|
|
 | | From: | Edmond Wollmann | | Subject: | Re: This place is so over | | Date: | 19 Jan 2005 13:55:59 -0800 |
|
|
 | Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> Dan Baldwin@individual.net wrote:
> > Wollmann was wearing his AArctophilax@yahoo.com sock when he wrote:
> > > If they wish to learn I am here to share, but the confrontation
is
> a
> > > part of the search for truth.
> > Bullshit, Wollmann.
> > You're here to lecture and to be worshiped. You're here to stroke
> your
> > own bloated ego. You've had a couple of people recently try to
engage
> > you in honest question/answer, and you immediately degenerated into
> > calling their views "defective", vomiting up chunks of pre-packaged
> > screed in lieu of genuine interaction, and trotting out your old
> stand
> > by : argument by assertion.
> Arguments are defective by the rules of logic.
> > You don't want dialogue, you want people to listen with rapt
> attention.
> > You don't want discussions, you want an audience who hang in thrall
> on
> > your every word. In most people these would just be the signs of an
> ego
> > out of control, but in you they are signs of your deep rooted
> > insecurities.
> I see, Dr. "Dan". How come you like to use the name Dan as a fake
> screenname so much?
> > Deep down inside you are insecure, and to try and distract yourself
> from
> > that you come barging into aa (and other groups) spewing titanic
> loads
> > of turgidly verbose and contradictory nonsense, demanding to be
seen
> as
> > a guru sent from on high to hand out enlightenment. What other
reason
> My first statements in my text refute your assertions, Guru following
> is out of integrity and powerless behavior.
> > would you have for spending so much time among people you
repeatedly
> > claim are vastly inferior to you in all ways, if not for ego
> validation?
> Because they actually ARE inferior? And I don't focus on their
> inferiority, it simply comes out as a matter of interaction.
> > Its my opinion that you don't genuinely believe in astrology (your
> > version or any other), Wollmann. It just makes a convenient prop, a
> > serviceable vehicle you can use to put on your "Great And Powerful
> Oz"
> > routine. Since astrology isn't a rigidly defined science you think
> you
> > can get away with whatever polysyllabic spin you care to put on it.
> Astrology is a tool, as I have stated many times, I use a mirror, and
> also watch the weather reports often if I need to, but neither needs
> "believing in" in order to be useful to me. They give me general
> guidelines to alter or adjust my life or behavior if I wish to do so
> using them. You are confusing the religious and scientific dogma
which
> other arguers here attempt to use against me, for my clear logic that
I
> employ.
> I don't pretend that astrology will be evident in every little event
on
> Earth as typical astrologers do, that is because of wisdom, not ego.
> > You're enamored of impressive sounding slogans and sound bytes,
> which,
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > upon close examination, break down into the meaningless collections
> of
> > vowels and consonants they really are. By choosing as your venue
> > astrology you think to be able to isolate yourself from /factual/
> > criticism, and can then hand-wave away any philosophical criticisms
> by
> > claming the critic is biased, not ready to understand, etc.
> Ahhh, but I am an expert on linguistics and reading right into people
> and the words they use, even when they "believe" they are fooling me.
> Sometimes I let them know I see through them, often I do not.
#1
Subject: Re: On astrology and prejudice
From: lazzwaldo@aol.com (LazzWaldo)
Date: 1997/11/06
Message-ID: <19971106054500.AAA09146@ladder02.news.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.astrology
[More Headers]
[Subscribe to alt.astrology]
maberry wrote:
>Okay, you're pretty funny sometimes. Here goes.
That's my intent. I know I go along and beyond the edge sometimes,
taking chances. Sometimes I hit it on the button, and other times I go
too far.
Like my friend's mom, who wore these big coke-bottle glasses, said to
him once (after reducing his sister to tears from teasing):
"You know, sometimes you're funny.
AND SOMETIMES YOU HURT PEOPLE!"
#2 <3548D561.2E63@pacbell.net>
Path:
In article <3548D561.2E63@pacbell.net>, anonym=99
writes
..=2E.
>Ya know, my friend's mom had a saying:
>"You know, sometimes you're funny...AND SOMETIMES YOU *HURT* PEOPLE!"
You do that to me sometimes. Without warning, my chest muscles spasm
and I my breath comes in short pants, sometimes until my sides ache. I
have learned to put the coffee cup to one side upon seeing your posts.
>I thank her, and you, for the wonderful compliments.>
"Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend. Just what you want
to be, you'll be in the end." The Moody Blues "Nights in White Satin"
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
=A9 2005 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Articles http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/info.htm
Artworks http://www.e-wollmann.com/TOC.htm
|
|
| | From: | Edmond Wollmann is a Convicted Criminal | | Subject: | Re: This place is so over | | Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:15:12 -0800 |
|
|
| Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>
Why are you responding to yourself, you goddamned retard?
|
|
| | From: | | | Subject: | Wollmannizer nocem 03305 @@NCM | | Date: | 19 Jan 2005 13:55:59 -0300 |
|
|
| http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
http://www.nocem.org/
http://www.rahul.net/falk/quickrefs.html#W
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
@@BEGIN NCM HEADERS
Version: 0.9
Issuer: wollmannizer@spam.free
Type: spew
Action: hide
Count: 1
Notice-ID: Wollmannizer03305
@BEGIN NCM BODY
<1106171759.382466.96920@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> alt.astrology
alt.astrology.metapsych alt.paranormal alt.psychology alt.pagan
@END NCM BODY
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQA/AwUBQe83rlIcW5ONdL49EQLijQCdFX+FaE4thw7hNio6PI6OFGUh+DEAoLMX
sKkRhpBoloB86jBtISo9Fi0t
=sDJQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
