> >>>> HYPOCRISY is one of the RRR cult's long suits. Right up
there
> >>>> with hatefulness and abject ignorance.
>
> >>> With some bigotry dressing on that salad.
>
> >> To be more concise, yes. (Hatefulness + ignorance =3D bigotry.)
>
> > Bigotry leads to unsightly assloafiness, too.
>
> Just as I was about to respond here, one of those little pieces
of
> advice that NBC-TV gives ("The more you know...") came on:
>
> "Two things to avoid around the house: hate and prejudice.
>
> NEVER let them in!"
>
> That says it ALL!!
>
> >>>>> It just boggles my mind. But you wait and see -- if (Gong
Gong forbid)
> >>>>> they get their way and have these eeeeevil activist judges
removed or
> >>>>> replaced with what they think they want, they are going to howl
like
> >>>>> wounded banshees when the replacement judges start curtailing
their
> >>>>> own liberties.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Of course, by that time, I will be laughing at them from my
new
> >>>>> country of residence, grateful that I got the fuck out in time.

> >>>>> But that's just me.
>
> >>>> I encourage you to stick around with me and fight the good
fight.
> >>>> No matter what, we ultimately WILL prevail. (Remember the
French
> >>>> Resistance!)
>
> >>> Uhm, yeah, and most of them got shot in the head. Being the
> >>> paranoid (or maybe not) person that I am, I fully expect that
Dumbya
> >>> will declare martial law sometime during late '05 or early '06,
citing yet
> >>> another foe from within, and this time it will include GLBT
people.
>
> >> Even as a lame duck, I don't think he could even BEGIN to get
> >> away with doing *that.*
>
> > I hope not. Then again, I am paranoid....
>
> Think positively. It's the BEST way to fight the bigots.
>
> >>>>> DIVERSITY -- PARTY OF ONE -- YOUR CELEBRATION
> >>>>> HAS BEGUN!!!!!!!
>
> >>>> The greatest danger to America's personal liberties NOW
(since
> >>>> Bush unfortunately got himself barely elected)...
>
> >>> Ya know, the those Republ;iCUNT godbots gloat, and the more
> >>> they try to silence the "ther election was rigged" voices, I just
gotta
> >>> wonder if the little fucktard was legitimately elected.
>
> >> Ask Diebold!! See: www.blackboxvoting.org if that site is
still
> >> active.
>
> > Great site! TYVM!
>
> You're very welcome. I'm glad it's still active!
>

I hope that it stays active. As it stands, there are too few checks on
the new voting machines, and there are too many ways to add cheats into
the system that make sure a particular candidate or party wins which
are also undetectable UNLESS you know what you are looking for. And I
know of what I speak, my Masters in in Applied Computer Science.

Simple, straight forward ways that checks could be added into the
system that would make such cheating and "ballot box stuffing" harder
to do. And to the best of my knowledge, none of these additions would
threaten voter privacy, while they would make cheating harder.

1=2E the programming becomes open source, so everyone can check the
validity and security of the code, especially for hidden traps and
changes on the tallying on the fly.

2=2E Every voter gets a time stamped, bar coded printout of their votes.
Simple register tape would do, and is freely available.
2=2Ea. As the paper tape is made for the voter, and identical tape is
make to store in the machine.
2=2Eb. A reader is available at the voting site that is programmed to
read the voter's tape, and display whom they voted for.
2=2Ec. The voter can all request that his/her votes from the machine be
read using a hand-held reader if a possible discrepancy has appeared.
The access to this can be through a glass plate over the tape, and a
locked door with an access counter.
2=2Ed. If the voter thinks that there is a discrepancy, the voter can
feed his "receipt" back into the machine, where the machine displays
the previous votes, and then voids the old votes on the permanent tape,
and preferably on the voter's tape. The voter can then vote again.
2=2Ee. In order to keep the ballot box stuffing down (I am not naive
enough to think that you can do away with it completely), a change in
ballot can only be down on the same machine (which is NOT encoded into
the voter's tape) and within a certain amount of time, say 10 - 15
minutes.

3=2E The use of the paper tape can aid in recounts, since the tape can be
fed through a reader, and checked rapidly. If a hand recount is
needed, the tape can be checked by the same type of hand readers that
are used on site.

The biggest problems with the current machines by Diebold (besides the
fact that the Board includes friends of Bush), is that there is no way
to check the votes besides the electronic tally, and there are too many
ways to mess with the machines internally. That is why so many people
were against the use of the machines this year.

Mark Sebree

> >>>> ...is for retiring Supreme Court justices to be replaced with
ones
> >>>> who ARE cultists of the "Religious" Radical Right... who then
> >>>> will proceed to "theocratize" America right OUT of being a free
> >>>> country.
>
> >>> Yup, that too. And then we're all fucked. Hosed. Screwed.
>
> >> If even so much as ONE egalitarian judge is replaced by a
bigot,
> >> that will probably the case for as long as anyone reading this
post
> >> today lives -- regardless of the age of the reader.
>
> > Yup. LIke I said - fucked, hosed, and screwed.
>
> I'll re-post an admonition that I put up BEFORE the disastrous
> election, that covers what we may be in for in more depth. We can't
> undo the election (unfortunately) -- but knowing what we now must
> deal with, may help us to strategize better.
>
> It's entitled:
>
> Next Supreme Court Justice: Affirmation of Liberty,
> or Unthinkable Tyranny will Result.
>
> I just now posted it, and it'll be on your server in all of the
> newsgroups that this thread is reaching.
>
> >>>> That is something that the PEOPLE absolutely MUST finally
get
> >>>> off their apathetic butts about, and OPPOSE ---
***VIGOROUSLY***.
>
> >>> But what's to stop Dumbya from doing a little executive
order,
> >>> installing the judges? Remember, we've got a RepubliCUNT
Congress,
> >>> so a veto would be highly unlikely.
>
> >> Fortunately, executive orders have their limitations.
>
> > Let's hope F=FChrer George remembers that.
>
> Or -- that if he doesn't, he gets a good, swift kick in the butt
> from those empowered to limit him.
>
> >>>> Freedom isn't free, and we're in grave danger of being
taught
> >>>> that lesson again. THIS time, from WITHIN.
>
> >>> Yup. And anyone who doesn't see the signs needs to get the
> >>> sight back in one eye, and take a little class called HISTORY.
>
> >> Those who don't learn history's lessons are doomed to repeat
some
> >> of its mistakes.
>
> > Try all!
>
> In keeping with my being scrupulously honest in my posts (to the
> unceasing frustration of the RRR cultists who'd just LOVE to catch
> me in a slip-up in that regard... but never can)... I was allowing
for
> the possibility that the mistake-makers might not come up with ALL
> of the *same* mistakes to repeat. :)
>
> >>>> RRR : society :: 5% arsenic solution : glass of drinking
water
>
> >>> Now if they would only take their own medicine.....
>
> >> LOL!!! We should BE so lucky!!
>
> > Maybe if we mixed it with some grape Kool-Aid?
>
> LOL!!!!
>
>
>
> -- Craig Chilton
>
> ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
> relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
> agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
> has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
>
> And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
> such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
> damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
> the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
> to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate
destination.
> ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
>=20
> (E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)