knowledge-database (beta)

Current group: alt.alcohol

"Chadwick Stone©" REPOST BY USENET SENSOR SERVICE Re: [k0oKs0oT ALERT] {Was: DESTRUCTION OF ALT.CULTURE.ALASKA}

"Chadwick Stone©" REPOST BY USENET SENSOR SERVICE Re: [k0oKs0oT ALERT] {Was: DESTRUCTION OF ALT.CULTURE.ALASKA}  
autobot
From:autobot
Subject:"Chadwick Stone©" REPOST BY USENET SENSOR SERVICE Re: [k0oKs0oT ALERT] {Was: DESTRUCTION OF ALT.CULTURE.ALASKA}
Date:Sun, 26 Dec 2004 00:47:58 GMT
usenet sensor service (llc.):
action: article reformattd, repsotd:

>x-no-archive: yes
>"justice-for-all" wrote in message
>news:1104010243.874021.9720@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...


reason: excessive abuse of character (*)
followup: none
disappissing stream; | floe, then reinject to NEWS-server, nntp

>x-no-archive: yes
>"justice-for-all" wrote in message
>news:1104010243.874021.9720@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> here is an article re what the (STAR DELETED) people (STAR DELETED) who receive this
>> malicious spam think should be done to these spammers.
>>
>> as with "many actions of an abused victim"...sometimes the baby gets
>> thrown out with the bath-water, which is (STAR DELETED) why (STAR DELETED) there must be active
>> involvement with (STAR DELETED) readers of usenet (STAR DELETED) in whatever way they access the
>> usenet.
>
>you mean that you need many of you to try and censor those whom you dislike.
>
>> since it appears that the "kooks", "trolls" and "sock puppets" continue
>> to (STAR DELETED) apparently think (STAR DELETED) they are immune
>
>i am immune, dumbass. the first amendment guarantees that i may articulate
>myself in any venue with public access. you also have the right to express
>yourself, and you utilize your right simply to express your powerlessness
>and desire to censor others. why are you not choking on the irony of your
>position, right this very minute?
>
>> from any action taken against their maliciousness and as evidenced by
>> those who have already posted on this thread, (STAR DELETED) think (STAR DELETED) it is (STAR DELETED) fun (STAR DELETED) to
>> continue their intentional
>> harassment, we must make it (STAR DELETED) clear (STAR DELETED) that it is the "usenet gangs and
>> their domains (STAR DELETED) that we are (STAR DELETED) targeting (STAR DELETED) and not the (STAR DELETED) entire usenet (STAR DELETED) .
>
>i assert that it is (STAR DELETED) you (STAR DELETED) and your (STAR DELETED) asterick (STAR DELETED)
> (STAR DELETED) abusing (STAR DELETED) (STAR DELETED) all (STAR DELETED) (STAR DELETED) caps (STAR DELETED)
> (STAR DELETED) posting (STAR DELETED) that is ruining this newsfroup. hell, isn't it?
>
>> as can be clearly read by the post from chadwick stone..it is (STAR DELETED) his
>> position (STAR DELETED) that usenet is a screaming bunch of idiots (paraphased) and
>> we are supposed to just accept it; or, that it is (STAR DELETED) our own fault (STAR DELETED) if we
>> walk into a pet shop with barking dogs and expect it to be quiet.
>
>you are using a public access venue which is shared by countless other
>personalities. if you don't like the static then tune it out.
>
>> the fact and reality of course is:
>> ==================================
>> the alt.culture.alaska group was intentionally (STAR DELETED) invaded (STAR DELETED) by (STAR DELETED) them (STAR DELETED) in
>> (STAR DELETED) an organized pattern of behavior that has been established for many
>> years (STAR DELETED) ....
>
>paranoia noted. i am defending my goodly and righteous name as usenet's
>most helpful netizen.
>
>> which "pattern of conduct, is (STAR DELETED) prove of their
>> (STAR DELETED) intention (STAR DELETED) ....which provides a (STAR DELETED) historical record (STAR DELETED) for the isp's and
>> servers, to ban them from their services and eliminate them from (STAR DELETED) our
>> view (STAR DELETED) when we are the users of these isps and servers.
>
> (STAR DELETED) our view (STAR DELETED) ? for whom do you speak and who appointed you?
>
>it is not the job of isps and nntp hosts to remove me and others from your
>view, it's your own job to do that, either by ignoring undesired ps0asts,
>killfiling undesired ps0asters, or medicating yourself so that you do not
>care.
>
>> this (STAR DELETED) pattern of conduct (STAR DELETED) is also a necessary element in any lawsuit.
>>
>> in law, we, the users are usually (STAR DELETED) required (STAR DELETED) to put our isp's and
>> servers "on written notice (STAR DELETED) about this maliciousness and (STAR DELETED) request the
>> banning of these well-known domains and posters (STAR DELETED) , if.....they fail to
>> remove them, then we, the user's of these services can file suit
>> against the isp's and servers for "condoning this intentional
>> harassment and abuse"
>
> (STAR DELETED) (STAR DELETED) (STAR DELETED) k0oks0ot alert (STAR DELETED) (STAR DELETED) (STAR DELETED)
> (STAR DELETED) (STAR DELETED) (STAR DELETED) k0oks0ot alert (STAR DELETED)
> (STAR DELETED) (STAR DELETED) (STAR DELETED) (STAR DELETED) (STAR DELETED) k0oks0ot alert (STAR DELETED)
> (STAR DELETED) (STAR DELETED)
>
>since you want to cite (STAR DELETED) law (STAR DELETED) i suggest you first review isp aup/tos
>agreements as to what constitutes this so-called maliciousness, then contact
>an attorney and ask what he can do to help you silence people you don't want
>to hear/see on usenet. beeeeeeeeee sure to post what he says lol!
>
>> ...which is why (STAR DELETED) the petitions i am talking about
>> are necessary (STAR DELETED) . those of you who have already filed complaints with
>> your isp's/servers, etc. probably have "complaint numbers" attached to
>> an auto-reply from them...i know that google and yahoo does this...and
>> i have saved those e-mails for just this purpose.
>>
>> the (STAR DELETED) fact (STAR DELETED) that usenet, itself does nothing, nor does alt.config which
>> (STAR DELETED) approves groups for the usenet (STAR DELETED) , clearly should be involved in this
>> entire process, since it has, or should have....the authority to close
>> down these known domains of these gangs, as well as banning the
>> posters.
>
>the (STAR DELETED) fact (STAR DELETED) that usenet, itself does nothing is due to the fact that usenet
>is a collection of newsfroups and (STAR DELETED) not (STAR DELETED) some nntp god that oversees it's
>creation. if you want to annoy alt.config regulars with your message of
>censorship, go ahead. i'll keep an eye on that ng and would love to watch
>the responses you get!
>
>> the (STAR DELETED) fact (STAR DELETED) is, you can go to the alt.config newsgroup right now and
>> find the many blatant attacks by the (STAR DELETED) same gang members (STAR DELETED) against the
>> alt.config moderators who accept proposals for newsgroups, as well as
>> those who are attempting to propose a newsgroup. you will find "2rowdy"
>> who has posted his attacks on nearly each thread. again his (STAR DELETED) intent (STAR DELETED) is
>> obvious and has (STAR DELETED) no other purpose (STAR DELETED) than to (STAR DELETED) harass (STAR DELETED) , yet alt.config,
>> permits it's own group to be beseiged with this harassment of
>> themselves and others.
>
>moderators? there are no moderators in ac, it's unmoderated.
>
>> there are many suggestions/opinions from the people who have been
>> spammed so i am sending the url..i suggest that you (STAR DELETED) save (STAR DELETED) those posts
>> from these people for future reference and use if you are willing to
>> stop this usenet abuse. sylvia
>> ==============
>> subject:
>> spam readers get creative about stamping out spam december 2,2004
>>
>> http://www.informationweek.com/story/showarticle.jhtml?articleid=55800707
>>
>> excuse caps-nerve damaged arm
>
>please stop screaming!!!
>
>a good 50/50 bacardi and coke or four would help relax you, pumpkin.
>
>--
>
> chadwick stone©
>
> formerly the afa-b sovereign sockpuppet©
> "no longer anonymous but still immune"
> usenet's most helpful netizen
>
> sovereignsockpuppet at yahoo dot com
> benevolent order of the pointy stick
> skepticult® id: 581-00504-208
> a mean and nasty bastard
> i am the new world order



========================================================================

usenet sensor service (llc.) does not support or deny viewpoints of the author(;s) of the preceeding all liability rests with them. please direct
any formatting complaints to your local 404 repositry for further action.

Copyright 2004 usenet sensor service (llc.)

>======== w i d e l i n e="+3000"===================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================

sucrose mammy stones jackhandle net garafolia repent plymouth ambrosia




your browser does not support html get with the program update to something
modern.
   

Copyright © 2006 knowledge-database   -   All rights reserved