|
|
 | | From: | Lester Stiefel | | Subject: | Re: Which version is the Bible? | | Date: | Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:43:51 GMT |
|
|
 | tenebris wrote:
> "Steve Goltra" wrote in message
> news:aTtdd.2216$%h1.1224@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
>>Post #13 (Continued)
>>History of the King James- Continued
>>
>>
>>WHAT ABOUT ALL THE CHANGES IN THE KING JAMES BIBLE?
>>
>
>
> Of course changes in spelling, print, &c. are to be expected,
> as the language develops. What I didn't see you mention
> (perhaps I missed it), was that the original KJV contained what
> are commonly called "the Apocrypha" and were not taken out
> until sometime after 1648, due to a declaration in the
> "Westminster Confession".
>
>
Glad 2 answer that. The Apocrypha wasn't an original
inclusion in the KJV. It was added on the request of the RC
church. The Apocrypha was (&still is) an attempt to put the
RC doctrine into biblical format, so it would survive the
persecution that was back in the dark ages. Make no mistake
that the RC doctrine is plenty full of error though.
--
Lester Stiefel
In Romans 1 there are qualities of Unregenerate man listed
which describe him in the last days.
Is your quality found on this list??
|
|
|
