|
|
 | | From: | Mike Powell | | Subject: | Re: Did animals have early quake warning? | | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:53:24 +0000 |
|
|
 |
I have always suspected that domesticated animals, which have become dependant
on other animals (humans), do not have the keen senses that the wild animals
would. That, and they might be more afraid of leaving their humans than
they are of whatever is coming.
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:58:07 +0000, you wrote:
>As Ric pointed out, news reports about thousands of dead animals
>littering the streets are now beginning to appear.
>
>These would be domesticated animals, such as cats, dogs, cows, etc.
>that would normally be present in the towns.
>As I mentioned previously, wild animals would normally be far away
>from the towns and human population centres. The towns were built in
>areas where the forests and mangrove swamps had been cleared. So the
>wave had a clear run through to destroy the townships.
>The wildlife in the remaining forested areas would have been protected
>as the trees broke the force of the wave, as would all the wildlife
>that was away from the cleared areas around the townships.
---
* SLMR 2.1a * "Mmmmmmmm.....chocolate."
Route: 10/22tu1 92/4
..ORIGIN: 010/022 - Kentucky's Capitol City Online * 502/875-8938 * USR v34+
|
|
|
