 | of course if you juoge any martial arts systam by one move, wich if
its
the one im thinking of is a beggining onein my school, it will look
ugely and unpreparied for a real fight. as for the robotic part the
person must not have bean that good. aikido is acualy a very free
flowing art. if you have to use any mussle power in the throws and
pins
yore doing it wrong. i am not saying aikido will make you the best
fighter outhare in my opponiun no single combat style will i am
learing
3. aikido is however efictive if you use the right techniugue for the
right attack.
Of course if you judge any martial arts system by one move, which if
its the one I'm thinking of is a beginning ones my school, it will
look ugly and unprepared for a real fight. As for the robotic part the
person must not have bean that good. Aikido is actually a very free
flowing art. If you have to use any muscle power in the throws and
pins yore doing it wrong. I am not saying Aikido will make you the
best fighter out there in my opinion no single combat style will I am
learning
3. Aikido is however effective if you use the right technique for the
right attack.
I fixed your spelling to make it a bit clearer.
As a past student of Aikido (4th Dan) I always found Yoshinkan Aikido
as performed by it's students to be regimented and robotic, it has a
lot to do with the paint by numbers way in which that sort of Aikido
is taught.
The irony is that Gozo Shioda the head honcho of Yoshinkan was rather
more following and naturalistic in his movement unlike his students.
Scary.
|
|
