|
|
 | | From: | The Puppy Wizard | | Subject: | Re: Weimer - "coughing" | | Date: | Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:57:35 GMT |
|
|
 | HOWEDY natalie,
"Natalie Rigertas" wrote in message
news:L4ayd.9639$SX.5748@news.flashnewsgroups.com...
> Nathan Otis wrote:
>
> > A call to the vet this morning and they said
> > "Kennel cough" The dog is from Kansas
> > (low and moist) and we're in Colorado (high
> > and dry) so that's what they're saying is causing it.
THAT'S INSANE. The vet probably didn't
want to cast aspersions on the breeder
for fear of libel.
> > On the high side she get's to come to work
> > with me for the next couple days, since I work
> > 5 minutes from our vet and they prescribed 2
> > nebulizer sessions a day for the next two days.
WONderful. Many vets give strong antibiotics
which of curse CANNOT CURE a VIRUS. When
asked, they JUSTIFY SELLIN ANTIBIOTICS for
a VIRUS to PREVENT a "SECONDARY INFECTION"
aka not havin some EXXXTRA UNDESERVED share
of your hard earned MONEY.
> from Kansas?
Toto was from Kansas.
> Where did you get the dog?
From Kansas, like Toto.
> It could explain how it got kennel cough.
Toto didn't cough...
> natalie
Kennel cough got NUTHIN to do with KENNELS.
To call it kennel cough is a MISNOMER. KC is a
virus like any other "cold" virus and usually goes
away in a few days with NO medical treatment
JUST LIKE ANY COMMON "COLD".
So, blamin the dog bein sick on IT being from
a PUPPY MILL ain't got NUTHIN to do with
HOWE COME the dog IS sick. They GET so
called KENNEL COUGH from casually meetin
ANY OTHER DOG who GOT a VIRUS.
PERHAPS HE GOT IT AT HIS OWN VET
WHEN IT CAME IN FOR HIS CHECK UP.
But that won't stop you or an unethicKal vet
from BLAMIN the PUPPY MILLS for dog behavior
temperament and heelth problems that are primarily
CAUSED BY STRESS from MISHANDLING like
HOWE you do and the EXXXPERTS DO IT...
The Amazing Puppy Wizard <{) ; ~ ) >
Death Producing Ulcers:
"Emotional Influences On Health & Behavior"
Dr. George Von Hilsheimer
Emotional Influences On Behavior
Illness is directly related to depression and lack of
adjustment, particularly to a new environment (Parens,
McConville & Kaplan, 1966).
A WIDE RANGE of PSYCHOSOMATIC or
CORTICOVISCERAL DIS-EASES was surveyed
by Wittkower (1965) to demonstrate the enormous
importance of emotional factors in general health.
Interview findings of emotional material (recently
experienced hopelessness) pryor to biological
examinations correctly identified 11 out of 19 with
cervical cancer, and 25 of 32 who were cancer free
even though psychological tests failed to discriminate
these groups (Schmale & Iker, 1966)
150 lung cancer patients showed significantly
constricted expression of emotions. The had fewer
childhood behavior problems, and lower neuroticism
score than their cancer free controls. Heavy cigarette
smokers who DO NOT INHALE are more apt to have LUNG
CANCER. They, too, show LOWER neuroticism scores.
Among heavy cigarette smokers poor emotional
expression is as highly related to cancer as urban
residence and is more important than a chronic cough
or an air polluted environment (Kissen, 1966).
A ten year observation of all the women who developed
cancer in an isolated pupulation of 2,550 showed that
they tended to be unstable or sub stable personalities
characterized by melancholy and extraversion,
especially marked with those of an undecided body
build (Hagll, 1966). Personality dynamics effect both
the development of cancer and it's SITE. Cancer
may result from what appears to be a failure to grow--
somatically, behaviorally and psychologically
(Grinker, 1966).
In 109 cases leukemia and lymphoma were associated
with a number of losses or separations and with
feelings of sadness, anxiety, anger or hopelessness.
The PRIMARY FACTOR seems to be the shame and
hopelessness of running out of psychological resources
(Green, 1966). Cervical cancer patients are less
emotionally responsive, more isolative, and less
frequently diagnosed as having clinical neuroses than
cancer free patients. There is NO CLEAR DIFFERENCE in
their FEELINGS and ATTITUDES toward coitus (Rotkin,
Qunk, & Couchman, 1965).
Schmidt (1966) surveyed nearly 100 studies of
behaviorally induced DIS-EASE in animals CONFIRMING
and EXTENDING the DATA on PEOPLE. Behaviorally
induced DIS-EASES tend to fall into two groups;
(1) Hysteriform problems, which INCLUDE HYSTERICAL
SEIZURES and FORMS of AGGRESSION as well as
collective panic and epilepsies;
(2) organic modifications, including functional
difficulties
and lesions affecting gastro intestinal, cardio vascular,
respiratory, ual, endocrine, skin, urinary, and neuro
muscular systems.
It is INTERESTING, and SLIGHTLY HORRIFYING,
to note that the ONLY SCIENTIFIC RELEVANCE of
the standard six hour school day that I have been able
to detect in research is that Sawrey and Weisz quite
by accident found that six hours on and six hour off of
"EXECUTIVE BEHAVIOR" in monkeys was the ONLY
TIME STRUCTURE that INDUCED DEATH PRODUCING
ULCERS.
|
|
|
