 | | From: | Theo Bekkers | | Subject: | For Smack | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:07:11 +0800 |
|
|
 | From aus.bicycles.
"I rode smack into the back of a parked bug once, not so much head down as mind absent."
Sounds like Smack. :-)
Theo
|
|
 | | From: | Knobdoodle | | Subject: | Re: For Smack | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:50:14 +1000 |
|
|
 | X-No-archive: yes Theo Bekkers wrote in message <41f0568c$1@news.bekkers.com.au>... >From aus.bicycles. > >"I rode smack into the back of a parked bug once, not so much head down >as mind absent." > Pfft; I bet there was heaps of blokes who rode Smack in the back of a parked car in the 70s! How could you resist a pretty blonde like that?!!? Clem
|
|
 | | From: | Nev.. | | Subject: | Re: For Smack | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:58:00 +1100 |
|
|
 | Knobdoodle wrote: > > X-No-archive: yes > Theo Bekkers wrote in message <41f0568c$1@news.bekkers.com.au>... > >From aus.bicycles. > > > >"I rode smack into the back of a parked bug once, not so much head down > >as mind absent." > > > Pfft; I bet there was heaps of blokes who rode Smack in the back of a parked > car in the 70s!
back of a ute wasn't it?
Nev.. '03 ZX12R
|
|
 | | From: | Conehead | | Subject: | Re: For Smack | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:28:01 +1100 |
|
|
 | Nev.. wrote in message news:41F08BD8.843C0904@mindless.com... > Knobdoodle wrote: > > > > X-No-archive: yes > > Theo Bekkers wrote in message <41f0568c$1@news.bekkers.com.au>... > > >From aus.bicycles. > > > > > >"I rode smack into the back of a parked bug once, not so much head down > > >as mind absent." > > > > > Pfft; I bet there was heaps of blokes who rode Smack in the back of a parked > > car in the 70s! > > back of a ute wasn't it? > > Nev.. > '03 ZX12R
Anywhere, anytime, anyone, anything. Goddamn promiscuous hippie!
-- Conehead "I've already lost the argument, I'm now just fighting a rear-guard action." Gerry, being more honest than most
|
|
 | | From: | G-S | | Subject: | Re: For Smack | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:59:58 +1100 |
|
|
 | "Conehead" wrote in message news:35bi8uF4fu1tgU1@individual.net... > > Nev.. wrote in message > news:41F08BD8.843C0904@mindless.com... >> Knobdoodle wrote: >> > >> > X-No-archive: yes >> > Theo Bekkers wrote in message <41f0568c$1@news.bekkers.com.au>... >> > >From aus.bicycles. >> > > >> > >"I rode smack into the back of a parked bug once, not so much head >> > >down >> > >as mind absent." >> > > >> > Pfft; I bet there was heaps of blokes who rode Smack in the back of a > parked >> > car in the 70s! >> >> back of a ute wasn't it? >> >> Nev.. >> '03 ZX12R > > Anywhere, anytime, anyone, anything. Goddamn promiscuous hippie! >
I blame the Ducati 600SS personally... it warped his mind! Going so slow and all he kept looking for something to occupy his time... and came up with promiscousness!
G-S
|
|
 | | From: | Conehead | | Subject: | Re: For Smack | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:55:19 +1100 |
|
|
 | G-S wrote in message news:10v1a631q3ds5f@news.supernews.com... > > "Conehead" wrote in message > news:35bi8uF4fu1tgU1@individual.net... > > > > Nev.. wrote in message > > news:41F08BD8.843C0904@mindless.com... > >> Knobdoodle wrote: > >> > > >> > X-No-archive: yes > >> > Theo Bekkers wrote in message <41f0568c$1@news.bekkers.com.au>... > >> > >From aus.bicycles. > >> > > > >> > >"I rode smack into the back of a parked bug once, not so much head > >> > >down > >> > >as mind absent." > >> > > > >> > Pfft; I bet there was heaps of blokes who rode Smack in the back of a > > parked > >> > car in the 70s! > >> > >> back of a ute wasn't it? > >> > >> Nev.. > >> '03 ZX12R > > > > Anywhere, anytime, anyone, anything. Goddamn promiscuous hippie! > > > > I blame the Ducati 600SS personally... it warped his mind! Going so slow > and all he kept looking for something to occupy his time... and came up with > promiscousness! > > > G-S >
promiscuity
-- Conehead Happy to help and educate obviously a generation of teachers failed to do so
|
|
 | | From: | G-S | | Subject: | Re: For Smack | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:19:02 +1100 |
|
|
 | "Conehead" wrote in message news:35c1u6F4lh053U1@individual.net... > > G-S wrote in message > news:10v1a631q3ds5f@news.supernews.com... >> >> "Conehead" wrote in message >> news:35bi8uF4fu1tgU1@individual.net... >> > >> > Nev.. wrote in message >> > news:41F08BD8.843C0904@mindless.com... >> >> Knobdoodle wrote: >> >> > >> >> > X-No-archive: yes >> >> > Theo Bekkers wrote in message <41f0568c$1@news.bekkers.com.au>... >> >> > >From aus.bicycles. >> >> > > >> >> > >"I rode smack into the back of a parked bug once, not so much head >> >> > >down >> >> > >as mind absent." >> >> > > >> >> > Pfft; I bet there was heaps of blokes who rode Smack in the back of >> >> > a >> > parked >> >> > car in the 70s! >> >> >> >> back of a ute wasn't it? >> >> >> >> Nev.. >> >> '03 ZX12R >> > >> > Anywhere, anytime, anyone, anything. Goddamn promiscuous hippie! >> > >> >> I blame the Ducati 600SS personally... it warped his mind! Going so slow >> and all he kept looking for something to occupy his time... and came up > with >> promiscousness! >> >> >> G-S >> > > promiscuity >
Oh well... so I confused an adjective with the noun... at least it's not a spelling error!
And it's an adjective with an odd ending. Traditionally the -ness ending is used to form nouns.
examples: dark to darkness, bitter to bitterness, happy to happiness, thick to thickness etc.
One of those oddities of the English language... and I must admit one I hadn't noticed :-)
G-S
|
|
 | | From: | smack | | Subject: | Re: For Smack | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:34:16 +1100 |
|
|
 | well it took the spotlight off my loose morals
"G-S" wrote in message news:10v1pb8ajnhh56e@news.supernews.com... > > "Conehead" wrote in message > news:35c1u6F4lh053U1@individual.net... > > > > G-S wrote in message > > news:10v1a631q3ds5f@news.supernews.com... > >> > >> "Conehead" wrote in message > >> news:35bi8uF4fu1tgU1@individual.net... > >> > > >> > Nev.. wrote in message > >> > news:41F08BD8.843C0904@mindless.com... > >> >> Knobdoodle wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > X-No-archive: yes > >> >> > Theo Bekkers wrote in message <41f0568c$1@news.bekkers.com.au>... > >> >> > >From aus.bicycles. > >> >> > > > >> >> > >"I rode smack into the back of a parked bug once, not so much head > >> >> > >down > >> >> > >as mind absent." > >> >> > > > >> >> > Pfft; I bet there was heaps of blokes who rode Smack in the back of > >> >> > a > >> > parked > >> >> > car in the 70s! > >> >> > >> >> back of a ute wasn't it? > >> >> > >> >> Nev.. > >> >> '03 ZX12R > >> > > >> > Anywhere, anytime, anyone, anything. Goddamn promiscuous hippie! > >> > > >> > >> I blame the Ducati 600SS personally... it warped his mind! Going so slow > >> and all he kept looking for something to occupy his time... and came up > > with > >> promiscousness! > >> > >> > >> G-S > >> > > > > promiscuity > > > > Oh well... so I confused an adjective with the noun... at least it's not a > spelling error! > > And it's an adjective with an odd ending. Traditionally the -ness ending is > used to form nouns. > > examples: dark to darkness, bitter to bitterness, happy to happiness, thick > to thickness etc. > > One of those oddities of the English language... and I must admit one I > hadn't noticed :-) > > > G-S > >
|
|
 | | From: | GB | | Subject: | Re: For Smack | | Date: | 22 Jan 2005 14:02:59 +1100 |
|
|
 | "smack" wrote in news:35cb68F4j99htU1@individual.net: > well it took the spotlight off my loose morals
Not to mention all the other bits that became loose as a result of your morals being loose.
G
|
|
 | | From: | Conehead | | Subject: | Re: For Smack | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:55:22 +1100 |
|
|
 | G-S wrote in message news:10v1pb8ajnhh56e@news.supernews.com... > > "Conehead" wrote in message > news:35c1u6F4lh053U1@individual.net... > >
> >> I blame the Ducati 600SS personally... it warped his mind! Going so slow > >> and all he kept looking for something to occupy his time... and came up > > with > >> promiscousness! > >> > >> > >> G-S > >> > > > > promiscuity > > > > Oh well... so I confused an adjective with the noun... at least it's not a > spelling error! > > And it's an adjective with an odd ending. Traditionally the -ness ending is > used to form nouns. > > examples: dark to darkness, bitter to bitterness, happy to happiness, thick > to thickness etc. > > One of those oddities of the English language... and I must admit one I > hadn't noticed :-) > > > G-S > > Just displaying my perspicuousness and ambiguousness.
-- Conehead "I've already lost the argument, I'm now just fighting a rear-guard action." Gerry, being more honest than most
|
|