 | | From: | Damien | | Subject: | Re: MAKE MONEY USING PAYPAL | | Date: | 18 Jan 2005 05:07:40 -0800 |
|
|
 | You have to ask yourself who the first six addresses belonged to on the
"original" mailing - and why you never see a mailing from someone just
starting - it always seems to be from someone who's already been
succesful. Mighty strange...
|
|
| | From: | Richard Schultz | | Subject: | Re: MAKE MONEY USING PAYPAL | | Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:24:01 +0000 (UTC) |
|
|
| In rec.music.classical.recordings Damien wrote:
: You have to ask yourself who the first six addresses belonged to on the
: "original" mailing - and why you never see a mailing from someone just
: starting - it always seems to be from someone who's already been
: succesful. Mighty strange...
I believe it was Dogbert who pointed out that you have to wonder about
the intelligence of someone who does something illegal and then signs
his name and address to it.
-----
Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"an optimist is a guy/ that has never had/ much experience"
|
|
| | From: | Jeff | | Subject: | Re: MAKE MONEY USING PAYPAL | | Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:55:16 -0800 |
|
|
| On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:24:01 +0000, Richard Schultz wrote:
> I believe it was Dogbert who pointed out that you have to wonder about
> the intelligence of someone who does something illegal and then signs
> his name and address to it.
Do you mean that guy who held up a bank with a note written on the back of
a piece of his mail (and was subsequently picked up at home with the money
a few hours later) didn't make an *honest* mistake?
-Jeff
|
|
| | From: | L David Matheny | | Subject: | Re: MAKE MONEY USING PAYPAL | | Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:43:27 -0500 |
|
|
| "Damien" wrote in message news:1106053660.051940.294700@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> You have to ask yourself who the first six addresses belonged to on the
> "original" mailing - and why you never see a mailing from someone just
> starting - it always seems to be from someone who's already been
> succesful. Mighty strange...
>
Gee, do you suppose they just fudge their own addresses in at the top
rather than waiting their turns? Nah, that would be dishonest, and we
can surely trust these guys, can't we?
|
|
