 | | From: | Badger | | Subject: | Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:00:46 -0500 |
|
|
 | (Not affil.)
Saw an ad for this in one of the issues of Tactical Knives in the last year or so; these are some nice looking blades.
http://www.thrblades.com/gallery.htm
Opinions?
-B
|
|
 | | From: | Greyangel | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:31:45 -0800 |
|
|
 | I've never seen one up close but just from the picture I'm thinking that "Damascus tactical" thing is just paint on steel. I doubt if there is true pattern welded steel in that thing. As for the knives themselves... No opinion.
GA
"Badger" wrote in message news:63anu0dq7ln02dklub660qnags28qmqks4@4ax.com... > > (Not affil.) > > Saw an ad for this in one of the issues of Tactical Knives in the last year > or so; these are some nice looking blades. > > http://www.thrblades.com/gallery.htm > > Opinions? > > -B > >
|
|
 | | From: | WKF | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:42:00 GMT |
|
|
 | "paint on steel"...You're kidding, right?
" I doubt if there is true pattern welded steel in that thing."... I doubt if you know what you're talking about.
"Greyangel" wrote in message news:0L6dnYFp-tyfa3bcRVn-uQ@comcast.com... > I've never seen one up close but just from the picture I'm thinking that > "Damascus tactical" thing is just paint on steel. I doubt if there is > true pattern welded steel in that thing. As for the knives themselves... > No > opinion. > > GA > > "Badger" wrote in message > news:63anu0dq7ln02dklub660qnags28qmqks4@4ax.com... >> >> (Not affil.) >> >> Saw an ad for this in one of the issues of Tactical Knives in the last > year >> or so; these are some nice looking blades. >> >> http://www.thrblades.com/gallery.htm >> >> Opinions? >> >> -B >> >> > >
|
|
 | | From: | Greyangel | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:17:38 -0800 |
|
|
 | No I DON'T know what I'm talking about. Just looked funny from the picture. Like it wasn't real pattern weld. Partly because of the shiny line along the edge. I didn't say it was crap, just that it didn't look right. I've seen stuff that was just painted on in the past. It looked like that. That is the reason why I don't care for some of the real pattern weld steel. The wrong mix of materials makes it look cheesey in my opinion. I love pattern welded stuff when it's subtle. The really obnoxious stuff I can do without. I'm entitled to my opinion and nobody has to like it.
GA
"WKF" wrote in message news:c53Hd.158891$AL5.157457@twister.nyroc.rr.com... > "paint on steel"...You're kidding, right? > > " I doubt if there is true pattern welded steel in that thing."... I doubt > if you know what you're talking about. > > > "Greyangel" wrote in message > news:0L6dnYFp-tyfa3bcRVn-uQ@comcast.com... > > I've never seen one up close but just from the picture I'm thinking that > > "Damascus tactical" thing is just paint on steel. I doubt if there is > > true pattern welded steel in that thing. As for the knives themselves... > > No > > opinion. > > > > GA > > > > "Badger" wrote in message > > news:63anu0dq7ln02dklub660qnags28qmqks4@4ax.com... > >> > >> (Not affil.) > >> > >> Saw an ad for this in one of the issues of Tactical Knives in the last > > year > >> or so; these are some nice looking blades. > >> > >> http://www.thrblades.com/gallery.htm > >> > >> Opinions? > >> > >> -B > >> > >> > > > > > >
|
|
 | | From: | Chas | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:07:15 -0700 |
|
|
 | "Greyangel" wrote > Like it wasn't real pattern weld. Partly because of the shiny line along > the edge.
Yeah; it's a bright pattern all right. I think they did a straight stack of disparate metals and then either filed the steps or maybe cross-peened the distortion. It's hard to come up with bad pattern-weld anymore. Even the gang-hammered stuff from Peshawar ain't bad- the etching sucks and the heat-treatment can be refined, but the material is pretty workable.
Chas
|
|
 | | From: | Greyangel | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 04:59:48 -0800 |
|
|
 | Another thing that bugs me about this knife is that it "appears" to be made out of really thin stock. The geometry looks too flat. Part of the problem here is the site tells you zip about blade. No dimentions, no materials. All you can go on is a picture and to me at least it looks like there wasn't much effort put into the blade. Granted there's nothing simple about pattern welded material but that doesn't mean the knife maker even had anything to do with that part of it. So much negativity... maybe I just need to eat some chocolate and get my nails done ;-)
GA
"Chas" wrote in message news:2pidnXwVOaNNXXDcRVn-gg@comcast.com... > "Greyangel" wrote > > Like it wasn't real pattern weld. Partly because of the shiny line along > > the edge. > > Yeah; it's a bright pattern all right. > I think they did a straight stack of disparate metals and then either filed > the steps or maybe cross-peened the distortion. > It's hard to come up with bad pattern-weld anymore. Even the gang-hammered > stuff from Peshawar ain't bad- the etching sucks and the heat-treatment can > be refined, but the material is pretty workable. > > Chas > >
|
|
 | | From: | Chas | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 06:24:51 -0700 |
|
|
 | "Greyangel" wrote > Another thing that bugs me about this knife is that it "appears" to be > made > out of really thin stock. The geometry looks too flat.
I like flat-ground blades, and one of the reasons to prefer pattern-weld is the strength to weight ratio- insofar as snapping catastrophically. My favorite 'camp'/bivouac knife is 5 7/8" out of 1/8" stock- and flat-ground to boot. I'm sure it would bend eventually, but never fail suddenly.
Chas
|
|
 | | From: | Greyangel | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:29:50 -0800 |
|
|
 | Hey, you want a really good cutter you need a thinner blade. I just have an unreasonable preference for thick stock. No thinner than necessary to gut a fish ;) Don't much care for little fish either. The taste is way over rated. I'll take the big fat German Brown any day. But back to knives - As I've said before, use the tool that's appropriate for the job. If I want a blade I can get excited about I want to be able to chop wood and poke it in a tree and stand on it - or chip the rocks it hits when I miss the tree ;-)
GA
"Chas" wrote in message news:F4ednRzSdKwDwnPcRVn-qQ@comcast.com... > "Greyangel" wrote > > Another thing that bugs me about this knife is that it "appears" to be > > made > > out of really thin stock. The geometry looks too flat. > > I like flat-ground blades, and one of the reasons to prefer pattern-weld is > the strength to weight ratio- insofar as snapping catastrophically. > My favorite 'camp'/bivouac knife is 5 7/8" out of 1/8" stock- and > flat-ground to boot. I'm sure it would bend eventually, but never fail > suddenly. > > Chas > >
|
|
 | | From: | Chas | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:38:21 -0700 |
|
|
 | "Greyangel" wrote > .....If I want a > blade I can get excited about I want to be able to chop wood and poke it > in > a tree and stand on it - or chip the rocks it hits when I miss the tree > ;-)
Then pattern-weld is your choice- make a knife from it that is the same weight/proportions as a self-steel blade, and it's going to be exponentially stronger.
Chas
|
|
 | | From: | Greyangel | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:38:01 -0800 |
|
|
 | "Chas" wrote in message news:0IKdnUBkC_PaKXLcRVn-oQ@comcast.com... > "Greyangel" wrote > > .....If I want a > > blade I can get excited about I want to be able to chop wood and poke it > > in > > a tree and stand on it - or chip the rocks it hits when I miss the tree > > ;-) > > Then pattern-weld is your choice- make a knife from it that is the same > weight/proportions as a self-steel blade, and it's going to be exponentially > stronger. > Chas
Chas buddy, I've got road to travel yet before I'm ready to seriously do any forge welding. Yeah, you probably can't beat a forge welded blade but I'm inclined to think that the best of it is the structurally layered ones as opposed to the pattern layered stuff. Any rate it is possible to make a mono steel blade that is damn near indestructable. Adding forge welded materials is just going the extra mile. Certainly the goal but "exponentially stronger"??? - hell there's different reasons and different applications. Depends on what you want it for.
GA
|
|
 | | From: | Chas | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:00:49 -0700 |
|
|
 | "Greyangel" wrote >.....Yeah, you probably can't beat a forge welded blade but > I'm inclined to think that the best of it is the structurally layered ones > as opposed to the pattern layered stuff.
Or in the style of nipponto, making the steels for the casing construction out of composite steel.
> Any rate it is possible to make a > mono steel blade that is damn near indestructable.
Yup- although again, the weight to strength ratio may be very different.
> ......Certainly the goal but > "exponentially stronger"??? - hell there's different reasons and > different > applications. Depends on what you want it for.
We're talking catastrophic failure. A pattern welded blade is to a self-steel blade as a wire cable is to a rod. The rod will fail before the cable, and more catastrophically at that.
Chas
|
|
 | | From: | Mark South | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2005 00:04:19 +0100 |
|
|
 | On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:38:21 -0700, Chas wrote:
> "Greyangel" wrote >> .....If I want a >> blade I can get excited about I want to be able to chop wood and poke it >> in >> a tree and stand on it - or chip the rocks it hits when I miss the tree >> ;-) > > Then pattern-weld is your choice- make a knife from it that is the same > weight/proportions as a self-steel blade, and it's going to be exponentially > stronger.
Please quote the exponent to 2 decimal places, Chas. -- Mark South: World Citizen, Net Denizen
|
|
 | | From: | Chas | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:34:42 -0700 |
|
|
 | "Mark South" wrote >> Then pattern-weld is your choice- make a knife from it that is the same >> weight/proportions as a self-steel blade, and it's going to be >> exponentially >> stronger. > Please quote the exponent to 2 decimal places, Chas.
If you have a rebuttal, you'll have to do your own work. Do you?
Chas
|
|
 | | From: | Mark South | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:19:44 +0100 |
|
|
 | On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:34:42 -0700, Chas wrote:
> "Mark South" wrote >>> Then pattern-weld is your choice- make a knife from it that is the same >>> weight/proportions as a self-steel blade, and it's going to be >>> exponentially >>> stronger. >> Please quote the exponent to 2 decimal places, Chas. > > If you have a rebuttal, you'll have to do your own work.
I enjoyed the Chas-ism of "exponentially stronger".
In the same way, you could claim to be "exponentially smarter", or "exponentially faster".
BTW, ITYM "If I have a rebuttal, then I have already *done* my own work".
> Do you?
The exponent will be a number *very* close to unity, and it's not obvious which side.
It's cool that I still make you feel exponentially defensive. -- Mark South: World Citizen, Net Denizen
|
|
 | | From: | Chas | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:40:23 -0700 |
|
|
 | "Mark South" wrote > I enjoyed the Chas-ism of "exponentially stronger".
And have no rebuttal for it at all.
> The exponent will be a number *very* close to unity, and it's not obvious > which side.
Actually, it is. In every destruction test I've ever heard of, that compared composite steel to self-steel, composite steel took far longer to fail catastrophically than the self-steel.
> It's cool that I still make you feel exponentially defensive.
No; you're just silly. The point, however, is well-made about the comparative utility of the steels.
Chas
|
|
 | | From: | Dave K | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:29:28 -0800 |
|
|
 | On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:40:23 -0700, "Chas" wrote:
>"Mark South" wrote >> I enjoyed the Chas-ism of "exponentially stronger". > >And have no rebuttal for it at all. > >> The exponent will be a number *very* close to unity, and it's not obvious >> which side. > >Actually, it is. >In every destruction test I've ever heard of, that compared composite steel >to self-steel, composite steel took far longer to fail catastrophically than >the self-steel. > >> It's cool that I still make you feel exponentially defensive. > >No; you're just silly. >The point, however, is well-made about the comparative utility of the >steels. > >Chas >
Might as well get the math straight: An exponent of unity gives a factor equal to whatever base you're working with, like 10, 2, or e (the base of natural logs). An exponent of zero gives a factor of unity, regardless of the base.
Dave
|
|
 | | From: | Chas | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:31:01 -0700 |
|
|
 | "Dave K" wrote > Might as well get the math straight:
Wasn't speaking math. The fact that 'math' has co-opted a word from the language to describe some function as a term of art is irrelevant. The reverse is also true; a term of art formerly restricted to some specialty becomes an idiom of common language and ceases to have it's former definition or usage. funny that.
Chas
|
|
 | | From: | alvinj at XX.com | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:08:28 +0000 (UTC) |
|
|
 | > In every destruction test I've ever heard of, that compared > composite steel to self-steel, composite steel took far longer > to fail catastrophically than the self-steel. > Chas
Doggonit we need Howard Clark for this one. :/ (BillH or GA, can you bring it up on the knife-list?)
Off hand I'm guessing bainite will out perform any of it. Then there are different kinds of pearlite to compare too. And then, which steels are layered into what pattern?
Bainite is a form of decomposed-austenite just like martensite is. It's just that to form bainite the austenite is quickly quenched and then held at like 750F for as long as a day. Not too many knives made of bainite out there but Howard Clark sometimes makes 'em. ;)
Alvin in AZ
|
|
 | | From: | Chas | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:31:32 -0700 |
|
|
 | wrote > Off hand I'm guessing bainite will out perform any of it.
How many times will it take a 90 deg. angle bend from side to side? When it fails, does it fail catastrophically (that is to say, snaps), or does it simply crack partway?
Chas
|
|
 | | From: | brian w edginton | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 01:07:02 GMT |
|
|
 | On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:17:38 -0800, "Greyangel" wrote:
>No I DON'T know what I'm talking about. Just looked funny from the picture. >Like it wasn't real pattern weld. Partly because of the shiny line along >the edge. I didn't say it was crap, just that it didn't look right. I've >seen stuff that was just painted on in the past. It looked like that. That >is the reason why I don't care for some of the real pattern weld steel. The >wrong mix of materials makes it look cheesey in my opinion. I love pattern >welded stuff when it's subtle. The really obnoxious stuff I can do without. >I'm entitled to my opinion and nobody has to like it. > >GA >
Personally, I have never seen or heard of "painted-on" patterns. Have seen cheap knives that have had a pattern ETCHED on. The shiny edge is inevitable because it is ground. The pattern on most "damascus" blades is highlighted by chemical application that affects the two metals differently making the pattern stand out. Sharpening (grinding) the edge removes the chemical effect leaving a shiny edge.
Actually, I don't like "unsubtle" patterns a lot, either. brianWE Been there, done that.....but so have others. Without the DNA, you can't prove a thing!
|
|
 | | From: | Chas | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:01:35 -0700 |
|
|
 | "Greyangel" wrote > I've never seen one up close but just from the picture I'm thinking that > "Damascus tactical" thing is just paint on steel. I doubt if there is > true pattern welded steel in that thing.
Pretty common type pattern- what makes you think it's not right?
Chas
|
|
 | | From: | blues at nospam.net | | Subject: | Re: Trace Rinaldi Customs - thoughts? | | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:36:26 GMT |
|
|
 | On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:00:46 -0500, Badger wrote:
> >(Not affil.) > >Saw an ad for this in one of the issues of Tactical Knives in the last year >or so; these are some nice looking blades. > >http://www.thrblades.com/gallery.htm > >Opinions? > >-B > >
Trace makes some great (using) knives. I have one of his Gambits. I've never heard anything but praise for his work by any of the folks who own his work. Highly recommended.
Blues
Live Free Or Die
|
|