knowledge-database (beta)

Current group: aus.flame.

Re: Boycott a.c.t-b

Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Jura Koch-Sacher
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Jura Koch-Sacher
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Jura Koch-Sacher
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Jura Koch-Sacher
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs Noises
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
fasgnâdh
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
fasgnâdh
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
fasgnâdh
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs Noises
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Cate McKew
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Bignoters and self-promoters in aus.politics and aus.flame  
fasgnâdh
 Re: Bignoters and self-promoters in aus.politics and aus.flame  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs Noises
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Cate McKew
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
zippy
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Cate McKew
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
zippy
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
zippy
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
zippy
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Martin Bodenstedt
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Wally Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
zippy
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
zippy
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Wally Latham
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Martin Bodenstedt
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
David Wagner
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
David Wagner
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
David Wagner
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Wally Latham
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Boxer
 Re: Solution for safe internet voting - was Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
zippy
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Martin Bodenstedt
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
fasgnâdh
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
fasgnâdh
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
fasgnâdh
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Cate McKew
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Cate McKew
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Cate McKew
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
fasgnâdh
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 The long term unemployed seem testy today. They must be out of booze.  
Mark Addinall
 Re: The long term unemployed seem testy today. They must be out  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Seppo Renfors
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Seppo Renfors
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Seppo Renfors
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs Noises
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs Noises
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
RT
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
RT
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs Noises
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
RT
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
From:Jura Koch-Sacher
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:06:07 +1100
[a.c.t-b removed due to thread subject]
"Addinall" wrote in message
<1103019517.559963.233930@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:

>Jura Koch-Sacher wrote:
>> "Tomasso vs Noises" wrote in message
>> :
>>
>> >"Ned Latham" wrote in message
>news:slrncrs0uq.62k.ned@arthur.valhalla.oz...
>> >> "Jura Koch-Sacher" wrote in
>:
>> >Whar species?
>> >
>> Ned? Pan troglodytes, AFAICT. He's an intellectual pygmy and looks
>> like a chimp.
>
>Oi! I have good information, anecdotal and documented, that cousin
>Pan troglodytes are very astute at opening boxes. Look ye lower on
>the phylogeny.
>
>Slime mold?
>
On second thoughts I suggest Brachychiton acerifolium, the flame-tree,
because AFAICT he's out of his flaming tree.
From:Mark Addinall
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:23:27 GMT

"Jura Koch-Sacher" wrote in message
news:ukqtr0lsqkvfu5pvralpjf9rrdnvtj8tna@4ax.com...
> [a.c.t-b removed due to thread subject]

Back in. Might as well give the locals a laugh, and the MISTER RICE!
a chance at an education.

> "Addinall" wrote in message
> <1103019517.559963.233930@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:
>
>>Jura Koch-Sacher wrote:
>>> "Tomasso vs Noises" wrote in message
>>> :
>>>
>>> >"Ned Latham" wrote in message
>>news:slrncrs0uq.62k.ned@arthur.valhalla.oz...
>>> >> "Jura Koch-Sacher" wrote in
>>:
>>> >Whar species?
>>> >
>>> Ned? Pan troglodytes, AFAICT. He's an intellectual pygmy and looks
>>> like a chimp.
>>
>>Oi! I have good information, anecdotal and documented, that cousin
>>Pan troglodytes are very astute at opening boxes. Look ye lower on
>>the phylogeny.
>>
>>Slime mold?
>>
> On second thoughts I suggest Brachychiton acerifolium, the flame-tree,
> because AFAICT he's out of his flaming tree.

Spirometra erinacei

Mark (true-blue) Addinall.
From:Jura Koch-Sacher
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:32:36 +1100
"Mark Addinall" wrote in message
:

>
>"Jura Koch-Sacher" wrote in message
>news:ukqtr0lsqkvfu5pvralpjf9rrdnvtj8tna@4ax.com...
>> [a.c.t-b removed due to thread subject]
>
>Back in.

No probs. I'm subbed to a.c.t-b now, and it makes a good pre-filter
for aus.politics.

> Might as well give the locals a laugh, and the MISTER RICE!
>a chance at an education.
>
You realise that makes us mister-baiters? As for educating Ned and his
fellow Landgoons... you're obviously more of an optimist than I.

>> "Addinall" wrote in message
>> <1103019517.559963.233930@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>>>Jura Koch-Sacher wrote:
>>>> "Tomasso vs Noises" wrote in message
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>> >Whar species?
>>>> >
>>>> Ned? Pan troglodytes, AFAICT. He's an intellectual pygmy and looks
>>>> like a chimp.
>>>
>>>Oi! I have good information, anecdotal and documented, that cousin
>>>Pan troglodytes are very astute at opening boxes. Look ye lower on
>>>the phylogeny.
>>>
>>>Slime mold?
>>>
>> On second thoughts I suggest Brachychiton acerifolium, the flame-tree,
>> because AFAICT he's out of his flaming tree.
>
>Spirometra erinacei
>
(/me looks up Google) Bingo. An irritating, gutless parasite; that's
Ned to a tee.
From:Mark Addinall
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:12:16 GMT

"Jura Koch-Sacher" wrote in message
news:vvh2s0h4v998sk92d83qa8q9dpsim9c6ql@4ax.com...
> "Mark Addinall" wrote in message
> :
>
>>
>>"Jura Koch-Sacher" wrote in message
>>news:ukqtr0lsqkvfu5pvralpjf9rrdnvtj8tna@4ax.com...
>>> [a.c.t-b removed due to thread subject]
>>
>>Back in.
>
> No probs. I'm subbed to a.c.t-b now, and it makes a good pre-filter
> for aus.politics.

It is fun. Noddy must spend a fortune typing "nothing relevant" over and
over and over again! He's too stupid to write a bot!

Dave Moss had a good NoddBot running, I wonder where that is?

>
>> Might as well give the locals a laugh, and the MISTER RICE!
>>a chance at an education.
>>
> You realise that makes us mister-baiters? As for educating Ned and his
> fellow Landgoons... you're obviously more of an optimist than I.

Amusment. I have never ectually met someone as thick as noddy before.

>
>>> "Addinall" wrote in message
>>> <1103019517.559963.233930@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:
>>>
>>>>Jura Koch-Sacher wrote:
>>>>> "Tomasso vs Noises" wrote in message
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>> >Whar species?
>>>>> >
>>>>> Ned? Pan troglodytes, AFAICT. He's an intellectual pygmy and looks
>>>>> like a chimp.
>>>>
>>>>Oi! I have good information, anecdotal and documented, that cousin
>>>>Pan troglodytes are very astute at opening boxes. Look ye lower on
>>>>the phylogeny.
>>>>
>>>>Slime mold?
>>>>
>>> On second thoughts I suggest Brachychiton acerifolium, the flame-tree,
>>> because AFAICT he's out of his flaming tree.
>>
>>Spirometra erinacei
>>
> (/me looks up Google) Bingo. An irritating, gutless parasite; that's
> Ned to a tee.

Yep. Can be found suckin a dogs arse.

Mark (true-blue) Addinall.
From:Ned Latham
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:19 Dec 2004 13:39:27 +1050
Muck Addinall, the last surviving specimen of Homo Defectus, wrote
in :

Nothing relevant to act-b.

> It is fun. Noddy must spend a fortune typing "nothing relevant" over and
> over and over again!

Wrong again, moron. I have permission to type on the cheap.

> He's too stupid to write a bot!

That'll be why you're obsessed with me, and *still* haven't managed
to get your revenge for that little embarrassment I dished out to
you over four years ago?

Pathetic.

----lies, filth and flatulent bragging snipped----

Piss off, troll.

Ned
--
True Blue FAQ:
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7
From:Mark Addinall
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:10:27 GMT

"Jura Koch-Sacher" wrote in message
news:vvh2s0h4v998sk92d83qa8q9dpsim9c6ql@4ax.com...
> "Mark Addinall" wrote in message
> :
>
>>
>>"Jura Koch-Sacher" wrote in message
>>news:ukqtr0lsqkvfu5pvralpjf9rrdnvtj8tna@4ax.com...
>>> [a.c.t-b removed due to thread subject]
>>
>>Back in.
>
> No probs. I'm subbed to a.c.t-b now, and it makes a good pre-filter
> for aus.politics.


WELL, YOU BEING A BASTARD LEFTY jOO WOULD NOT
KNOW THE TRUE MEENING OF AUS CULKTURE!

Hi Iser, long time no see. Doing anything interesting?

>
>> Might as well give the locals a laugh, and the MISTER RICE!
>>a chance at an education.
>>
> You realise that makes us mister-baiters?

Good God. I hand't thought about that....

>As for educating Ned and his
> fellow Landgoons... you're obviously more of an optimist than I.

Oi...

>
>>> "Addinall" wrote in message
>>> <1103019517.559963.233930@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:
>>>
>>>>Jura Koch-Sacher wrote:
>>>>> "Tomasso vs Noises" wrote in message
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>> >Whar species?
>>>>> >
>>>>> Ned? Pan troglodytes, AFAICT. He's an intellectual pygmy and looks
>>>>> like a chimp.
>>>>
>>>>Oi! I have good information, anecdotal and documented, that cousin
>>>>Pan troglodytes are very astute at opening boxes. Look ye lower on
>>>>the phylogeny.
>>>>
>>>>Slime mold?
>>>>
>>> On second thoughts I suggest Brachychiton acerifolium, the flame-tree,
>>> because AFAICT he's out of his flaming tree.
>>
>>Spirometra erinacei
>>
> (/me looks up Google) Bingo. An irritating, gutless parasite; that's
> Ned to a tee.


Seems to me.

Warning, as aus.flame used to be a bit amusing, noddy is not. He will
follow
all of your posts and declare you not "sumtingorother". You can argue,
perhaps, but it is like arguing with an autistic child hidden in an aging
and
feeble body. We should pity him.


Nah, fuck the retard.

Nice to see you back on UUCP ;-)

Mark (true-blue, or True-Blue, or perhaps true-Bloo) Addinall.
From:Jura Koch-Sacher
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Fri, 17 Dec 2004 22:45:33 +1100
"Mark Addinall" wrote in message
:

>
>"Jura Koch-Sacher" wrote in message
>news:vvh2s0h4v998sk92d83qa8q9dpsim9c6ql@4ax.com...
>> "Mark Addinall" wrote in message
>> :
>>
>>>
>>>"Jura Koch-Sacher" wrote in message
>>>news:ukqtr0lsqkvfu5pvralpjf9rrdnvtj8tna@4ax.com...
>>>> [a.c.t-b removed due to thread subject]
>>>
>>>Back in.
>>
>> No probs. I'm subbed to a.c.t-b now, and it makes a good pre-filter
>> for aus.politics.
>
>
>WELL, YOU BEING A BASTARD LEFTY jOO WOULD NOT
>KNOW THE TRUE MEENING OF AUS CULKTURE!
>
I'm always willing to learn, especially from a self-professed 'expert'
like Ned.

>Hi Iser, long time no see. Doing anything interesting?
>
If I was doing anything interesting, I wouldn't be here yanking Ned's
chains. It's cheap entertainment - barely.
[-- 8< --]
From:Ned Latham
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:19 Dec 2004 13:40:58 +1050
Jura Koch-Sacher wrote in <85h5s055tj4bsamkp6si4uljqbgp3ugibh@4ax.com>:

Nothing relevant to act-b.

----snip----

> If I was doing anything interesting, I wouldn't be here yanking Ned's
> chains. It's cheap entertainment - barely.

Take your sooking about the poverty of your existence to some place
where people give a shit, loser.

Or even better, get a life.

+++

Oh, and... piss off, troll.

Ned
--
True Blue FAQ:
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7
From:Jura Koch-Sacher
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:45:54 +1100
ned@arthur.valhalla.oz (Ned Latham) wrote in message
:

>Jura Koch-Sacher wrote in <85h5s055tj4bsamkp6si4uljqbgp3ugibh@4ax.com>:
>
>Nothing relevant to act-b.
>
>----snip----
>
>> If I was doing anything interesting, I wouldn't be here yanking Ned's
>> chains. It's cheap entertainment - barely.
>
>Take your sooking about the poverty of your existence to some place
>where people give a shit, loser.
>
So you don't appreciate my subtle self-deprecating sense of humour,
then? Your loss.

>Or even better, get a life.
>
So says someone who spends their days typing "nothing relevant to
act-b" and "piss off, troll" ad nauseam. PKB.
>
>Oh, and... piss off, troll.
>
To quote myself...
Message-ID:
"'Troll', in Nedspeak, apparently means 'anyone who disagrees with
me'." Thanks for reverting to type.
From:Ned Latham
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:23 Dec 2004 10:57:29 +1050
Jura Koch-Sacher wrote in <1o7ds05j4a3p3lsijvg02khcjek6e32838@4ax.com>:
> ned@arthur.valhalla.oz (Ned Latham) wrote in message
> :
>
> > Jura Koch-Sacher wrote in <85h5s055tj4bsamkp6si4uljqbgp3ugibh@4ax.com>:
> >
> > Nothing relevant to act-b.
> >
> > ----snip----
> >
> > > If I was doing anything interesting, I wouldn't be here yanking Ned's
> > > chains. It's cheap entertainment - barely.
> >
> > Take your sooking about the poverty of your existence to some place
> > where people give a shit, loser.
>
> So you don't appreciate my subtle self-deprecating sense of humour,

LOL. Your feeble attempt to make yourself feel better by trying to denigrate
someone else, more like.

> then? Your loss.

I'll live with it.

> > Or even better, get a life.
>
> So says someone who spends their days typing "nothing relevant to
> act-b" and "piss off, troll" ad nauseam. PKB.

I don't claim it as a necessary relief from boredom, loser.

> > Oh, and... piss off, troll.
>
> To quote myself...

....making a statement of which you yourself were a contradiction...

> Message-ID:
> "'Troll', in Nedspeak, apparently means 'anyone who disagrees with
> me'." Thanks for reverting to type.

Pffft. Get yourself an honesty implant, liar.

Ned
--
True Blue FAQ:
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7
From:Ned Latham
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:17 Dec 2004 12:58:19 +1050
Muck Addinall, the last surviving specimen of Homo Defectus, wrote
in :

Nothing on charter for act-b.

----snip----

> Warning, as aus.flame used to be a bit amusing, noddy is not.

You don't get amusement from the English lessons I give you?

As, for example, in <982143406.702660@draal2.apex.net.au>:

> * > You don't seem to mind mixing those metaphors do you?
> *
> * Nothing wrong with mixing metaphors, you braindead lump of dogshit.

> He will
> follow all of your posts and declare you not "sumtingorother".

Everyone is "not sumtingorother". You, for example, are not worthy of
respect.

----snip----

Piss off, troll.

Ned
--
True Blue FAQ:
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7
From:Mark Addinall
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:07:34 GMT

"Ned Latham" wrote in message
news:slrncs4h23.49r.ned@arthur.valhalla.oz...
> Muck Addinall, the last surviving specimen of Homo Defectus, wrote
> in :
>
> Nothing on charter for act-b.
>
> ----snip----
>
>> Warning, as aus.flame used to be a bit amusing, noddy is not.
>
> You don't get amusement from the English lessons I give you?

ROTFLMFAO!

>
> As, for example, in <982143406.702660@draal2.apex.net.au>:
>
>> * > You don't seem to mind mixing those metaphors do you?
>> *
>> * Nothing wrong with mixing metaphors, you braindead lump of dogshit.

It was so cold last night I had to throw another blanket on the fire.
(Robert Northrop)

Which way are the tea leaves blowing? (Doug James)

Time rolled up like a scroll, while the plague nibbled at the edges of their
years. (Timothy Cleary's student, not necessarily the same one)

You've buttered your bread, now lie in it. (An acquantance of Saupe's
long-lost friend Attila the Nun)

Clearly we've opened a pandora's box of worms here. (David Yates)

Burning the midnight oil at both ends - From a radio commercial (Nathan
Roberts)

Marching to the beat of a dead horse - Someone's definition of fanaticism
(Nathan Roberts)

"The Loafing Class," by David Horowitz (Salon, February 8, 1998), begins:
"Shiftless, lazy good-for-nothings? Try the richly paid leftist professors
securely ensconced in their irrelevant ivory towers." In the penultimate
paragraph, he offers this memorable image:
"Neither do they, like Aronowitz and his armchair comrades, tilt at the
windmills of a capitalist patriarchy from whose teat they feed,
trampling on academic standards and abusing the educational aspirations of
their young charges." (Contributed by Jim Vanden Bosch)

(taht one sounded like Nev, the Vietnam Vet that can't remember his unit or
service number)

In the New York Times on the Web "Current Cinema" forum, someone
contributing to a thread on "As Good as it Gets" offered up this
gem with regard to the performances of the actors in that film: "If [Jack]
Nicholson was the peanut butter and [Helen] Hunt was the jelly,
[Greg] Kinnear was the bread, drawing the two together in a bear hug."
Yikes. (Dennis Holtrop)

Years ago, I heard a politician deny he was threatening a certain action by
saying, "I don't want to hold an open manhole over your head." (James Breig)

We'll burn those bridges when we get to them. (Daniel Willis)

Burning the midnight oil at both ends

Grasping at the straw that broke the camel's back

It's time to step up to the plate and cut the mustard

Beware my friend...you are skating on hot water (from a movie)

Robbing Peter to pay the piper

Taking the bull with both feet


All "Nedlish" FACTS!



>
>> He will
>> follow all of your posts and declare you not "sumtingorother".


Ah, noddy. You truly are stupid!

Mark (true-blue) Addinall.
From:Tomasso vs noise
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:35:01 GMT

"Mark Addinall" wrote:
> Which way are the tea leaves blowing? (Doug James)

Well, that one is poetic (to my ears). Reminds me of something...

The rest kind of paint the whole (sad) picture.

Tomasso.

PS: Missed Wiley (both of us were too busy with necessary minor things).
From:Ned Latham
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:19 Dec 2004 13:38:42 +1050
"Tomasso vs noise" wrote
in :

Nothing relevant to act-b.

> Mark Addinall wrote:
> >
> > Which way are the tea leaves blowing? (Doug James)
>
> Well, that one is poetic (to my ears). Reminds me of something...

Shotgun methods of "prediction", such as used by that lunatic
you lot are presently filling in for?

----snip----

Ned
--
True Blue FAQ:
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7
From:Tomasso vs noise
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Sun, 19 Dec 2004 03:52:31 GMT

"Ned Latham" wrote in message =
news:slrncs9s5q.9ee.ned@arthur.valhalla.oz...
> "Tomasso vs noise" wrote
> in :
>=20
> Nothing relevant to act-b.
>=20
>> Mark Addinall wrote:
>> >
>> > Which way are the tea leaves blowing? (Doug James)
>>
>> Well, that one is poetic (to my ears). Reminds me of something...
>=20
> Shotgun methods of "prediction", such as used by that lunatic
> you lot are presently filling in for?

You may well be right Ned.=20

There's not much substance to discuss around here at the moment, just
some ranting old farts and sock puppets.

Maybe the time of year, or closing off of topics since the Eureka Anniv.

On the Telstra topic, I've been wondering for a while what a sensible
"Telstra Rural" would look like, and how you would measure KPIs. My
rural mates (and I do have some) have been very disappointed - and
even moreso by the hype and bullshit, than the lack of services.

[I mean, it's about bandwidth, access, support, responsivenss and =
customising
services to actual need (and determining that need). I guess it's about =
price
as well, but NEW infrastructure is cheaper than ever].

Tomasso.
From:Ned Latham
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:21 Dec 2004 10:39:33 +1050
"Tomasso vs noise" wrote
in <3W6xd.78415$K7.13067@news-server.bigpond.net.au>:
> Ned Latham wrote:
> > "Tomasso vs noise" wrote:
> > > Mark Addinall wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Which way are the tea leaves blowing? (Doug James)
> > >
> > > Well, that one is poetic (to my ears). Reminds me of something...
> >
> > Shotgun methods of "prediction", such as used by that lunatic
> > you lot are presently filling in for?
>
> You may well be right Ned.
>
> There's not much substance to discuss around here at the moment, just
> some ranting old farts and sock puppets.
>
> Maybe the time of year, or closing off of topics since the Eureka Anniv.

No, it's control over topicality, exerted by the media and by political
agenda-setting. We discuss (some of) the problems created by our rulers,
but we don't discuss the problem of our rulers and the system they
employ for maintaining their power. That's partly because there're only
two political entities capable of forming government, and both of them
depend on that system.

The result is that most of us (millions of us) either despair of ever
improving matters, or fritter our energies away on bandaid solutions
to casual problems rather than seeking substantive solutions to the
causal problems.

> On the Telstra topic, I've been wondering for a while what a sensible
> "Telstra Rural" would look like,

The old PMG. Including the postal and miscellaneous services.

> and how you would measure KPIs.

What are KPIs?

> My rural mates (and I do have some) have been very disappointed - and
> even moreso by the hype and bullshit, than the lack of services.
>
> [I mean, it's about bandwidth, access, support, responsivenss and
> customising services to actual need (and determining that need).
> I guess it's about price as well, but NEW infrastructure is cheaper
> than ever].

Only some. More than anything else, rural services need connectivity
infrastructures. What cables are in place are inadequate and well past
their use-by dates anyway (I've seen telephone cables so corroded that
they fracture when lifted). But they'll be expensive to replace. It
would be less expensive to put a satellite up, but it's still a big
outlay.

And it won't happen. Telstra isn't about services, it's about profit.
Investing in infrastructure won't provide the fat bottom line to attract
investors.

As with our other alienated national assets, the privateers are living
off the capital our ancestors worked so hard to produce. The hole we're
in is getting deeper all the time.

Ned
--
True Blue FAQ:
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7
From:Tomasso vs Noises
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Tue, 21 Dec 2004 00:33:57 GMT


"Ned Latham" wrote in message =
news:slrncseqdt.c1n.ned@arthur.valhalla.oz...
> "Tomasso vs noise" wrote
> ...
>> On the Telstra topic, I've been wondering for a while what a sensible
>> "Telstra Rural" would look like,
>=20
> The old PMG. Including the postal and miscellaneous services.
>=20
>> and how you would measure KPIs.
>=20
> What are KPIs?

Mangement terminology. "Key Performance Indicators". Ie, how they can
measure that they are achieving something (the myth), or how they =
justify
a pay rise or promotion (the reality).

Often is a flawed implementation of "accountability", because they =
people
who are being measured, are also setting up the measurement process.=20
[A bit like the Peter Principle, where "incompetence" because a badge
for anyone above a certain level. V=E1clav Havel has written some =
insightful
articles, and even a play on this].

>> My rural mates (and I do have some) have been very disappointed - and
>> even moreso by the hype and bullshit, than the lack of services.
>>
>> [I mean, it's about bandwidth, access, support, responsivenss and
>> customising services to actual need (and determining that need).
>> I guess it's about price as well, but NEW infrastructure is cheaper
>> than ever].
>=20
> Only some. More than anything else, rural services need connectivity
> infrastructures. What cables are in place are inadequate and well past
> their use-by dates anyway (I've seen telephone cables so corroded that
> they fracture when lifted). But they'll be expensive to replace. It
> would be less expensive to put a satellite up, but it's still a big
> outlay.

I haven't read a document on internet and comms Demand (projections
for the future) for rural. It's remiss of me not to have looked around
(I have read demand projections on Electricity, but just not been
in the rural telco services loop).=20

> And it won't happen. Telstra isn't about services, it's about profit.
> Investing in infrastructure won't provide the fat bottom line to =
attract
> investors.

Comes back to KPIs, and Shareholder Value (ie, dividends and share
price trends). A sorry mess for most telcos. For monopolies (which
Telstra is for network), it's a joke. BUT changes are afoot. Including
huge growth in mobiles, Samuels in ACCC paying more attention than
I expected, Voice over Internet, and new infrastructure (cable/MW/etc)
being far tidier and cheaper. I recall that Greece now has fantastic =
telco
because they didn't have much old crap to replace, and started with
a (fairly) clean slate.

> As with our other alienated national assets, the privateers are living
> off the capital our ancestors worked so hard to produce. The hole =
we're
> in is getting deeper all the time.

Agreed.=20

Tomasso.
From:Mark Addinall
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:24:38 GMT

"Tomasso vs Noises" wrote in message
news:VbKxd.82483$K7.69078@news-server.bigpond.net.au...


"Ned Latham" wrote in message
news:slrncseqdt.c1n.ned@arthur.valhalla.oz...
> "Tomasso vs noise" wrote
> ...
>> On the Telstra topic, I've been wondering for a while what a sensible
>> "Telstra Rural" would look like,
>
> The old PMG. Including the postal and miscellaneous services.
>
>> and how you would measure KPIs.
>
> What are KPIs?

Mangement terminology. "Key Performance Indicators". Ie, how they can
measure that they are achieving something (the myth), or how they justify
a pay rise or promotion (the reality).

Often is a flawed implementation of "accountability", because they people
who are being measured, are also setting up the measurement process.
[A bit like the Peter Principle, where "incompetence" because a badge
for anyone above a certain level. Václav Havel has written some insightful
articles, and even a play on this].

>> My rural mates (and I do have some) have been very disappointed - and
>> even moreso by the hype and bullshit, than the lack of services.
>>
>> [I mean, it's about bandwidth, access, support, responsivenss and
>> customising services to actual need (and determining that need).
>> I guess it's about price as well, but NEW infrastructure is cheaper
>> than ever].
>
> Only some. More than anything else, rural services need connectivity
> infrastructures. What cables are in place are inadequate and well past
> their use-by dates anyway (I've seen telephone cables so corroded that
> they fracture when lifted). But they'll be expensive to replace. It
> would be less expensive to put a satellite up, but it's still a big
> outlay.

I haven't read a document on internet and comms Demand (projections
for the future) for rural. It's remiss of me not to have looked around
(I have read demand projections on Electricity, but just not been
in the rural telco services loop).

> And it won't happen. Telstra isn't about services, it's about profit.
> Investing in infrastructure won't provide the fat bottom line to attract
> investors.

Comes back to KPIs, and Shareholder Value (ie, dividends and share
price trends). A sorry mess for most telcos. For monopolies (which
Telstra is for network), it's a joke. BUT changes are afoot. Including
huge growth in mobiles, Samuels in ACCC paying more attention than
I expected, Voice over Internet, and new infrastructure (cable/MW/etc)
being far tidier and cheaper. I recall that Greece now has fantastic telco
because they didn't have much old crap to replace, and started with
a (fairly) clean slate.