|
|
 | | From: | Mark Addinall | | Subject: | Re: Boycott a.c.t-b | | Date: | Sat, 08 Jan 2005 08:44:21 GMT |
|
|
 |
"Harry Snape" wrote in message
news:41df927d$0$5383$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Cate McKew wrote:
>> "Ned Latham" wrote
>>
>>>Harry Snape wrote
>>>...
>>>
>>>>Are you claiming that Ned is really saying "It's easy - and I have a
>>>>number of unworkable soultions to prove it!"
>>>
>>>No, you idiot. He's saying that I showed an approach that could become
>>>a working solution.
>>>
>>>(Cate's going to be very miffed if she sees that "soultions" of yours
>>>Snake. She seemed to be getting quite warm and juicy over the idea
>>>that only she could get you typoing. Very crool of you to spoil her
>>>fun.)
>>
>>
>> Well, Ned, what can I say?
>>
>> This "drooling 'Harry' typos" situation hardly leads to any form of
>> arousal that I've noticed.
>
> Must be that boy/girl transformation you keep doing with Mark.
>
>> I once noticed that I had a shoe lace that undid itself of its own
>> accord. "Harry" is a LOT like that old lace.
>
>> So what did I do? An old "bushie" trick of dripping some wax on the lace,
>> and it held tight from then on (until I needed to yank the ends to get
>> the boot off).
>
> Most people get their mothers to teach them how to tie their laces
> properly. Probably to hard for you Mark.
>
>>
>> Trouble with "Harry" is I don't know where to drip the hot wax! :-). But
>> maybe when we find out, we can arrange a viewing.
>
> Poor Mark, he is starting to get so upset he is considering violence.
>
>>
>> OTOH, "Harry", aka "Wally" IS up to some naughtiness that I've noted
>> over in sci.crypt.
>>
>> He can't even seem to tell "upstream" from "downstream", and mangles many
>> lines of argument.
>
> Mark, just point out the lines. Surely you an do that? Or are you lying
> again.
>
>>
>> Regards, Cate.
>>
>> PS: And now Mr Fasgnag has this fantasy that I'm a "fat, spotty fifteen
>> year old geek", "doing a 'Harry Snape'" that I'm somehow "smart and
>> desirable". "Smart" and "desirable" are situated terms, and therefore
>> "off topic".
>
> I just think you like posting from Mark's machine, he really should learn
> something about online security.
Mark's on-line security is fine at the moment.
I haven't seen a Cate in my apartment (not that it would
be a bad thing), but perhaps, you should learn how to read headers.
You may (and many may) observe that we post from very
different locations.
"Harry", you are a moron.
Mark Addinall.
>
|
|
| | From: | zippy | | Subject: | Re: Boycott a.c.t-b | | Date: | Sat, 08 Jan 2005 03:41:10 -0800 |
|
|
|
Stop posting into sci.crypt, asshole.
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 08:44:21 GMT, "Mark Addinall"
wrote:
>
>"Harry Snape" wrote in message
>news:41df927d$0$5383$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>> Cate McKew wrote:
>>> "Ned Latham" wrote
>>>
>>>>Harry Snape wrote
>>>>...
>>>>
>>>>>Are you claiming that Ned is really saying "It's easy - and I have a
>>>>>number of unworkable soultions to prove it!"
>>>>
>>>>No, you idiot. He's saying that I showed an approach that could become
>>>>a working solution.
>>>>
>>>>(Cate's going to be very miffed if she sees that "soultions" of yours
>>>>Snake. She seemed to be getting quite warm and juicy over the idea
>>>>that only she could get you typoing. Very crool of you to spoil her
>>>>fun.)
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, Ned, what can I say?
>>>
>>> This "drooling 'Harry' typos" situation hardly leads to any form of
>>> arousal that I've noticed.
>>
>> Must be that boy/girl transformation you keep doing with Mark.
>>
>>> I once noticed that I had a shoe lace that undid itself of its own
>>> accord. "Harry" is a LOT like that old lace.
>>
>>> So what did I do? An old "bushie" trick of dripping some wax on the lace,
>>> and it held tight from then on (until I needed to yank the ends to get
>>> the boot off).
>>
>> Most people get their mothers to teach them how to tie their laces
>> properly. Probably to hard for you Mark.
>>
>>>
>>> Trouble with "Harry" is I don't know where to drip the hot wax! :-). But
>>> maybe when we find out, we can arrange a viewing.
>>
>> Poor Mark, he is starting to get so upset he is considering violence.
>>
>>>
>>> OTOH, "Harry", aka "Wally" IS up to some naughtiness that I've noted
>>> over in sci.crypt.
>>>
>>> He can't even seem to tell "upstream" from "downstream", and mangles many
>>> lines of argument.
>>
>> Mark, just point out the lines. Surely you an do that? Or are you lying
>> again.
>>
>>>
>>> Regards, Cate.
>>>
>>> PS: And now Mr Fasgnag has this fantasy that I'm a "fat, spotty fifteen
>>> year old geek", "doing a 'Harry Snape'" that I'm somehow "smart and
>>> desirable". "Smart" and "desirable" are situated terms, and therefore
>>> "off topic".
>>
>> I just think you like posting from Mark's machine, he really should learn
>> something about online security.
>
>
>Mark's on-line security is fine at the moment.
>I haven't seen a Cate in my apartment (not that it would
>be a bad thing), but perhaps, you should learn how to read headers.
>You may (and many may) observe that we post from very
>different locations.
>
>"Harry", you are a moron.
>
>Mark Addinall.
>
>>
>
|
|
| | From: | Mark Addinall | | Subject: | Re: Boycott a.c.t-b | | Date: | Sat, 08 Jan 2005 12:04:54 GMT |
|
|
|
"zippy" wrote in message
news:emhvt0peklcper4i808rbc956u9gu9tq1e@4ax.com...
>
>
> Stop posting into sci.crypt, asshole.
..--. -... ..-. / --..-- / .. -. / -.-- -. / ..-.
..--. -... -.-. -. --. -. / .. -... ...- / ..-. --. .-. ..-. ..-. ...-
>
>
>
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 08:44:21 GMT, "Mark Addinall"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Harry Snape" wrote in message
>>news:41df927d$0$5383$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> Cate McKew wrote:
>>>> "Ned Latham" wrote
>>>>
>>>>>Harry Snape wrote
>>>>>...
>>>>>
>>>>>>Are you claiming that Ned is really saying "It's easy - and I have a
>>>>>>number of unworkable soultions to prove it!"
>>>>>
>>>>>No, you idiot. He's saying that I showed an approach that could become
>>>>>a working solution.
>>>>>
>>>>>(Cate's going to be very miffed if she sees that "soultions" of yours
>>>>>Snake. She seemed to be getting quite warm and juicy over the idea
>>>>>that only she could get you typoing. Very crool of you to spoil her
>>>>>fun.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, Ned, what can I say?
>>>>
>>>> This "drooling 'Harry' typos" situation hardly leads to any form of
>>>> arousal that I've noticed.
>>>
>>> Must be that boy/girl transformation you keep doing with Mark.
>>>
>>>> I once noticed that I had a shoe lace that undid itself of its own
>>>> accord. "Harry" is a LOT like that old lace.
>>>
>>>> So what did I do? An old "bushie" trick of dripping some wax on the
>>>> lace,
>>>> and it held tight from then on (until I needed to yank the ends to get
>>>> the boot off).
>>>
>>> Most people get their mothers to teach them how to tie their laces
>>> properly. Probably to hard for you Mark.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Trouble with "Harry" is I don't know where to drip the hot wax! :-).
>>>> But
>>>> maybe when we find out, we can arrange a viewing.
>>>
>>> Poor Mark, he is starting to get so upset he is considering violence.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> OTOH, "Harry", aka "Wally" IS up to some naughtiness that I've noted
>>>> over in sci.crypt.
>>>>
>>>> He can't even seem to tell "upstream" from "downstream", and mangles
>>>> many
>>>> lines of argument.
>>>
>>> Mark, just point out the lines. Surely you an do that? Or are you lying
>>> again.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Cate.
>>>>
>>>> PS: And now Mr Fasgnag has this fantasy that I'm a "fat, spotty fifteen
>>>> year old geek", "doing a 'Harry Snape'" that I'm somehow "smart and
>>>> desirable". "Smart" and "desirable" are situated terms, and therefore
>>>> "off topic".
>>>
>>> I just think you like posting from Mark's machine, he really should
>>> learn
>>> something about online security.
>>
>>
>>Mark's on-line security is fine at the moment.
>>I haven't seen a Cate in my apartment (not that it would
>>be a bad thing), but perhaps, you should learn how to read headers.
>>You may (and many may) observe that we post from very
>>different locations.
>>
>>"Harry", you are a moron.
>>
>>Mark Addinall.
>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
| | From: | Harry Snape | | Subject: | Re: Boycott a.c.t-b | | Date: | Sat, 08 Jan 2005 23:21:12 +1100 |
|
|
| Mark Addinall wrote:
> "zippy" wrote in message
> news:emhvt0peklcper4i808rbc956u9gu9tq1e@4ax.com...
>
>>
>>Stop posting into sci.crypt, asshole.
>
>
> .--. -... ..-. / --..-- / .. -. / -.-- -. / ..-.
> .--. -... -.-. -. --. -. / .. -... ...- / ..-. --. .-. ..-. ..-. ...-
>
This is another example of Marky behaving like a child.
|
|
|
