|
|
 | | From: | Edmond Wollmann | | Subject: | Re: This place is so over | | Date: | 20 Jan 2005 10:30:31 -0800 |
|
|
 | Dan Baldwin wrote:
> Wollmann was wearing his AArctophilax@yahoo.com sock when he wrote:
> > If they wish to learn I am here to share, but the confrontation is
a
> > part of the search for truth.
> Bullshit, Wollmann.
> You're here to lecture and to be worshiped. You're here to stroke
your
> own bloated ego. You've had a couple of people recently try to engage
> you in honest question/answer, and you immediately degenerated into
> calling their views "defective", vomiting up chunks of pre-packaged
> screed in lieu of genuine interaction, and trotting out your old
stand
> by : argument by assertion.
I argue with reason.
> You don't want dialogue, you want people to listen with rapt
attention.
> You don't want discussions, you want an audience who hang in thrall
on
> your every word. In most people these would just be the signs of an
ego
> out of control, but in you they are signs of your deep rooted
> insecurities.
So this is how you treat the metally disturbed?
> Deep down inside you are insecure, and to try and distract yourself
from
> that you come barging into aa (and other groups) spewing titanic
loads
> of turgidly verbose and contradictory nonsense, demanding to be seen
as
> a guru sent from on high to hand out enlightenment. What other reason
> would you have for spending so much time among people you repeatedly
> claim are vastly inferior to you in all ways, if not for ego
validation?
Because I like exchanging ideas and views?
> Its my opinion that you don't genuinely believe in astrology (your
> version or any other), Wollmann. It just makes a convenient prop, a
> serviceable vehicle you can use to put on your "Great And Powerful
Oz"
> routine. Since astrology isn't a rigidly defined science you think
you
> can get away with whatever polysyllabic spin you care to put on it.
Of course, there is no one truth, except that the truth is the
composition of ALL truths.
> You're enamored of impressive sounding slogans and sound bytes,
which,
> upon close examination, break down into the meaningless collections
of
> vowels and consonants they really are. By choosing as your venue
> astrology you think to be able to isolate yourself from /factual/
> criticism, and can then hand-wave away any philosophical criticisms
by
> claming the critic is biased, not ready to understand, etc.
One man's ceiling is another man's (woman's) floor.
> The other astrologers here and in the moderated group don't seem to
have
> the major problems dealing with differing opinions and
interpretations
> that you do, Wollmann. Perhaps that's because the bottom line is that
> you yourself /don't actually believe/ the piffle you spew, and only
want
> to hear agreement and/or adoration for anything you say about
anything
> under, over, within, or beyond the sun.
And you want to hear otherwise I suppose?
> You make a pretense at wanting discussion, but in the end all you
really
> want is validation, because under that dried up, boisterous exterior
of
> yours you're really a scared little boy who's nearing the end of his
> time on this Earth with not much to show for it other than a vast
My father turns 80 this year, I am far healthier than he, so based on
that idea barring any accidental death, I have at least 40 years left.
That is hardly a life being over.
> collection of twaddle archived on Google and a criminal conviction
for
> trespass (riding the motorcycle too close to a RR track:-)).
You are jealous of my diligent stocking of the archives with evidence
that overwhelms the spinics I see.
And let us suppose just for a ludicrous minute, that what you say is
indeed true.
How does it serve any positive purpose to harass me for 10 years
calling me names etc. if indeed you or others were to actually believe
the tripe you just posted?
Basically, when I see a kook or other such disturbed person on the
street or whatever in my life, I either ignore them because I do not
wish to deal with it at the time, or offer constructive guidance or
help if I do pay attention. It is the immature and troubled person, who
responds the way you do.
"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him
absolutely no good." - Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
=A9 2005 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
AOL http://hometown.aol.com/ehwollmann/myhomepage/business.html
|
|
| | From: | Cujo DeSockpuppet | | Subject: | Re: This place is so over | | Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:32:12 +0000 (UTC) |
|
|
| "Edmond Wollmann" wrote in
news:1106245831.239462.209740@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
> Dan Baldwin wrote:
>> Wollmann was wearing his AArctophilax@yahoo.com sock when he wrote:
>
>> > If they wish to learn I am here to share, but the confrontation is
> a
>> > part of the search for truth.
>
>> Bullshit, Wollmann.
>
>> You're here to lecture and to be worshiped. You're here to stroke
> your
>> own bloated ego. You've had a couple of people recently try to engage
>> you in honest question/answer, and you immediately degenerated into
>> calling their views "defective", vomiting up chunks of pre-packaged
>> screed in lieu of genuine interaction, and trotting out your old
> stand
>> by : argument by assertion.
>
> I argue with reason.
And you lose every fucking time, dicksnot.
|
|
| | From: | Keera Ann Fox | | Subject: | Re: This place is so over | | Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:52:29 +0100 |
|
|
| Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> I argue with reason.
Yes.
--
****** Keera in Norway ******
* Think big. Shrink to fit. *
http://home.online.no/~kafox/
|
|
| | From: | Edmond Wollmann is a Convicted Criminal | | Subject: | Re: This place is so over | | Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:53:26 -0800 |
|
|
| Keera Ann Fox wrote:
> Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>
>
>>I argue with reason.
>
>
> Yes.
>
He makes it sooooo easy!
|
|
| | From: | Bob Officer | | Subject: | Re: This place is so over | | Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:56:44 -0800 |
|
|
| On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:52:29 +0100, in alt.astrology, skytten.fox@online.no
(Keera Ann Fox) wrote:
>Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>
>> I argue with reason.
>
>Yes.
She Shoots
She Scores...
--
Ak'toh'di
|
|
| | From: | Edmond Wollmann is a Convicted Criminal | | Subject: | Re: This place is so over | | Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:52:20 -0800 |
|
|
| Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>
> So this is how you treat the metally disturbed?
Admission of mental illness noted.
|
|
|
