knowledge-database (beta)

Current group: aus.flame

Re: Boycott a.c.t-b

Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Jura Koch-Sacher
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Jura Koch-Sacher
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Mark Addinall
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Tomasso vs noise
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Ned Latham
 Re: Boycott a.c.t-b  
Harry Snape
From:Jura Koch-Sacher
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Fri, 17 Dec 2004 22:45:32 +1100
[a.c.t-b back in]
ned@arthur.valhalla.oz (Ned 'Spirometra erinacei' Latham) wrote in
message :

>Jura Koch-Sacher wrote in :
>
>A personal attack.

Diddums not like being called an "irritating, gutless parasite", then?
Good.

> Nothing relevant to act-b.
>
Au contraire, Spirometra Man. *Anything* critical of you, including
"personal ataacks", is on-topic there. It's your personal playpen,
after all.

>Piss off, troll.
>
Temper, temper!
From:Ned Latham
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:19 Dec 2004 13:40:17 +1050
Jura Koch-Sacher wrote in :

Nothing relevant to act-b.

> (Ned 'Spirometra erinacei' Latham) wrote:
> > Jura Koch-Sacher wrote:
> >
> > A personal attack.
>
> Diddums not like being called an "irritating, gutless parasite", then?

I dislike lies, liar.

> Good.

So why do you lie?

> > Nothing relevant to act-b.
>
> Au contraire, Spirometra Man. *Anything* critical of you, including
> "personal ataacks", is on-topic there.

Wrong again, liar. The newsgroup is chartered for discussion of matters
pertaining to True Blue, not me, and not personal attacks, whether I am
the target or not.

> It's your personal playpen,
> after all.

Wrong again, liar.

And hypocrite. You lot have falsely accused me of making that sort
of claim and tried to slag me off on account of it. Who the fuck
do you think you are, to pretend now that you accept that false
notion?

----snip----

The message you followed up wasn't posted into act-b, troll.
So why did you add act-b to the Newsgroups header?

Oh, that's right: you're a troll.

Piss off, troll.

Ned
--
True Blue FAQ:
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7
From:Jura Koch-Sacher
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:46:07 +1100
ned@arthur.valhalla.oz (Ned Latham) wrote in message
:

>Jura Koch-Sacher wrote in :
>
>Nothing relevant to act-b.
>
>> (Ned 'Spirometra erinacei' Latham) wrote:
>> > Jura Koch-Sacher wrote:
>> >
>> > A personal attack.
>>
>> Diddums not like being called an "irritating, gutless parasite", then?
>
>I dislike lies, liar.
>
....and metaphors are apparently beyond your limited level of
comprehension, namecaller.

>> Good.
>
>So why do you lie?
>
From the Dictionary Of Nedspeak, 0th Edition:
lie, n. a statement Ned disagrees with.

>> > Nothing relevant to act-b.
>>
>> Au contraire, Spirometra Man. *Anything* critical of you, including
>> "personal ataacks", is on-topic there.
>
>Wrong again, liar. The newsgroup is chartered for discussion of matters
>pertaining to True Blue, not me, and not personal attacks, whether I am
>the target or not.
>
"True Blue"... as defined by you, that is. Geez, but you're a control
freak.

>> It's your personal playpen,
>> after all.
>
>Wrong again, liar.
>
I call 'em as I see 'em, namecaller.

>And hypocrite. You lot have falsely accused me of making that sort
>of claim and tried to slag me off on account of it.

Well, if you don't like it, the solution is simple: drop the "Nothing
relevant to act-b", learn how to use a killfile and stop kidding
yourself that you're the "defender" of the group. Obviously you have
no idea how silly you appear when you make such a claim.

> Who the fuck>do you think you are,

I'm me; no "think" about it. Got a birth certificate to prove it and
everything.

>to pretend now that you accept that false>notion?
>
I call 'em as I see 'em.
[-- 8< --]
From:Ned Latham
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:23 Dec 2004 11:26:59 +1050
Jura Koch-Sacher wrote in :
> Ned Latham wrote:
> > Jura Koch-Sacher wrote:
> > > (Ned 'Spirometra erinacei' Latham) wrote:
> > > > Jura Koch-Sacher wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A personal attack.
> > >
> > > Diddums not like being called an "irritating, gutless parasite", then?
> >
> > I dislike lies, liar.
> >
> ...and metaphors are apparently beyond your limited level of
> comprehension, namecaller.

What's "apparent" to you is of no interest to me.

> > > Good.
> >
> > So why do you lie?
> >
> > From the Dictionary Of Nedspeak, 0th Edition:
>
> lie, n. a statement Ned disagrees with.

False. I've been known to disgree with statements that I don't call
lies.

The opposite probably isn't true, but that doesn't make your sleazy
little pseudo-definition correct.

> > > > Nothing relevant to act-b.
> > >
> > > Au contraire, Spirometra Man. *Anything* critical of you, including
> > > "personal ataacks", is on-topic there.
> >
> > Wrong again, liar. The newsgroup is chartered for discussion of matters
> > pertaining to True Blue, not me, and not personal attacks, whether I am
> > the target or not.
>
> "True Blue"... as defined by you, that is.

Wrong again, liar. It defines itself.

> Geez, but you're a control
> freak.

Yair, yair. Why is it that you depend so heavily on lies, evasions,
misrepresentations and dysphemisms again?

> > > It's your personal playpen,
> > > after all.
> >
> > Wrong again, liar.
>
> I call 'em as I see 'em, namecaller.

No you don't. You call 'em as you wish 'em to be seen.

> > And hypocrite. You lot have falsely accused me of making that sort
> > of claim and tried to slag me off on account of it.
>
> Well, if you don't like it, the solution is simple: drop the "Nothing
> relevant to act-b", learn how to use a killfile and stop kidding
> yourself that you're the "defender" of the group.

So you want to blame me for you lot having made that false accusation?
Jesus, what a moral maggot you are.

---evasions and lie snipped----

Ned
--
True Blue FAQ:
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7
From:Mark Addinall
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:31:38 GMT

"Jura Koch-Sacher" wrote in message
news:br35s0lh4ur6jj444q949vqpq2rluqtddg@4ax.com...
> [a.c.t-b back in]
> ned@arthur.valhalla.oz (Ned 'Spirometra erinacei' Latham) wrote in


I like that John. Can I have an "et al"?

> message :
>
>>Jura Koch-Sacher wrote in :
>>
>>A personal attack.
>
> Diddums not like being called an "irritating, gutless parasite", then?
> Good.
>
>> Nothing relevant to act-b.
>>
> Au contraire, Spirometra Man. *Anything* critical of you, including
> "personal ataacks", is on-topic there. It's your personal playpen,
> after all.
>
>>Piss off, troll.
>>
> Temper, temper!

It's his only contribution to USENET!

I hope tomasso gets bored and remembers a geometrical flame. I liked those.

TarTar,
Mark (true-blue) Addinall.
From:Ned Latham
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:19 Dec 2004 13:55:38 +1050
"Mark Addinall" wrote in <_cBwd.76316$K7.69728@news-server.bigpond.net.au>:

Nothing relevant to act-b.

----snip----

> I hope tomasso gets bored and remembers a geometrical flame. I liked those.

Speshly the isosceles triangle ones, huh? Coz they match your head?

----flatulent bragging snipped----

Piss off, troll.

Ned
--
True Blue FAQ:
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7
From:Tomasso vs noise
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Sat, 18 Dec 2004 04:01:02 GMT

"Mark Addinall" wrote:
> "Jura Koch-Sacher" wrote:
>> [a.c.t-b back in]
>> ned@arthur.valhalla.oz (Ned 'Spirometra erinacei' Latham) wrote in
> ...
> I hope tomasso gets bored and remembers a geometrical flame. I liked =
those.

Something along the lines of topological transformations of the =
patho-linguistic
landscape of aus.cultural.thuish-bluish posters? [I may need a short =
holiday
before I can write something impressive for Mark].

As a disingenuous herd of agony aunts with a mission (from a narrow =
backwater
of an inbred gene pool), they still struggle to identify who should be =
their leader,
and how they can exploit the spoils of their successful grab for power.=20

What confounds me is how they manage to procreate at all?=20

Re: Bigotry - Nature or Nurture? [Not a simple question].

Pond scum, and a few mosquito wrigglers?

Tomasso.
From:Ned Latham
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:19 Dec 2004 14:27:33 +1050
"Tomasso vs noise" wrote in <2YNwd.76806$K7.38890@news-server.bigpond.net.au>:

Nothing relevant to act-b.

> Mark Addinall wrote:

----snip----

> > I hope tomasso gets bored and remembers a geometrical flame.
> > I liked those.
>
> Something along the lines of topological transformations of the
> patho-linguistic landscape of aus.cultural.thuish-bluish posters?

Adding misrepresentation to your list of "accomplishments"?

> [I may need a short holiday before I can write something impressive
> for Mark].

LOL. That aside has achieved it.

----wishful thinking snipped----

Ned
--
True Blue FAQ:
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7
From:Harry Snape
Subject:Re: Boycott a.c.t-b
Date:Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:38:42 +1100
Tomasso vs noise wrote:
> "Mark Addinall" wrote:
>
>>"Jura Koch-Sacher" wrote:
>>
>>>[a.c.t-b back in]
>>>ned@arthur.valhalla.oz (Ned 'Spirometra erinacei' Latham) wrote in
>>
>>...
>>I hope tomasso gets bored and remembers a geometrical flame. I liked those.
>
>
> Something along the lines of topological transformations of the patho-linguistic
> landscape of aus.cultural.thuish-bluish posters? [I may need a short holiday
> before I can write something impressive for Mark].
>
> As a disingenuous herd of agony aunts with a mission (from a narrow backwater
> of an inbred gene pool), they still struggle to identify who should be their leader,
> and how they can exploit the spoils of their successful grab for power.
>
> What confounds me is how they manage to procreate at all?

I'll give you a clue, they meet women. You should try it sometime.
Now I understand that you and Marky are quite happy with your current
approach, but there are many that will warn you that it will cause short
sightedness. And while I must applaud your novel approach of using
newsgroups as a means for electronic mutual masturbation it does quickly
wear thin.

> Re: Bigotry - Nature or Nurture? [Not a simple question].
>
> Pond scum, and a few mosquito wrigglers?
>
> Tomasso.
   

Copyright © 2006 knowledge-database   -   All rights reserved