 | | From: | pererasanjaya at gmail.com | | Subject: | HyperC | | Date: | 19 Jan 2005 19:08:57 -0800 |
|
|
 | I downloaded a copy of HyperC. It contains two disks. I want to copy
them to my existing 32MB disk. If i just copy the files into two
subdirectories, will it work. In that case how to start HyperC?
Or is AztecC a better option in my case?
thanks,
sanjaya
|
|
| | From: | Michael Wilkinson | | Subject: | Re: HyperC | | Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2005 04:25:28 +0000 (UTC) |
|
|
| In article <1106190537.561283.294040@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, pererasanjaya@gmail.com wrote:
> I downloaded a copy of HyperC. It contains two disks. I want to copy
> them to my existing 32MB disk. If i just copy the files into two
> subdirectories, will it work. In that case how to start HyperC?
> Or is AztecC a better option in my case?
>
I did the same.
I had to edit the paths in the scripts which were in the bin directory.
Seemed to have done the trick.
-Mike
--
Michael Wilkinson
Game Designer
Tower Ravens LLC
|
|
| | From: | Terry Olsen | | Subject: | Re: HyperC | | Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:56:58 -0700 |
|
|
| I'd like to know this also. From those with experience, which is better?
HyperC or AztecC? And why?
wrote in message
news:1106190537.561283.294040@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>I downloaded a copy of HyperC. It contains two disks. I want to copy
> them to my existing 32MB disk. If i just copy the files into two
> subdirectories, will it work. In that case how to start HyperC?
> Or is AztecC a better option in my case?
>
> thanks,
> sanjaya
>
|
|
| | From: | aiiadict at gmail.com | | Subject: | Re: HyperC | | Date: | 19 Jan 2005 20:09:49 -0800 |
|
|
| skip HyperC and Aztec and use
cc65.
http://www.cc65.org/
Rich
|
|
