 | | From: | Eric Caloone | | Subject: | Warp | | Date: | Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:46:57 +0100 |
|
|
 | It runs on OS/2 Warp 4 too (Postgres V8 RC3).
--
/
/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
|
|
| | From: | Peter Eisentraut | | Subject: | Re: Warp | | Date: | Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:02:58 +0100 |
|
|
| Eric Caloone wrote:
> It runs on OS/2 Warp 4 too (Postgres V8 RC3).
That is pretty hard to believe, since the code we distribute contains
neither shared library support nor spinlock support nor any of the
other port specific tweaks for OS/2. And someone else is currently
working on porting to OS/2. What's up with that?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
|
|
| | From: | Bruce Momjian | | Subject: | Re: Warp | | Date: | Sun, 9 Jan 2005 15:39:06 -0500 (EST) |
|
|
| Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Eric Caloone wrote:
> > It runs on OS/2 Warp 4 too (Postgres V8 RC3).
>
> That is pretty hard to believe, since the code we distribute contains
> neither shared library support nor spinlock support nor any of the
> other port specific tweaks for OS/2. And someone else is currently
> working on porting to OS/2. What's up with that?
Someone posted an 8.0rc4 binary and it is mentioned in the current FAQ,
so yea, I think it works.
http://hobbes.nmsu.edu/cgi-bin/h-search?sh=1&button=Search&key=postgreSQL&stype=all&sort=type&dir=%2F
I assume the source is included.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
|
|
| | From: | Tom Lane | | Subject: | Re: Warp | | Date: | Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:15:03 -0500 |
|
|
| Bruce Momjian writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Eric Caloone wrote:
>>> It runs on OS/2 Warp 4 too (Postgres V8 RC3).
>>
>> That is pretty hard to believe, since the code we distribute contains
>> neither shared library support nor spinlock support nor any of the
>> other port specific tweaks for OS/2. And someone else is currently
>> working on porting to OS/2. What's up with that?
> Someone posted an 8.0rc4 binary and it is mentioned in the current FAQ,
> so yea, I think it works.
Posting a binary doesn't mean that they didn't have to hack the source.
As of 8.0 the spinlock support should be driven by CPU type not OS type,
so as long as you build using a compiler that defines standard CPU
symbols it should work. In particular I'd expect a gcc build on OS/2 to
not have any issues about spinlocks.
Shared libraries are another story --- there is no way we'd build shared
libraries successfully without a Makefile.os2 and some additions to
Makefile.shlib. Given the importance of plpgsql I don't think we could
consider a build with --disable-shared to be a "supported platform".
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
|
|
| | From: | Bruce Momjian | | Subject: | Re: Warp | | Date: | Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:59:20 -0500 (EST) |
|
|
| Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Eric Caloone wrote:
> >>> It runs on OS/2 Warp 4 too (Postgres V8 RC3).
> >>
> >> That is pretty hard to believe, since the code we distribute contains
> >> neither shared library support nor spinlock support nor any of the
> >> other port specific tweaks for OS/2. And someone else is currently
> >> working on porting to OS/2. What's up with that?
>
> > Someone posted an 8.0rc4 binary and it is mentioned in the current FAQ,
> > so yea, I think it works.
>
> Posting a binary doesn't mean that they didn't have to hack the source.
>
> As of 8.0 the spinlock support should be driven by CPU type not OS type,
> so as long as you build using a compiler that defines standard CPU
> symbols it should work. In particular I'd expect a gcc build on OS/2 to
> not have any issues about spinlocks.
>
> Shared libraries are another story --- there is no way we'd build shared
> libraries successfully without a Makefile.os2 and some additions to
> Makefile.shlib. Given the importance of plpgsql I don't think we could
> consider a build with --disable-shared to be a "supported platform".
I assume OS/2 is like our Novell port in that it doesn't compile using
our CVS source but only with modified source.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
|
|
| | From: | Tom Lane | | Subject: | Re: Warp | | Date: | Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:02:33 -0500 |
|
|
| Bruce Momjian writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Posting a binary doesn't mean that they didn't have to hack the source.
> I assume OS/2 is like our Novell port in that it doesn't compile using
> our CVS source but only with modified source.
We don't have a Novell port --- it is not, and should not be, listed as
a "supported platform" if it requires hacking the source.
There may be a Novell port out there, but I don't take any
responsibility for it ;-)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
|
|
| | From: | Bruce Momjian | | Subject: | Re: Warp | | Date: | Sun, 9 Jan 2005 17:05:37 -0500 (EST) |
|
|
| Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Posting a binary doesn't mean that they didn't have to hack the source.
>
> > I assume OS/2 is like our Novell port in that it doesn't compile using
> > our CVS source but only with modified source.
>
> We don't have a Novell port --- it is not, and should not be, listed as
> a "supported platform" if it requires hacking the source.
>
> There may be a Novell port out there, but I don't take any
> responsibility for it ;-)
Right, I assume the same for OS/2. It is mentioned in the FAQ and has
a URL. That's as far as we can go until the OS/2 port person submits
information on what changes he had to make to get it to work and we
incorporate his changes in our code.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
|
|
