|
|
 | | From: | Schwolop | | Subject: | Re: Jugglers Code | | Date: | 17 Jan 2005 23:55:02 GMT |
|
|
 | In <41eba9fe$0$23056$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> on 17/01/05 11:05 PM,
Marden117 wrote:
> I live for the amusement. Oh...Schwolop. I also juggle various 5 ball
> tricks and can qualify 7 balls for
> about 50 catches max but I find it boring. Each to their own style I
> suppose but don't go saying
> multiplex tricks are easy until you can do a multiplex trick with 8 or
> more balls.
>
> ----== posted via www.jugglingdb.com ==----
>
>
Hey, I'm not paying out your juggling mate, I'm just amused that
everyone else is!
And anyway, I do shitloads of multiplexes, I just never bother working
out the siteswaps because mostly I just gather shitloads of balls in one
hand and throw them more or less randomly. I've done some trick with all
the balls I own. I have no idea what the siteswap would be, but it's got
12 balls in it. You pretty much end up throwing four balls at a time in
a sort of 3 ball shaped cascade so I guess it's got some resemblence to [
666x6x] with 2's at various points to make it work. I definitely think
the best multiplexes are shower explosions, and I can't for the life of
me do splits well enough so I'll stick with my stupid stuff. It's much
more fun!
BTW, sort of off topic, but do you ever try multiplexes with clubs?
There's probably lots of stuff you could try there...
--
Tom
junk@jugglethis.net with my name instead of junk...
|
|
| | From: | Marden117 | | Subject: | Re: Jugglers Code | | Date: | 18 Jan 2005 13:37:56 GMT |
|
|
| > Hey, I'm not paying out your juggling mate, I'm just amused that
> everyone else is!
> And anyway, I do shitloads of multiplexes, I just never bother working
> out the siteswaps because mostly I just gather shitloads of balls in one
> hand and throw them more or less randomly. I've done some trick with all
> the balls I own. I have no idea what the siteswap would be, but it's got
> 12 balls in it. You pretty much end up throwing four balls at a time in
> a sort of 3 ball shaped cascade so I guess it's got some resemblence to [
> 666x6x] with 2's at various points to make it work. I definitely think
> the best multiplexes are shower explosions, and I can't for the life of
> me do splits well enough so I'll stick with my stupid stuff. It's much
> more fun!
>
> BTW, sort of off topic, but do you ever try multiplexes with clubs?
> There's probably lots of stuff you could try there...
Sorry geezer...I meant to put erik's name not yours.
I didn't read my message after I sent it else I would've replied saying
just that.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not angry with anyone, just going through a f*cked
up time now.
Suppose drugs do that to a person but it's my problem and know I shouldn't
have been a loser by
spamming rec.juggling.
BTW...ever get that 12ball multiplex on camera?
----== posted via www.jugglingdb.com ==----
|
|
|
