 | >From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0@hate.spam.net)
>Subject: Re: The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian
>View: Complete Thread (4 articles)
>Newsgroups: sci.physics, gac.physics.astronomy, sci.astro,
alt.astronomy, >alt.sci.physics
>Date: 2005-01-20 16:27:44 PST
>SDR wrote:
>> Gravity As Thermodynamics:
>> The Explanation For The Universe.
>>
>> There is a fear among thinkers too clever for their
>> own good that perhaps none of them may prove to be
>> sufficiently smart to understand the universe. Yet,
>> unsuspected by them, it is not that they are not smart
>> enough to understand the universe but that they are
>> too smart... and instead of seeking to understand they
>> instead apply their nervous creativity to dreaming up
>> overly-clever (and ultimately purely imaginative)
>> illusions--an accomplishment which may be the glory of
>> literary fiction, but is forever the bane of science.
>[snip 1350 lines of crap]
Obviously this is as far as this guy read to reach his
"conclusion." It's actually quite flattering to me!
>Provide an empirically viable alternative, idiot.
Sure thing, moron. Just tell me how/where I contradict
your laundry list below. (You forgot to mention the
coffee-milk experiments, by the way.) Grow up for once:
You've been around these newsgroups long enough to be
at least over 40 now. (Empirical evidence provided.)
There!
S D Rodrian
http://poems.sdrodrian.com
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
http://music.sdrodrian.com
re:
>>Michelson-Morley experiments
>>Kennedy-Thorndike experiments
>>Ives-Stilwell experiments
>>Hughes-Drever experiments
>>Weak field
>>
>>Nature 425 374 (2003)
>>http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
>
>
> Relativity in the GPS system
>and strong field,
>Science 303(5661) 1143;1153 (2004)
>http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401086
>http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071
>
> Deeply relativistic neutron star binaries
>If your opinions veer otherwise you are an empirical ass.
>
>http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
>
> Experimental constraints on General Relativity
|
|
