Hello,

Can anyone tell me how to use a send-hook to ad a file to every outgoing
mail, no mather what e-mail adress i use....

Thanks.

Mike
--

| Mike van Vugt | Unix-Mike@home.nl |
| Databoss Corporation BV - www.databoss.nl |
| kernel-2.6.2.3mdk-1-1mdk | Mandrake Linux release 10.0 |

From:	Sven Guckes
Subject:	Re: Send-Hook
Date:	13 Dec 2004 20:53:03 GMT

* Mike on Unix [2004-12-13]:
> Can anyone tell me how to use a send-hook to ad a file to
> every outgoing mail, no mather what e-mail adress i use...

are you talking about a "signature"?
or about an automated attachment?
what is the actual problem you
are trying to solve, anyway?

Sven

From:	inkedmn at gmail.com
Subject:	Re: Send-Hook
Date:	13 Dec 2004 12:57:14 -0800

I'd think it'd be something like:

send-hook . "~/foo.txt"
but i can't seem to get that to work, hmm...

From:	Sven Guckes
Subject:	Re: Send-Hook
Date:	14 Dec 2004 01:39:32 GMT

* inkedmn@gmail.com [2004-12-13]:
> I'd think it'd be something like:
> send-hook . "~/foo.txt"
> but i can't seem to get that to work, hmm...

just "push" it..

Sven

From:	Mike on Unix
Subject:	Re: Send-Hook
Date:	Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:19:15 +0000 (UTC)

On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 01:39:32AM +0000, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * inkedmn@gmail.com [2004-12-13]:
> > I'd think it'd be something like:
> > send-hook . "~/foo.txt"
> > but i can't seem to get that to work, hmm...
>
> just "push" it..
>
> Sven

Sven,

Can you explain the "push" ???

Regards,

Mike

--

| Mike van Vugt | Unix-Mike@home.nl |
| Databoss Corporation BV - www.databoss.nl |
| kernel-2.6.2.3mdk-1-1mdk | Mandrake Linux release 10.0 |

This weeks excuse: electromagnetic radiation from satellite debris

From:	Christopher Nehren
Subject:	Re: Send-Hook
Date:	14 Dec 2004 18:33:28 GMT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2004-12-14, Mike on Unix scribbled these
curious markings:
> Can you explain the "push" ???

It's in the Mutt User Manual (not the official name, but it's one that
I've decided to give the bigger document available at
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/ to differentiate it from mutt(1)).

Best Regards,
Christopher Nehren
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBvzH4k/lo7zvzJioRAnjwAJ98SYbQ1xS87x6l+27ke5DxK3MRkACeIh+X
fQHijZsTyi0HFbLe3KMrGik=
=Tjj/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded
pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson
If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God".
Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly.

From:	Ben Shimmin
Subject:	Re: Send-Hook
Date:	Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:42:17 +0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christopher Nehren :
> It's in the Mutt User Manual (not the official name, but it's one that
> I've decided to give the bigger document available at
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/ to differentiate it from mutt(1)).

How magnanimous of you, but why the need for differentiation? One is
`the Mutt manual', the other is `the Mutt man page'. Or am I missing
something?

b.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBvzQPAqQNOmQGWekRArVmAJ448bjGvRnMxBGLRYOEYhe0yhY08gCfZyHL
DzHqj7RO1ymwJZFmWGgHISg=
=V15k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From:	Peter H. Coffin
Subject:	Re: Send-Hook
Date:	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:05:21 -0600

On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:42:17 +0000, Ben Shimmin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Christopher Nehren :
>> It's in the Mutt User Manual (not the official name, but it's one that
>> I've decided to give the bigger document available at
>> http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/ to differentiate it from mutt(1)).
>
> How magnanimous of you, but why the need for differentiation? One is
> `the Mutt manual', the other is `the Mutt man page'. Or am I missing
> something?
>
> b.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFBvzQPAqQNOmQGWekRArVmAJ448bjGvRnMxBGLRYOEYhe0yhY08gCfZyHL
> DzHqj7RO1ymwJZFmWGgHISg=
> =V15k
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

It's a manual page, innit? Can't be all l337 and stuff if you don't even
know the history of what you think you know.

--
Pieces of seven! Pieces of seven! (Hrm, parroty error)

From:	Ben Shimmin
Subject:	Re: Send-Hook
Date:	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:41:15 +0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter H. Coffin :
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:42:17 +0000, Ben Shimmin wrote:
>> Christopher Nehren :
>>> It's in the Mutt User Manual (not the official name, but it's one that
>>> I've decided to give the bigger document available at
>>> http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/ to differentiate it from mutt(1)).
>>
>> How magnanimous of you, but why the need for differentiation? One is
>> `the Mutt manual', the other is `the Mutt man page'. Or am I missing
>> something?
>
> It's a manual page, innit? Can't be all l337 and stuff if you don't even
> know the history of what you think you know.

Q. Why do women find unix so difficult to use?
A. They'd never think to ask a man for help.

Sorry, I'll get my coat.

b.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBwGkyAqQNOmQGWekRAgecAJ0dALtxswPToxBZ2fAFQIhIbbPEkACfWVwB
BwyA7EIzWUkg860pbjPV6yA=
=78lT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From:	Christopher Nehren
Subject:	Re: Send-Hook
Date:	15 Dec 2004 16:58:50 GMT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2004-12-15, Peter H. Coffin scribbled these
curious markings:
> It's a manual page, innit? Can't be all l337 and stuff if you don't even
> know the history of what you think you know.

Really? I never knew that!

Thank you for proving *exactly* why I see that there's a need to
differentiate -- people like you *further* confusing the matter by
calling mutt(1) the *manual*. By the way, I hope that you like having
Alan Connor for company. :)

Christopher Nehren
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBwG1Kk/lo7zvzJioRAqthAKCCAo1wwTmd6y+1dfJe7RxOFMaXhACgnoYn
xH23rMPhV6ZWkfe/Juynfyk=
=pVRb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded
pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson
If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God".
Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly.

From:	Peter H. Coffin
Subject:	Re: Send-Hook
Date:	Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:30:34 -0600

On 15 Dec 2004 16:58:50 GMT, Christopher Nehren wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2004-12-15, Peter H. Coffin scribbled these
> curious markings:
>> It's a manual page, innit? Can't be all l337 and stuff if you don't even
>> know the history of what you think you know.
>
> Really? I never knew that!
>
>
> Thank you for proving *exactly* why I see that there's a need to
> differentiate -- people like you *further* confusing the matter by
> calling mutt(1) the *manual*. By the way, I hope that you like having
> Alan Connor for company. :)
>
> Christopher Nehren
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
>
> iD8DBQFBwG1Kk/lo7zvzJioRAqthAKCCAo1wwTmd6y+1dfJe7RxOFMaXhACgnoYn
> xH23rMPhV6ZWkfe/Juynfyk=
> =pVRb
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"It's terrible that people confuse these things!"
"It's entirely reasonable that people confuse these things because the
useage has changed."
"It's your fault that people confuse these things!"

Either you're having difficulty understanding what I'm saying, or you're
intentionally being a prick. I suspect the latter. If it's the former,
please say so, and I'll start caring again.

--
With a Dremel tool and a cut-off wheel, _everything_ takes a flat-blade
screwdriver.
-- Matt Roberds in the Monastery

From:	Sven Guckes
Subject:	Re: basic documentation
Date:	15 Dec 2004 20:25:00 GMT

* Christopher Nehren [2004-12-15]:
> people .. *further* confusing the matter
> by calling mutt(1) the *manual*.

man mutt
man muttrc
zless /usr/share/doc/manual.txt.gz
links wiki.mutt.org

what more does one need to know?

Sven

From:	David Combs
Subject:	Re: basic documentation
Date:	Sat, 1 Jan 2005 00:27:17 +0000 (UTC)

In article <2004-12-15T20-22-37@guckes.net>,
Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> links wiki.mutt.org
>

How long has *that* been around?

(First I've heard of it.
But is really nice to know that it exists!)

David

From:	Alan Connor
Subject:	Re: basic documentation
Date:	Sat, 01 Jan 2005 00:52:20 GMT

On Sat, 1 Jan 2005 00:27:17 +0000 (UTC), David Combs
wrote:

> In article <2004-12-15T20-22-37@guckes.net>, Sven Guckes
> wrote:
>
>> links wiki.mutt.org
>
>
> How long has *that* been around?
>
> (First I've heard of it. But is really nice to know that it
> exists!)
>
> David
>
>

http://wiki.mutt.org

(because some people may not know that links
is a browser)

Now all I need is a wiki tutorial. Never used one.

AC

From:	Christopher Nehren
Subject:	Re: Send-Hook
Date:	14 Dec 2004 19:43:03 GMT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2004-12-14, Ben Shimmin scribbled these
curious markings:
> How magnanimous of you, but why the need for differentiation? One is
> `the Mutt manual', the other is `the Mutt man page'. Or am I missing
> something?

Some people confuse 'the Mutt manual' with mutt(1). I know there's a
difference, you know there's a difference, others know there's a
difference. But the kind of person who asks about 'push' probably
doesn't.

Best Regards,
Christopher Nehren
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBv0JHk/lo7zvzJioRAlsKAJ9zuvmlmWlds/U77c9232LPHZ0n2gCfWsLY
yA3lkTiFUaYf6w9Q/FrjzS0=
=hmFH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded
pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson
If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God".
Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly.