|
|
 | | From: | Anonymous | | Subject: | Re: OT. One year ago | | Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 04:37:43 +0100 (CET) |
|
|
 | On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 03:32:58 +0100, John R. Macdonald wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:24:39 GMT, "Holier Than Thou"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"John R. Macdonald" wrote in message
>>news:db0pu0tp2q48ub1rk6833ggvauic680dvq@4ax.com...
>>> One year ago to this day a brash rec.scuban (a.k.a. Popeye) posted the
>>> following:
>>> "... 1 year from now, incontravertable (sic) evidence that WMD are, or
>>> were in Irag post 9/11..."
>>> Well a year has come and passed and even the Bush administration has
>>> now officially acknowledged that the search for WMDs in Iraq is over.
>>> Chief inspector Charles Duelfer reported last October that he could
>>> find no evidence of weapons stockpiles or active programs.
>>> Oh dear, does this mean that the main reason put forward to go to war
>>> against Iraq is wrong?
>>> Rather embarrassing isn't it?
>>>
>>
>>
>>You are wasting your time, dude. Popeye is no longer here. He is now in
>>Iraq himself, working as a truck driver. You've got to give the guy credit:
>>he stands behind what he believes in.
>>
>
> I don't always agree with Popeye but I sincerely hope he comes to no
> harm while over there.
He and his ilk should get what they richly deserve.
> Yes Popeye does stand behind what he believes in, unfortunately a lot
> of it is plain wrong. (see above)
Popeye believes in nothing substantive. The difference between Popeye and
a chimp is much less than 2%.
The difference between Bush and a chimp is MUCH less.
|
|
| | From: | Crownfield | | Subject: | Re: OT. One year ago | | Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:09:13 -0800 |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 03:32:58 +0100, John R. Macdonald wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:24:39 GMT, "Holier Than Thou"
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"John R. Macdonald" wrote in message
> >>news:db0pu0tp2q48ub1rk6833ggvauic680dvq@4ax.com...
> >>> One year ago to this day a brash rec.scuban (a.k.a. Popeye) posted the
> >>> following:
> >>> "... 1 year from now, incontravertable (sic) evidence that WMD are, or
> >>> were in Irag post 9/11..."
> >>> Well a year has come and passed and even the Bush administration has
> >>> now officially acknowledged that the search for WMDs in Iraq is over.
> >>> Chief inspector Charles Duelfer reported last October that he could
> >>> find no evidence of weapons stockpiles or active programs.
> >>> Oh dear, does this mean that the main reason put forward to go to war
> >>> against Iraq is wrong?
> >>> Rather embarrassing isn't it?
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>You are wasting your time, dude. Popeye is no longer here. He is now in
> >>Iraq himself, working as a truck driver. You've got to give the guy credit:
> >>he stands behind what he believes in.
> >>
> >
> > I don't always agree with Popeye but I sincerely hope he comes to no
> > harm while over there.
>
> He and his ilk should get what they richly deserve.
>
> > Yes Popeye does stand behind what he believes in, unfortunately a lot
> > of it is plain wrong. (see above)
>
> Popeye believes in nothing substantive. The difference between Popeye and
> a chimp is much less than 2%.
>
> The difference between Bush and a chimp is MUCH less.
and yet between you two and popeye, a large world of difference!
like the signers of the declaration of independance,
popeye puts his life, his fortune and his sacred honor on the line
for the principles and freedoms which he respects and honors.
you?
you stand for nothing.
you just yap like a small cowardly dog
behind the doors of your Anonymity.
|
|
|
