|
|
 | | From: | fbonsignore at beethoven.com | | Subject: | Hypothesis there must be 64 m-RNAs | | Date: | 19 Jan 2005 09:12:23 -0800 |
|
|
 | There are 63 "varieties", but logic indicates there must be 64, 16
binding to each DNA base. Considering that DNA is a language base 4, it
makes sense to have all 64 as that allows an integrated formal language
approach to DNA sequencing and the ultimate formal translation into
protein structures (which in turn can be transformed into an
architectural model for biological structures). The missing RNA should
be found or its nonexistence explained.
|
|
| | From: | Colin North | | Subject: | Re: Hypothesis there must be 64 m-RNAs | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:30:41 -0500 |
|
|
| I think you need to clarify what you mean by 64 varieties of mRNA. As
far as I know mRNA is basically one form: mRNA. The sequence can vary,
but in the end it is simply what it is. Perhaps you're referring to mRNA
translation, where mRNA triplets are paired with complementary tRNA, and
from this sequence a polypeptide is polymerized?
"Logic indicates that must be 64..."
I disagree. Mathematics makes it POSSIBLE that there could be 64 of
something in a "base 4 language", but possibility does not necessarily
dictate reality.
CMN
fbonsignore@beethoven.com wrote:
> There are 63 "varieties", but logic indicates there must be 64, 16
> binding to each DNA base. Considering that DNA is a language base 4, it
> makes sense to have all 64 as that allows an integrated formal language
> approach to DNA sequencing and the ultimate formal translation into
> protein structures (which in turn can be transformed into an
> architectural model for biological structures). The missing RNA should
> be found or its nonexistence explained.
>
|
|
|
