|
|
 | | From: | Ned Lilly | | Subject: | nice work on the new site | | Date: | Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:41:31 -0500 |
|
|
 | To everyone who put in what's clearly a lot of time in building the new website, well done! I think the combination of the 8.0 release and a dramatically more professional website will do wonders for PostgreSQL.
Kudos!
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
|
|
 | | From: | Rick Morris | | Subject: | Re: nice work on the new site | | Date: | Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:05:34 -0500 |
|
|
 | I *really* like the new design also, although one small detail niggles me: the tagline says "The world's most advanced open source database". I know it is fairly common nowadays to use the term 'database' when you are really referring to a database management system (DBMS), but it just drives me nuts. Historically, the PostgreSQL team has been known for using correct terminology, in spite of trends.
Any thoughts, anyone? At least, could we compromise and say "The world's most advanced open source database server"?
Ned Lilly wrote: > To everyone who put in what's clearly a lot of time in building the new > website, well done! I think the combination of the 8.0 release and a > dramatically more professional website will do wonders for PostgreSQL. > > Kudos! > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match > >
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
|
|
 | | From: | Joshua D. Drake | | Subject: | Re: nice work on the new site | | Date: | Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:02:30 -0800 |
|
|
 | This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040604090402060004040205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Rick Morris wrote: > I *really* like the new design also, although one small detail niggles > me: the tagline says "The world's most advanced open source database". I > know it is fairly common nowadays to use the term 'database' when you > are really referring to a database management system (DBMS), but it just > drives me nuts. Historically, the PostgreSQL team has been known for > using correct terminology, in spite of trends. > > Any thoughts, anyone? At least, could we compromise and say "The world's > most advanced open source database server"?
A PHB will know to the term database as database server and server as a machine.
Although I appreciate your point. I think the current wording is appropriate. I could see:
"The world's most advanced open source database software"?
> > Ned Lilly wrote: > >> To everyone who put in what's clearly a lot of time in building the >> new website, well done! I think the combination of the 8.0 release >> and a dramatically more professional website will do wonders for >> PostgreSQL. >> >> Kudos! >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if >> your >> joining column's datatypes do not match >> >> > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match
-- Command Prompt, Inc., home of PostgreSQL Replication, and plPHP. Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
--------------040604090402060004040205 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8; name="jd.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="jd.vcf"
begin:vcard fn:Joshua D. Drake n:Drake;Joshua D. org:Command Prompt, Inc. adr:;;PO Box 215;Cascade Locks;Oregon;97014;USA email;internet:jd@commandprompt.com title:Consultant tel;work:503-667-4564 tel;fax:503-210-0334 note:Command Prompt, Inc. is the largest and oldest US based commercial PostgreSQL support provider. We provide the only commercially viable integrated PostgreSQL replication solution, but also custom programming, and support. We authored the book Practical PostgreSQL, the procedural language plPHP, and adding trigger capability to plPerl. x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.commandprompt.com/ version:2.1 end:vcard
--------------040604090402060004040205 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
--------------040604090402060004040205--
|
|
 | | From: | Rick Morris | | Subject: | Re: nice work on the new site | | Date: | Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:20:16 -0500 |
|
|
 | I see your point and raise you +1
"The world's most advanced open source database software" seems like a great compromise.
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Rick Morris wrote: > >> I *really* like the new design also, although one small detail niggles >> me: the tagline says "The world's most advanced open source database". >> I know it is fairly common nowadays to use the term 'database' when >> you are really referring to a database management system (DBMS), but >> it just drives me nuts. Historically, the PostgreSQL team has been >> known for using correct terminology, in spite of trends. >> >> Any thoughts, anyone? At least, could we compromise and say "The >> world's most advanced open source database server"? > > > A PHB will know to the term database as database server and server as a > machine. > > Although I appreciate your point. I think the current wording is > appropriate. I could see: > > "The world's most advanced open source database software"? > > >> >> Ned Lilly wrote: >> >>> To everyone who put in what's clearly a lot of time in building the >>> new website, well done! I think the combination of the 8.0 release >>> and a dramatically more professional website will do wonders for >>> PostgreSQL. >>> >>> Kudos! >>> >>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >>> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if >>> your >>> joining column's datatypes do not match >>> >>> >> >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if >> your >> joining column's datatypes do not match > > >
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
|
|
|