|
|
 | | From: | jackeroo | | Subject: | If the vote is crooked/fixed/ corrupted you havent a Democracy? | | Date: | Sun, 19 Dec 2004 13:30:55 GMT |
|
|
 | It's like forged movie or football tickets? The forgeries are discovered
before the game is over nut they are allowed to retain their seats and the
genuine ticket holders are locked out?
"Gee" wrote in message
news:YnCld.8044$z81.2007@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
>
http://memes.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=3667&mode
=thread&order=0&thold=0
>
> Voting Fraud in the USA
> Did you know....
>
> a.. 80% of all votes in America are counted by only two companies:
> Diebold and ES&S.
>
> b.. There is no federal agency with regulatory authority or oversight of
> the U.S. voting machine industry.
>
> c.. The vice-president of Diebold and the president of ES&S are brothers.
>
> d.. The chairman and CEO of Diebold is a major Bush campaign organizer
> and donor who wrote in 2003 that he was "committed to helping Ohio deliver
> its electoral votes to the president next year."
>
> e.. 35% of ES&S is owned by Republican Senator Chuck Hagel, who became
> Senator based on votes counted by ES&S machines.
Kah...kah..kah..
Let the americans taste whats its like
to be ruled by a fraudulent regime just like
the many they supported all over south america
and mid east.
Welcome to third world politics...dumbass americans...
LOL.
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20041206&s=corn2
Bloggers, e-voting foes and concerned citizens keep raising questions and
hurling charges about the November 2 voting and vote-counting, especially in
the fulcrum state of Ohio.
What a giggle - the home of democracy?
The voting machines in the selected New Hampshire wards were
> purchased after manufacture and installation by Diebold Corporation,
> whose top officers were major contributors to the Bush campaign. The
> software on which votes are counted is protected as a corporate
> trade secret
http://uscountvotes.org/
27,000 anecdotal reports of irregularities in the 2004 election were
submitted to the independent "Election Incident Reporting System". An
alleged pattern of discrepancies between exit poll results and final tallies
in several key states is still regarded with suspicion by many observers
|
|
|
