 | | From: | peter | | Subject: | [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:47:31 +1100 |
|
|
 | Anyone know why the 2 "M" sets on Sector 1 are moving to Sector 2 from 7th February?
Is a infrastructure problem or just a political exercise?
peter
|
|
 | | From: | Malcolm Purvis | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:47:31 +1100 |
|
|
 | >>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Geier writes:
Matthew> run the train sets where crews are qualified to operate them....
How long does it take to qualify a crew for the M Sets?
Malcolm
-- Malcolm Purvis
Q: Why did the chicken cross the Mobius strip? A: To get to the other... uh... err...
|
|
 | | From: | Tezza | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:12:08 +1100 |
|
|
 | "Malcolm Purvis" wrote in message news:m2mzvf2d3g.fsf@silver.local... >>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Geier >>>>>> writes: > > Matthew> run the train sets where crews are qualified to operate them.... > > How long does it take to qualify a crew for the M Sets?
A week for Drivers
|
|
 | | From: | The Flying Frog | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:38:54 +1100 |
|
|
 | "peter" wrote in message news:41e37687$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au... > Anyone know why the 2 "M" sets on Sector 1 are moving to Sector 2 from 7th > February? > > Is a infrastructure problem or just a political exercise?
I'd go with the latter - all the others are running on the western lines already.
|
|
 | | From: | Albert Alcoceba | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:23:44 +1100 |
|
|
 | On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:38:54 +1100, "The Flying Frog" wrote:
>> Anyone know why the 2 "M" sets on Sector 1 are moving to Sector 2 from 7th >> February? >> >> Is a infrastructure problem or just a political exercise? > >I'd go with the latter - all the others are running on the western lines >already.
I think it's more of a case that not enough Mortdale / Waterfall drivers are qualified for them. Makes sense to keep them all in one Sector where you can concentrate on training the drivers for them.
Albert Alcoceba <>< alberta@REMOVE.ihug.com.au http://aussietrains.fotopic.net/ Remove REMOVE
|
|
 | | From: | Hunslet | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:37:40 +1100 |
|
|
 | >On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:38:54 +1100, "The Flying Frog" > wrote: > >>> Anyone know why the 2 "M" sets on Sector 1 are moving to Sector 2 from 7th >>> February? >>> >>> Is a infrastructure problem or just a political exercise? >> >>I'd go with the latter - all the others are running on the western lines >>already. > >I think it's more of a case that not enough Mortdale / Waterfall >drivers are qualified for them. Makes sense to keep them all in one >Sector where you can concentrate on training the drivers for them.
As I understand it, it was more the case that NO Illawarra based drivers and guards were qualified to work the two trains. It was necessary to bring in crews from other Sectors, oftern at considerable expense. In addition, these "foreign" crews were not qualified to work the Waterfall-Helensburgh section, so each "foreign" crew had to be piloted over this section - at additional cost.
Until such time as Illawarra crews are qualified in these sets, the decision is the correct one.
Hunslet.
|
|
 | | From: | Tezza | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:38:12 +1100 |
|
|
 | "Hunslet" wrote in message news:oce7u09v16etu47i29rokdr2rrr398nc6h@4ax.com...
> As I understand it, it was more the case that NO Illawarra based > drivers and guards were qualified to work the two trains. It was > necessary to bring in crews from other Sectors, oftern at considerable > expense. In addition, these "foreign" crews were not qualified to > work the Waterfall-Helensburgh section, so each "foreign" crew had to > be piloted over this section - at additional cost.
Even in & out of Waterfall Yard
|
|
 | | From: | Matthew Geier | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:20:11 +1100 |
|
|
 | On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:37:40 +1100, Hunslet wrote:
> >>On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:38:54 +1100, "The Flying Frog" >> wrote: >> >>>> Anyone know why the 2 "M" sets on Sector 1 are moving to Sector 2 from 7th >>>> February? >>>> >>>> Is a infrastructure problem or just a political exercise? >>>
>>I think it's more of a case that not enough Mortdale / Waterfall >>drivers are qualified for them. Makes sense to keep them all in one >>Sector where you can concentrate on training the drivers for them.
> As I understand it, it was more the case that NO Illawarra based > drivers and guards were qualified to work the two trains.
The fact that they ended up in Sector 1 when there was insufficient crews to work them was a political exercise in the first place.
The Political directive to get a few 'token' units on the Bondi Junction - Cronulla/Waterfall run has probably 'expired' and now a small about of sensible rostering about to happen - run the train sets where crews are qualified to operate them....
|
|
 | | From: | peter | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:08:21 +1100 |
|
|
 | "Hunslet" wrote in message news:oce7u09v16etu47i29rokdr2rrr398nc6h@4ax.com... > >>On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:38:54 +1100, "The Flying Frog" >> wrote: >> >>>> Anyone know why the 2 "M" sets on Sector 1 are moving to Sector 2 from >>>> 7th >>>> February? >>>> >>>> Is a infrastructure problem or just a political exercise? >>> >>>I'd go with the latter - all the others are running on the western lines >>>already. >> >>I think it's more of a case that not enough Mortdale / Waterfall >>drivers are qualified for them. Makes sense to keep them all in one >>Sector where you can concentrate on training the drivers for them. > > > As I understand it, it was more the case that NO Illawarra based > drivers and guards were qualified to work the two trains. It was > necessary to bring in crews from other Sectors, oftern at considerable > expense. In addition, these "foreign" crews were not qualified to > work the Waterfall-Helensburgh section, so each "foreign" crew had to > be piloted over this section - at additional cost. > > Until such time as Illawarra crews are qualified in these sets, the > decision is the correct one. > > Hunslet.
Thanks for that. I knew that crews from Campbelltown had to travel to Waterfall by taxi to commence the service that started from their each morning.
peter
|
|
 | | From: | Hunslet | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:27:44 +1100 |
|
|
 | On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:08:21 +1100, "peter" wrote:
> >Thanks for that. I knew that crews from Campbelltown had to travel to >Waterfall >by taxi to commence the service that started from their each morning.
Not quite. I think that you will find that the driver came from Campbelltown, but the guard came frm Blacktown - officially by train.
Hunslet
|
|
 | | From: | Tezza | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:17:43 +1100 |
|
|
 | "Hunslet" wrote in message news:o5o8u01qjof9v52de7ng8kpn579lpgg50d@4ax.com... > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:08:21 +1100, "peter" wrote: > > >> >>Thanks for that. I knew that crews from Campbelltown had to travel to >>Waterfall >>by taxi to commence the service that started from their each morning. > > > Not quite. I think that you will find that the driver came from > Campbelltown, but the guard came frm Blacktown - officially by train.
There are/were jobs rostered to go by taxi to prep and by taxi after stabling.
|
|
 | | From: | SIN CITY | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:29:21 +1100 |
|
|
 | why dont they buy some cars and have drivers for them to shuttle drivers around at a cheaper expense rather than outsource the work yet again...
"Tezza" wrote in message news:41e47ab8$1@duster.adelaide.on.net... > > "Hunslet" wrote in message > news:o5o8u01qjof9v52de7ng8kpn579lpgg50d@4ax.com... >> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:08:21 +1100, "peter" wrote: >> >> >>> >>>Thanks for that. I knew that crews from Campbelltown had to travel to >>>Waterfall >>>by taxi to commence the service that started from their each morning. >> >> >> Not quite. I think that you will find that the driver came from >> Campbelltown, but the guard came frm Blacktown - officially by train. > > There are/were jobs rostered to go by taxi to prep and by taxi after > stabling. >
|
|
 | | From: | Tsunami | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:04:23 +1100 |
|
|
 | mmmm I wouldn't mind doing that sorta job....shuttle drivers around at $20per hour..even at $12.50 per hr which is the average would be acceptable. Would have to be cheaper than $20 per couple of km.
"SIN CITY" wrote in message news:41ea09bf$0$25421$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > why dont they buy some cars and have drivers for them to shuttle drivers > around at a cheaper expense rather than outsource the work yet again... > > > "Tezza" wrote in message > news:41e47ab8$1@duster.adelaide.on.net... >> >> "Hunslet" wrote in message >> news:o5o8u01qjof9v52de7ng8kpn579lpgg50d@4ax.com... >>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:08:21 +1100, "peter" wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>>Thanks for that. I knew that crews from Campbelltown had to travel to >>>>Waterfall >>>>by taxi to commence the service that started from their each morning. >>> >>> >>> Not quite. I think that you will find that the driver came from >>> Campbelltown, but the guard came frm Blacktown - officially by train. >> >> There are/were jobs rostered to go by taxi to prep and by taxi after >> stabling. >> > >
|
|
 | | From: | Hunslet | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:45:13 +1100 |
|
|
 | On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:04:23 +1100, "Tsunami" gocconline dot com> wrote:
>mmmm I wouldn't mind doing that sorta job....shuttle drivers around at >$20per hour..even at $12.50 per hr which is the average would be acceptable. >Would have to be cheaper than $20 per couple of km.
Firstly, where do you live? That hourly rate has to also pay all costs for the acquisition and operation of your motor vehicle, all insurances including public liability, on call, etc.. Excluding "dead mileage" to the pick-up and after the set down ... Waiting around .... No thanks!
Hunslet.
|
|
 | | From: | Tezza | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:08:44 +1100 |
|
|
 | "SIN CITY" wrote in message news:41ea09bf$0$25421$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > why dont they buy some cars and have drivers for them to shuttle drivers > around at a cheaper expense rather than outsource the work yet again...
With 3 drivers needed just for 1 car, sick pay, holiday pay, long service, etc.
> "Tezza" wrote in message >> "Hunslet" wrote in message >>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:08:21 +1100, "peter" wrote: >>>> >>>>Thanks for that. I knew that crews from Campbelltown had to travel to >>>>Waterfall by taxi to commence the service that started from their each >>>>morning. >>> >>> Not quite. I think that you will find that the driver came from >>> Campbelltown, but the guard came frm Blacktown - officially by train. >> >> There are/were jobs rostered to go by taxi to prep and by taxi after >> stabling.
|
|
 | | From: | Tezza | | Subject: | Re: [NSW] M sets | | Date: | Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:16:04 +1100 |
|
|
 | "peter" wrote in message news:41e44e5b$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> Thanks for that. I knew that crews from Campbelltown had to travel to > Waterfall by taxi to commence the service that started from their each > morning.
And to put it to bed
|
|