|
|
 | | From: | Andy | | Subject: | Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | Sun, 9 Jan 2005 02:06:49 -0000 |
|
|
 | First off I just want to clear this up that I am not spamming or advertising or endorsing a product, honestly or anything but am letting people know about this product I heard about last year but there seems so little advertising I am not sure people even know it exists and is physically on the market to buy but imagine when you are speaking to your family or friends over the telephone have you ever wondered how great to would be to physically see your loved ones as well as talk to them on your home television! and as easy as plugging it in and pressing a button during a normal phone call!
The device I discovered on the Internet is called Beamer TV. Imagine having one unit here in Ireland and the other unit in the UK (or any other country that uses PAL type TV signal and 230v AC) and during your phone call if both of you want to see a picture of each other all you had to do is both press one button on your unit and within 60 seconds a colour picture came up on your TV (portable or widescreen) and all this done with a normal telephone line, with standard telephone call rates, no subscriptions and no PC involved whatsoever - how cool does that sound. It sounds futuristic but the fact of the matter is that these units are on sale from a UK distributor available now to buy (well in fact I was enquiring last summer about them they were on sale then). The price isn't too bad as well really they cost 149.50 UK Pounds Each - that works out to around 214.00 EURO (but you will need 2 units to make it work) you imagine you could buy one and your family/relations/friend in the UK could pay for the other unit or if you are feeling generous you could buy the 2 units and ship the other one over to them.
I was assured by the UK Distributor when I asked last year that the units will work in Ireland with a UK to Ireland Telephone adapter and that if the Telephone Call Quality is very clear (which it is normally when phoning from Ireland to the UK) then the picture should be very clear.
Now, my predicament is this. I am quite excited about this idea and these units but I am wondering about picture quality and how stable these units are and how they really do perform on calls from Ireland to the UK but the company (although ensuring me that they will work fine) will not sell on a sale or return basis (understandably) and I am not in a (financial) position to buy one of these units at the moment let alone 2 of them plus her indoors is skeptical and cannot see the point in them so I cannot win her over on getting one. So, is there anyone reading this who has a bit of money to spare, and take a gamble and buy 2 of these units (one for them and one for their mate/family in the UK) and try them out physically and then post their comments on the product up on here? - sounds cheeky I know but if you are into gadgets and can suffer a gamble on the price of these units I for one would be very intrigued on how good these units are as would a lot of people would be I reckon. All it takes is someone to make that initial first purchase and see if they are as good as the manufacturers/distributors say.
If you fancy being a 'guinea pig' and want the website address of the distributor of the Beamer TV units in the UK their address is: http://www.qtsltd.co.uk/ the website for the manufacturers is: http://www.vialta.com/beamertv.htm (ignore the references to NTSC because that is on the American Models) and also I have sort of done a webpage with a picture of the unit (which sits on top of your television) and have included a downloadable Instructions of the unit in pdf format for people who are interested to see how it all connects up etc.. my website address is: http://www.beamertv.utvinternet.com
It would be great if someone did take the plunge and physically buy a couple of these units and tried them out and posted their comments or produced some kind of review on them on their personal website or posted the comment up on here. Of course you don't have to use one in the UK and one in Ireland you could use them both in Ireland if you wanted to. You could have one stationed at your home in Sligo and the other one Stationed at your friends house in County Cork and see each other should still work all the same. -
Thanks for taking the time reading this email and if you do decide to go for these units the very best of luck to ye,
Andy. - Who does not work for any of these companies but is really excited about these little gadgets :-) and would seriously consider selling/marketing/distributing them in Ireland if had the money to do so :-)
|
|
 | | From: | Howard9 | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:45:29 -0000 |
|
|
 | In article <34bhofF49764bU1@individual.net>, andy@gofree.ie says... > within 60 seconds a colour picture came up on > your TV (portable or widescreen) and all this done with a normal telephone > line, with standard telephone call rates, no subscriptions and no PC > involved whatsoever >
Firstly that would most definitely require a DSL enabled line. Secondly ..... 60 SECONDS ???? You must be pulling our legs !!!
-- Howard
|
|
 | | From: | Brian Boyle | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | 11 Jan 2005 14:05:03 GMT |
|
|
 | On 2005-01-11, Howard9 wrote: > In article <34bhofF49764bU1@individual.net>, andy@gofree.ie says... >> within 60 seconds a colour picture came up on >> your TV (portable or widescreen) and all this done with a normal telephone >> line, with standard telephone call rates, no subscriptions and no PC >> involved whatsoever > > Firstly that would most definitely require a DSL enabled line. Secondly > .... 60 SECONDS ???? You must be pulling our legs !!!
It's perfectly feasable, but as you suggest, this is not going to be anywhere near TV quality. It looks like it uses a buitlin 33.6K modem to send the data over, so the quality of the image and the frequency of updates will be low.
Brian.
|
|
 | | From: | Andy | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:30:33 -0000 |
|
|
 | "Brian Boyle" wrote in message news:41e3dd0f$0$712$ba620d2c@reader.news.heanet.ie... > On 2005-01-11, Howard9 wrote: > > In article <34bhofF49764bU1@individual.net>, andy@gofree.ie says... > >> within 60 seconds a colour picture came up on > >> your TV (portable or widescreen) and all this done with a normal telephone > >> line, with standard telephone call rates, no subscriptions and no PC > >> involved whatsoever > > > > Firstly that would most definitely require a DSL enabled line. Secondly > > .... 60 SECONDS ???? You must be pulling our legs !!! > > It's perfectly feasable, but as you suggest, this is not going to be > anywhere near TV quality. It looks like it uses a buitlin 33.6K modem to > send the data over, so the quality of the image and the frequency of > updates will be low. > > Brian.
Mind you, when you hook up using a webcam and a PC with a 56k modem you are not really connecting at 56k are ye?
|
|
 | | From: | Brian Boyle | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | 11 Jan 2005 15:56:45 GMT |
|
|
 | On 2005-01-11, Andy wrote: > Mind you, when you hook up using a webcam and a PC with a 56k modem you are > not really connecting at 56k are ye?
Well, you get to use whatever your phone line and modem can achieve - minus some bandwidith for protocol encapsulation. If you achieve a 44 Kps connection, then you need to subtract percentages for overhead of IP packets, then whatever transmission protocol your webcam, uses (say UDP), then subtract some more for the application protocol (say H.323). Keep in mind that Beemer TV will need some similar overheads so it can combine voice and video, and you probably still come out with a marginally better quality with a reasonable set of webcams and regular internet connections, but you'd have to experiment with both to get a definite answer. In either case, I strongly suspect that the quality of the video stream you get will be poor.
Brian.
|
|
 | | From: | John | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:09:27 +0000 |
|
|
 | On 11 Jan 2005 15:56:45 GMT, Brian Boyle wrote:
>Well, you get to use whatever your phone line and modem can achieve - >minus some bandwidith for protocol encapsulation. If you achieve a 44 >Kps connection, then you need to subtract percentages for overhead of >IP packets, then whatever transmission protocol your webcam, uses (say UDP), >then subtract some more for the application protocol (say H.323). Keep >in mind that Beemer TV will need some similar overheads so it can combine >voice and video, and you probably still come out with a marginally better >quality with a reasonable set of webcams and regular internet connections, >but you'd have to experiment with both to get a definite answer. In >either case, I strongly suspect that the quality of the video stream you >get will be poor.
I did a quick Google and there are reviews saying the picture quality is quite poor. The camera resolution isn't great to begin with, but I suppose that doesn't really matter considering the image is being sent down a phone line.
Not to mention it being way overpriced for what it is.
|
|
 | | From: | Andy | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:35:30 -0000 |
|
|
 | "Howard9" wrote in message news:1105451130.eba69ea7de52ba43f3ef464f1b2b7fd1@teranews... > In article <34bhofF49764bU1@individual.net>, andy@gofree.ie says... > > within 60 seconds a colour picture came up on > > your TV (portable or widescreen) and all this done with a normal telephone > > line, with standard telephone call rates, no subscriptions and no PC > > involved whatsoever > > > > Firstly that would most definitely require a DSL enabled line. Secondly > .... 60 SECONDS ???? You must be pulling our legs !!!
> Howard
According to instructions for it, it uses any normal telephone line and video comes up within 15-60 seconds : http://www.beamertv.utvinternet.com/BeamerTVUserGuide.pdf
|
|
 | | From: | Brian | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | Sun, 9 Jan 2005 03:51:26 -0000 |
|
|
 | "Andy" wrote in message news:34bhofF49764bU1@individual.net... > First off I just want to clear this up that I am not spamming or > advertising > or endorsing a product, honestly or anything but am letting people know > about this product I heard about last year but there seems so little > advertising I am not sure people even know it exists and is physically on > the market to buy but imagine when you are speaking to your family or > friends over the telephone have you ever wondered how great to would be to > physically see your loved ones as well as talk to them on your home > television! and as easy as plugging it in and pressing a button during a > normal phone call! >
Ever hear of a webcam and a headset?
|
|
 | | From: | Brian | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | Sun, 9 Jan 2005 03:53:19 -0000 |
|
|
 | "Brian" wrote in message news:3T1Ed.45270$Z14.23795@news.indigo.ie... > > "Andy" wrote in message > news:34bhofF49764bU1@individual.net... >> First off I just want to clear this up that I am not spamming or >> advertising >> or endorsing a product, honestly or anything but am letting people know >> about this product I heard about last year but there seems so little >> advertising I am not sure people even know it exists and is physically on >> the market to buy but imagine when you are speaking to your family or >> friends over the telephone have you ever wondered how great to would be >> to >> physically see your loved ones as well as talk to them on your home >> television! and as easy as plugging it in and pressing a button during a >> normal phone call! >> > > Ever hear of a webcam and a headset? > And there is also the advent of 3G which Vodafone have rolled out in most of the major cities in Ireland. We all got 6630's in our office and the video calls were great craic on NYE...
|
|
 | | From: | Andy | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:20:45 -0000 |
|
|
 | > Ever hear of a webcam and a headset?
Yep, as anticipated I knew someone would mention using a webcam instead. Granted they do have a place when you want to see someone as you are talking to them but in my experience in the past I have not been impressed myself with webcams.
They are fiddly to setup, the cheap webcams on the market have poor video quality with low resolution and focusing and they don't seem very good with a normal 56k dial up modem, on broadband maybe its better. You have to make sure you and the person you want to see are both on the PC at the same time and have the same software. You get delays, choppy video & sound especially at times you would have a lot of traffic on the Internet and echo's with the sound even when using an headset.
Couple all that up with that to use a webcam you need a PC in the first place (there are still some people out there without them you know and don't have a desire to get one) and you need someone at each end with enough technical savvy to get both webcams at each end working correctly to establish a connection.
With this Beamer TV unit what could be more simpler. You plug the telephone line into the beamer then you plug the telephone into the Beamer unit and the video lead into your television or video recorder (yes you can actually record down the pictures as well!!) either by scart socket or video in socket and then power up the unit and leave it all connected. When you are next in touch with your friend/family and you want to see eachother then a simple press of a button and within 60 seconds a picture should appear on the TV of the person you are talking too. Much easier to use than a webcam and all this without using a PC too!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------
"Brian" wrote in message news:3T1Ed.45270$Z14.23795@news.indigo.ie... > > "Andy" wrote in message > news:34bhofF49764bU1@individual.net... > > First off I just want to clear this up that I am not spamming or > > advertising > > or endorsing a product, honestly or anything but am letting people know > > about this product I heard about last year but there seems so little > > advertising I am not sure people even know it exists and is physically on > > the market to buy but imagine when you are speaking to your family or > > friends over the telephone have you ever wondered how great to would be to > > physically see your loved ones as well as talk to them on your home > > television! and as easy as plugging it in and pressing a button during a > > normal phone call! > > > > Ever hear of a webcam and a headset? > > >
|
|
 | | From: | Brian Boyle | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | 11 Jan 2005 10:24:08 GMT |
|
|
 | On 2005-01-09, Andy wrote: > Yep, as anticipated I knew someone would mention using a webcam instead. > Granted they do have a place when you want to see someone as you are talking > to them but in my experience in the past I have not been impressed myself > with webcams.
The quality of the webcam does make a huge difference, and as usual, the more expensive ones tend to perform better. For the price of the Beemer TV thing though, you could get a very good webcam.
> They are fiddly to setup, the cheap webcams on the market have poor video > quality with low resolution and focusing and they don't seem very good with > a normal 56k dial up modem, on broadband maybe its better. You have to make > sure you and the person you want to see are both on the PC at the same time > and have the same software.
Well, there are some reasonable standards for IP video conferencing these days (H.323), so its getting a lot easier to find interoperating webcams and software (or indeed, you could use the less than standards compliant but still really useful Skype). With a normal phone line, the quality of the video will defintely be quite poor, but this is a feature of the amount of data you can stuff down the phone line per second - I think the TV Beemer product is not going to outperform webcams in any signifcant way. Indeed, the specs indicate that it runs at 33.6Kps, so the overall throughput is slightly lower than you might get with a webcam/modem setup.
> You get delays, choppy video & sound especially at times you would > have a lot of traffic on the Internet and echo's with the sound > even when using an headset.
I'm willing to bet your last experience was a few years ago - while choppy video and sound are still a feature of congested connections, if both parties are using decent ISPs, then Internet congestion should not be a problem, providing you dont try to make a call using more bandwidth than your modems/connection throughput can handle.
> Couple all that up with that to use a webcam you need a PC in the first > place (there are still some people out there without them you know and don't > have a desire to get one) and you need someone at each end with enough > technical savvy to get both webcams at each end working correctly to > establish a connection.
I think you've got the precise market the Beemer TV product could reach - people who dont have, and dont want a PC. Unfortunately, at EUR 428.00 for a working pair of devices, I think you may be looking for volunteers in the wrong forum - Usenet. Its a lot of money by anyones standards, given the functionality, and lets face it, most people in ie.general have access to a PC (anyone out there with a teletype?).
Brian.
|
|
 | | From: | Andy | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:03:22 -0000 |
|
|
 | "Brian Boyle" wrote in message news:41e3a948$0$714$ba620d2c@reader.news.heanet.ie... > On 2005-01-09, Andy wrote: > > Yep, as anticipated I knew someone would mention using a webcam instead. > > Granted they do have a place when you want to see someone as you are talking > > to them but in my experience in the past I have not been impressed myself > > with webcams. > > The quality of the webcam does make a huge difference, and as usual, the > more expensive ones tend to perform better. For the price of the Beemer > TV thing though, you could get a very good webcam. > > > They are fiddly to setup, the cheap webcams on the market have poor video > > quality with low resolution and focusing and they don't seem very good with > > a normal 56k dial up modem, on broadband maybe its better. You have to make > > sure you and the person you want to see are both on the PC at the same time > > and have the same software. > > Well, there are some reasonable standards for IP video conferencing > these days (H.323), so its getting a lot easier to find interoperating > webcams and software (or indeed, you could use the less than standards > compliant but still really useful Skype). With a normal phone line, the > quality of the video will defintely be quite poor, but this is a feature > of the amount of data you can stuff down the phone line per second - > I think the TV Beemer product is not going to outperform webcams in any > signifcant way. Indeed, the specs indicate that it runs at 33.6Kps, > so the overall throughput is slightly lower than you might get with a > webcam/modem setup.
Yes, its a shame they didn't make the units with a 56k Chip in them.
> > > You get delays, choppy video & sound especially at times you would > > have a lot of traffic on the Internet and echo's with the sound > > even when using an headset. > > I'm willing to bet your last experience was a few years ago - while > choppy video and sound are still a feature of congested connections, > if both parties are using decent ISPs, then Internet congestion should > not be a problem, providing you don't try to make a call using more > bandwidth than your modems/connection throughput can handle. > > > Couple all that up with that to use a webcam you need a PC in the first > > place (there are still some people out there without them you know and don't > > have a desire to get one) and you need someone at each end with enough > > technical savvy to get both webcams at each end working correctly to > > establish a connection. > > I think you've got the precise market the Beemer TV product could reach > - people who don't have, and dont want a PC. Unfortunately, at EUR 428.00 > for a working pair of devices, I think you may be looking for volunteers > in the wrong forum - Usenet. Its a lot of money by anyones standards, > given the functionality, and lets face it, most people in ie.general > have access to a PC (anyone out there with a teletype?). > > Brian.
Yes 428.00 EURO sounds a lot for the two units, Sounds a bit better in UK Pounds (299.00 UK£) shame that the prices are not cheaper but maybe they would be if they became popular. If you were going to get a pair of units one for yourself and one for your friend/family/colleague then you could share the cost of the two units to make it cheaper.
I don't see why the telco's like eircom in Ireland and BT in the UK don't get in on the act and start renting these units out to their customers might be a good idea.
|
|
 | | From: | Brian Boyle | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | 11 Jan 2005 14:20:06 GMT |
|
|
 | On 2005-01-11, Andy wrote: > Yes, its a shame they didn't make the units with a 56k Chip in them.
Actually, now that I think of it, they cannot make them work with 56K technology. All 56Kps modems require a digital exchange on the far end, with ISDN delivery to 56K capable modem banks. If both ends are analog modems, the old max of 33.6Kps applies.
> I don't see why the telco's like eircom in Ireland and BT in the > UK don't get in on the act and start renting these units out to > their customers might be a good idea.
I do - the equipment is low cost from a telco perspective - not much different to a DSL modem (maybe +/- EUR 70). Why manage rental contracts, with all their headaches (depreciating assets, repair and replacement responsibilities, etc) for such low value, low volume stuff? If they got involved at all, they'd only be interested in sales, not hiring, leasing or some combination.
Brian.
|
|
 | | From: | John | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:14:25 +0000 |
|
|
 | When you say "a picture" do you mean just a still image?
|
|
 | | From: | Andy | | Subject: | Re: Seeing people as you phone them | | Date: | Sun, 9 Jan 2005 17:20:56 -0000 |
|
|
 | "John" wrote in message news:b2m2u0posje7o8fqaod5nl6sj4c1dob59r@4ax.com... > When you say "a picture" do you mean just a still image?
This Beamer TV Unit I am referring to will give you moving images and in Colour it may be a bit choppy though because of the frame rate of video it uses I think it uses up to 15fps frames per second where TV pictures has up to 30fps but even so the novelty/satisfaction factor of it is that you can actually see people as you are talking to them and imagine seeing your newborn grandchild or a friend you have not seen for years or a wife still being able to see her husband whilst he is away on business when she phones him!! - the choppy video might not be too much of an issue and also there is an adjustment on the beamer to make the motion more 'fluid like' and degrade a bit on the video quality or more jerky but clearer picture.
You can also chose to just send a high quality 'still' picture of yourself to the other person to view whilst you are having a conversation and when you are ready to start 'moving' video you just press a button again to start it.
|
|
|