 | Beep wrote:
> I often find hers "work for me", which I've always put down to being
> particularly sensitive to transits to my sun.
> But today's for me couldn't possibly be more wrong:
> "Today's Libra Horoscope
> September 23 - October 22
> January 19, 2005
> Ready for yet another day of passion, tender whispers and loving
> glances? Sure it's tedious, but you do have your reputation to think
> of, so you'll probably do your best and bear up under the pressure
> just fine. Oh, and by the way, this is brought to you courtesy of the
> stars, who have plenty more of it in store. Yep. Sure is rough being
> you. Pardon your pals if they're not all that sympathetic to your
> plight."
> Yeah, right. I'm working on legal and financial crap as well as
> preparing for surgery. It's been just loads of fun. None of the
> lawyers or doctors seem to be thinking about running away with me,
and
> because I always hate being the only one in the hospital with no
> flowers my To Do list has an item to buy some for myself!
> Was your Kelli Fox accurate today? :) For FUN ONLY (yes this is a
> disclaimer), check it out:
>
http://horoscopes.astrology.com/index/dailylongindex.html?ice=3Dast,scopes,=
ltex
> Hugs,
> Pam
I read the Horoscope Magazine ones too just to see if they ever get it
right, they never are--but that's what happens when you do it for
commercial reasons, and "just for fun"--you get out what you have put
into it.
Astrology will never get anywhere like this, I have tried to tell the
astrolgical community for 30 years now, now I simply ignore most of
their blind efforts.
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
=A9 2005 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Articles http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/info.htm
Artworks http://www.e-wollmann.com/TOC.htm
|
|
