knowledge-database (beta)

Current group: sci.nonlinear

Re: Neato chaotic equations for analog computers to display?

Re: Neato chaotic equations for analog computers to display?  
John Woodgate
 Re: Neato chaotic equations for analog computers to display?  
John Bailey
 Re: Neato chaotic equations for analog computers to display?  
Active8
 Re: Neato chaotic equations for analog computers to display?  
Charlie Gibbs
 Re: Neato chaotic equations for analog computers to display?  
jmfbahciv at aol.com
From:John Woodgate
Subject:Re: Neato chaotic equations for analog computers to display?
Date:Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:56:47 +0000
I read in sci.electronics.design that John Bailey
wrote (in <41c961e9.30717838@news-
server.rochester.rr.com>) about 'Neato chaotic equations for analog
computers to display?', on Wed, 22 Dec 2004:
>There was a useful thread on sci.fractals in 1997

Are all the threads on that group infinitely long? (;-)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
From:John Bailey
Subject:Re: Neato chaotic equations for analog computers to display?
Date:Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:24:33 GMT
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:56:47 +0000, John Woodgate
wrote:

>I read in sci.electronics.design that John Bailey
> wrote (in <41c961e9.30717838@news-
>server.rochester.rr.com>) about 'Neato chaotic equations for analog
>computers to display?', on Wed, 22 Dec 2004:
>>There was a useful thread on sci.fractals in 1997
>
>Are all the threads on that group infinitely long? (;-)

ROTFL!
At least many of the URL's are. Your browser actually added the
ellipses.

In the interest of brevity, I have put a redirection script at:
http://home.rochester.rr.com/jbxroads/interests/sci.fractals/3d_chaotic_ode.html


John Bailey
http://home.rochester.rr.com/jbxroads/mailto.html
From:Active8
Subject:Re: Neato chaotic equations for analog computers to display?
Date:Thu, 23 Dec 2004 14:32:32 -0500
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:24:33 GMT, John Bailey wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:56:47 +0000, John Woodgate
> wrote:
>
>>I read in sci.electronics.design that John Bailey
>> wrote (in <41c961e9.30717838@news-
>>server.rochester.rr.com>) about 'Neato chaotic equations for analog
>>computers to display?', on Wed, 22 Dec 2004:
>>>There was a useful thread on sci.fractals in 1997
>>
>>Are all the threads on that group infinitely long? (;-)
>
> ROTFL!
> At least many of the URL's are. Your browser actually added the
> ellipses.
>
> In the interest of brevity, I have put a redirection script at:
> http://home.rochester.rr.com/jbxroads/interests/sci.fractals/3d_chaotic_ode.html
>
> John Bailey
> http://home.rochester.rr.com/jbxroads/mailto.html

Try tinyurl.com

--
Best Regards,
Mike
From:Charlie Gibbs
Subject:Re: Neato chaotic equations for analog computers to display?
Date:22 Dec 04 08:48:39 -0800
In article ,
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk (John Woodgate) writes:

> I read in sci.electronics.design that John Bailey
> wrote
> (in <41c961e9.30717838@news-server.rochester.rr.com>)
> about 'Neato chaotic equations for analog
> computers to display?', on Wed, 22 Dec 2004:
>
>> There was a useful thread on sci.fractals in 1997
>
> Are all the threads on that group infinitely long? (;-)

Not yet. :-)

--
/~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs)
\ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855.
/ \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
From:jmfbahciv at aol.com
Subject:Re: Neato chaotic equations for analog computers to display?
Date:Thu, 23 Dec 04 10:57:24 GMT
In article <718.852T1963T5285600@kltpzyxm.invalid>,
"Charlie Gibbs" wrote:
>In article ,
>jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk (John Woodgate) writes:
>
>> I read in sci.electronics.design that John Bailey
>> wrote
>> (in <41c961e9.30717838@news-server.rochester.rr.com>)
>> about 'Neato chaotic equations for analog
>> computers to display?', on Wed, 22 Dec 2004:
>>
>>> There was a useful thread on sci.fractals in 1997
>>
>> Are all the threads on that group infinitely long? (;-)
>
>Not yet. :-)
>
Do they repeat themselves?

/BAH

Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.
   

Copyright © 2006 knowledge-database   -   All rights reserved