knowledge-database (beta)

Current group: alt.pagan.

Re: This place is so over

Re: This place is so over  
Dan Baldwin
 Re: Wollmann's "career" is so over  
Edmond Wollmann is a Convicted Criminal
From:Dan Baldwin
Subject:Re: This place is so over
Date:Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:11:33 -0800
Wollmann was wearing his AArctophilax@yahoo.com sock when he wrote:
>
>
> If they wish to learn I am here to share, but the confrontation is a
> part of the search for truth.

Bullshit, Wollmann.

You're here to lecture and to be worshiped. You're here to stroke your
own bloated ego. You've had a couple of people recently try to engage
you in honest question/answer, and you immediately degenerated into
calling their views "defective", vomiting up chunks of pre-packaged
screed in lieu of genuine interaction, and trotting out your old stand
by : argument by assertion.

You don't want dialogue, you want people to listen with rapt attention.
You don't want discussions, you want an audience who hang in thrall on
your every word. In most people these would just be the signs of an ego
out of control, but in you they are signs of your deep rooted
insecurities.

Deep down inside you are insecure, and to try and distract yourself from
that you come barging into aa (and other groups) spewing titanic loads
of turgidly verbose and contradictory nonsense, demanding to be seen as
a guru sent from on high to hand out enlightenment. What other reason
would you have for spending so much time among people you repeatedly
claim are vastly inferior to you in all ways, if not for ego validation?

Its my opinion that you don't genuinely believe in astrology (your
version or any other), Wollmann. It just makes a convenient prop, a
serviceable vehicle you can use to put on your "Great And Powerful Oz"
routine. Since astrology isn't a rigidly defined science you think you
can get away with whatever polysyllabic spin you care to put on it.

You're enamored of impressive sounding slogans and sound bytes, which,
upon close examination, break down into the meaningless collections of
vowels and consonants they really are. By choosing as your venue
astrology you think to be able to isolate yourself from /factual/
criticism, and can then hand-wave away any philosophical criticisms by
claming the critic is biased, not ready to understand, etc.

The other astrologers here and in the moderated group don't seem to have
the major problems dealing with differing opinions and interpretations
that you do, Wollmann. Perhaps that's because the bottom line is that
you yourself /don't actually believe/ the piffle you spew, and only want
to hear agreement and/or adoration for anything you say about anything
under, over, within, or beyond the sun.

You make a pretense at wanting discussion, but in the end all you really
want is validation, because under that dried up, boisterous exterior of
yours you're really a scared little boy who's nearing the end of his
time on this Earth with not much to show for it other than a vast
collection of twaddle archived on Google and a criminal conviction for
trespass.


--
Dan Baldwin, unethical *by design*

I am a minion of Satan, but my powers are mainly administrative.

Hail the un-alive
From:Edmond Wollmann is a Convicted Criminal
Subject:Re: Wollmann's "career" is so over
Date:Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:20:36 -0800
Dan Baldwin wrote:

> Wollmann was wearing his AArctophilax@yahoo.com sock when he wrote:
>
>>
>>If they wish to learn I am here to share, but the confrontation is a
>>part of the search for truth.
>
>
> Bullshit, Wollmann.
>
> You're here to lecture and to be worshiped. You're here to stroke your
> own bloated ego. You've had a couple of people recently try to engage
> you in honest question/answer, and you immediately degenerated into
> calling their views "defective", vomiting up chunks of pre-packaged
> screed in lieu of genuine interaction, and trotting out your old stand
> by : argument by assertion.
>
> You don't want dialogue, you want people to listen with rapt attention.
> You don't want discussions, you want an audience who hang in thrall on
> your every word. In most people these would just be the signs of an ego
> out of control, but in you they are signs of your deep rooted
> insecurities.
>
> Deep down inside you are insecure, and to try and distract yourself from
> that you come barging into aa (and other groups) spewing titanic loads
> of turgidly verbose and contradictory nonsense, demanding to be seen as
> a guru sent from on high to hand out enlightenment. What other reason
> would you have for spending so much time among people you repeatedly
> claim are vastly inferior to you in all ways, if not for ego validation?
>
> Its my opinion that you don't genuinely believe in astrology (your
> version or any other), Wollmann. It just makes a convenient prop, a
> serviceable vehicle you can use to put on your "Great And Powerful Oz"
> routine. Since astrology isn't a rigidly defined science you think you
> can get away with whatever polysyllabic spin you care to put on it.
>
> You're enamored of impressive sounding slogans and sound bytes, which,
> upon close examination, break down into the meaningless collections of
> vowels and consonants they really are. By choosing as your venue
> astrology you think to be able to isolate yourself from /factual/
> criticism, and can then hand-wave away any philosophical criticisms by
> claming the critic is biased, not ready to understand, etc.
>
> The other astrologers here and in the moderated group don't seem to have
> the major problems dealing with differing opinions and interpretations
> that you do, Wollmann. Perhaps that's because the bottom line is that
> you yourself /don't actually believe/ the piffle you spew, and only want
> to hear agreement and/or adoration for anything you say about anything
> under, over, within, or beyond the sun.
>
> You make a pretense at wanting discussion, but in the end all you really
> want is validation, because under that dried up, boisterous exterior of
> yours you're really a scared little boy who's nearing the end of his
> time on this Earth with not much to show for it other than a vast
> collection of twaddle archived on Google and a criminal conviction for
> trespass.
>
>


SUB



FUCKING



SCA-RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIBE!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!
   

Copyright © 2006 knowledge-database   -   All rights reserved