knowledge-database (beta)

Current group: pgsql.hackers

Re: ARC patent

Re: ARC patent  
John Hansen
 Re: ARC patent  
Joshua D. Drake
 Re: ARC patent  
Jonah H. Harris
 Re: ARC patent  
Tom Lane
 Re: ARC patent  
Joshua D. Drake
 Re: ARC patent  
Greg Stark
 Re: ARC patent  
Bruce Momjian
From:John Hansen
Subject:Re: ARC patent
Date:Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:02:37 +1100
Folks,

Asking this again as it seems my question got lost, or at least unanswered.

Why not just contact IBM, and get their opinion?

As I said before, we might just get a promise of a full licence for if/when the patent is granted.

.... John

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From:Joshua D. Drake
Subject:Re: ARC patent
Date:Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:12:16 -0800
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060000070307040107000506
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

John Hansen wrote:

>Folks,
>
>Asking this again as it seems my question got lost, or at least unanswered.
>
>Why not just contact IBM, and get their opinion?
>
>
1. We don't have attorneys to do so.
2. The PostgreSQL community is not a legal entity it can license to.
3. It would take weeks if not months to get an answer
4. The patent isn't issed yet.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


>As I said before, we might just get a promise of a full licence for if/when the patent is granted.
>
>... John
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


--------------060000070307040107000506
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8;
name="jd.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="jd.vcf"

begin:vcard
fn:Joshua Drake
n:Drake;Joshua
org:Command Prompt, Inc.
adr:;;PO Box 215 ;Cascade Locks;OR;97014;US
email;internet:jd@commandprompt.com
title:Consultant
tel;work:503-667-4564
tel;fax:503-210-0334
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.commandprompt.com
version:2.1
end:vcard


--------------060000070307040107000506
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)

--------------060000070307040107000506--
From:Jonah H. Harris
Subject:Re: ARC patent
Date:Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:49:54 -0700
We could still get their opinion.

I have a couple aquaintances at IBM that I can try to contact about it.
Rather than assume what IBM will do, why not just ask them? If they
don't respond, they don't respond. If they do respond, it's better than
us guessing.

Yes, it's only going to matter if the patent is issued, but why not make
an effort to get some info from them?


Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> John Hansen wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Asking this again as it seems my question got lost, or at least
>> unanswered.
>>
>> Why not just contact IBM, and get their opinion?
>>
>>
> 1. We don't have attorneys to do so.
> 2. The PostgreSQL community is not a legal entity it can license to.
> 3. It would take weeks if not months to get an answer
> 4. The patent isn't issed yet.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>> As I said before, we might just get a promise of a full licence for
>> if/when the patent is granted.
>>
>> ... John
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>>
>>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>
>


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
From:Tom Lane
Subject:Re: ARC patent
Date:Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:57:22 -0500
"Jonah H. Harris" writes:
> I have a couple aquaintances at IBM that I can try to contact about it.
> Rather than assume what IBM will do, why not just ask them? If they
> don't respond, they don't respond. If they do respond, it's better than
> us guessing.

People seem to be assuming that asking IBM is a zero-risk thing. It's not.
If they are forced to deal with the issue, they might well feel that
they have to take action that we'd not like; whereas as long as it's not
officially in front of them, they can pretend to ignore us.

This is not a whole lot different from our situation today: now that the
issue of the pending patent is officially in front of us, we have to
deal with it.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
From:Joshua D. Drake
Subject:Re: ARC patent
Date:Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:58:05 -0800
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070702040302090204060407
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jonah H. Harris wrote:

> We could still get their opinion.
>
> I have a couple aquaintances at IBM that I can try to contact about
> it. Rather than assume what IBM will do, why not just ask them? If
> they don't respond, they don't respond. If they do respond, it's
> better than us guessing.
>
> Yes, it's only going to matter if the patent is issued, but why not
> make an effort to get some info from them?

Well I believe it is Core's decision to make.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drkae



>
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> John Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> Asking this again as it seems my question got lost, or at least
>>> unanswered.
>>>
>>> Why not just contact IBM, and get their opinion?
>>>
>>>
>> 1. We don't have attorneys to do so.
>> 2. The PostgreSQL community is not a legal entity it can license to.
>> 3. It would take weeks if not months to get an answer
>> 4. The patent isn't issed yet.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Joshua D. Drake
>>
>>
>>> As I said before, we might just get a promise of a full licence for
>>> if/when the patent is granted.
>>>
>>> ... John
>>>
>>> ---------------------------(end of
>>> broadcast)---------------------------
>>> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org



--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL


--------------070702040302090204060407
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8;
name="jd.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="jd.vcf"

begin:vcard
fn:Joshua Drake
n:Drake;Joshua
org:Command Prompt, Inc.
adr:;;PO Box 215 ;Cascade Locks;OR;97014;US
email;internet:jd@commandprompt.com
title:Consultant
tel;work:503-667-4564
tel;fax:503-210-0334
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.commandprompt.com
version:2.1
end:vcard


--------------070702040302090204060407
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org

--------------070702040302090204060407--
From:Greg Stark
Subject:Re: ARC patent
Date:21 Jan 2005 20:13:50 -0500

"Joshua D. Drake" writes:

> John Hansen wrote:
>
> >Folks,
> >
> >Asking this again as it seems my question got lost, or at least unanswered.
> >
> >Why not just contact IBM, and get their opinion?
> >
> 1. We don't have attorneys to do so.
> 2. The PostgreSQL community is not a legal entity it can license to.
> 3. It would take weeks if not months to get an answer
> 4. The patent isn't issed yet.

Don't forget:

5. They would also have to license everyone else who might want to repackage
or use Postgres. Such as Fujitsu, a big competitor of theirs.

--
greg


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From:Bruce Momjian
Subject:Re: ARC patent
Date:Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:34:06 -0500 (EST)
John Hansen wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Asking this again as it seems my question got lost, or at least
> unanswered.
>
> Why not just contact IBM, and get their opinion?
>
> As I said before, we might just get a promise of a full licence for
> if/when the patent is granted.

I doubt we can get a license that would cover companies that package
PostgreSQL. While I don't think they would attack them I also don't
think they can give a blanket approval in writing.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
   

Copyright © 2006 knowledge-database   -   All rights reserved