IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a New Theory of Motion.
It includes SR as a subset. Its equations are valid in all
environments....including gravity.

The following is a description of IRT:
The postulates:
1) The laws of physics based on a clock second and light path
length of a measuring rod are the same for all observers in
all inertial reference frames.
2) The speed of light in free space based on a clock second
and the light path length of a measuring rod has the same
mathematical ratio c in all directions and all inertial frames.
3) The laws of physics based on a defined absolute second
and the physical length of a rod is different in different frames
of reference.
4) The one-way speed of light in free space based on a defined absolute
second and the physical length of a measuring rod has a different
mathematical ratio for light speed in different inertial frames. The
speed of light based on a defined absolute second and the physical
length of a measuring rod is maximum in the rest frame of the aether.

The Consequences of these Postulates:
(1). The speed of light is not a universal constant. It is a constant math
ratio as follows:
Light path length of rod (299,792,458 m)/the absolute time content for a
clock second co-moving with the rod.
Detailed explannation of this new definition:
By definition the speed of light in the rest frame of the ether is as
follows:
Light path length in the ether frame=gamma*299,792,458m. This is reduced
to--
(299,792,458m)-- because gamma is equal to one in the ether frame.
The absolute time content for a clock second in the ether frame=gamma*1
ether frame clock second. This is reduced to__ (1 ether frame clock
second)__ because gamma is equal to one in the ether frame.
Therefore the speed of light in the ether frame is:
299,792,458m/1 ether frame clock second
The speed of light in any frame moving in the stationary ether is determined
as follows:
The light path length of rod in the moving frame=gamma*299,792,458m
The absolute itme content for a moving clock second
=gamma*1 ether frame clock second
Therefore the speed of light in any moving frame in the stationary ether is
as follows:
gamma*299,792,458m/gamma*1 ether frame clock second.
This is reduce to a constant math ratio of:: 299,792,458m/1 ether frame
clock second

(2). The physical length of a rod remains the same in all frames of
reference. The light path length of a rod changes with the state of absolute
motion of the rod. The higher is the state of absolute motion the longer is
its light path length.
(3). The rate of a clock is dependent on the state of absolute motion of the
clock. The higher is the state of absolute motion the slower is its clock
rate.
(4). Absolute time exists. The relationship between clock time and absolute
time is as follows: A clock second will contain a different amount of
absolute time in different state of absolute motion (different frames of
reference). The higher is the state of absolute motion of the clock the
higher is the absolute time content for a clock second.
(5) Simultaneity is absolute. If two events are simultaneous in one frame,
identical events will also be simultaneous in different frames. However the
time interval for the simultaneity to occur will be different in different
frame. This is due to that different frames are in different states of
absolute motion.
(6) Relative motion between two observers A and B is the vector difference
of the vector component of A's absolute motions and the vector component of
B's absolute motion along the line joining A and B.

C. The Math:

1. The time dilation (contraction) or expansion equations:
A and B are in relative motion from observer A's point of view:

Tab=Taa(Faa/Fab) OR Tab=Taa(Fab/Faa)

Taa=A clock time interval in observer A's frame
as measured by A
Tab= A's prediction of B's clock time interval for
an interval of Taa in his frame
Note: Even though Taa and Tab are two different clock time
intervals but in terms of absolute time content Taa=Tab

The light path length contraction or expansion equations for a physical rod:
Lab=Laa(Faa/Fab) OR Lab=Laa(Fab/Faa)

Laa=the light path length of a rod in A's frame as
measured by A.
Lab=the light path length of an identical rod in B's
frame as predicted by A
Note: Even though Laa and Lab are two different light
path lengths but these two light path lengths are
derived from identical rod that have the same
physical rod length. The different light path lengths
are the result of different states of absolute motion
of the rods.

2. The coordinate transform equations:
x'= Faa/Fab[x + t(Faa-Fab)(lambda)]
t'= Faa/Fab[t + x(Faa-Fab)/(Faa^2)(lambda)]
y'=y
z'=z

OR

x'= Fab/Faa[x - t(Faa-Fab)(lambda)]
t'= Fab/Faa[t - x(Faa-Fab)/(Faa^2)(lambda)]
y'=y
z'=z

A is the observer's frame (unprimed) and B is the observed frame (primed).
Faa = frequency of a standard light source in A's frame as measured by A.
Fab = frequency of an identical light source in B's frame as measured by A.
If Fab is not constant the mean value is used.
lambda = wave length of the standard light source in A's frame as measured
by A.

These coordinate transform equations are valid in all
environments ---including gravity. This means that
IRT includes SR/GR as subsets

3. Momentum of an object:
p=Mo(lambda)(Faa-Fab)

4. Kinetic Energy of an object::
K=Mo(Lambda)^2(Faa)^2(Faa/Fab-1)

5. Energy of a single particle:
E=Mo(Lambda)^2(Faa)^2

6. Gravtational Red or Blue Shift:
Delta (Faa) =Faa(1-Fab/Faa)
A positve value represents a red shift from A's location.
A negative value represents a blue shift from A's location

7. Gravitational Time Contraction or Expansion:
Delta(Taa)=Taa(1-Fab/Faa)
A positive value represents gravitational time contraction (dilation)
from A's location.
A negative value represents gravitational time expansion
from A's location.

8. The IRT procedure for determining the perihelion precession of
Mercury without recourse to GRT is:
a) Set up a corrdinate system for the Sun and Mervury.
b) Use the IRT Corrdinate tansformation equations to predict the
future positions of the Sun and Mercury.
c) The perihelion shift of Mercury will be revealed when these
future positions are plotted against time. Also, the value of the
shift can be determined from the plot.

Summarizing:
IRT is a complete theory of motion. It contains SR as a subset.
It's equations are valid in all environments. In addition it resolves the
following observed difficulties of GR:
1. GR predicts that the expansion of the universe should be slowing down.
Actual observations show that the expansion is speeding up. IRT have no
such problem. It predicts what is observed.
2. GR gives the wrong prediction for the path of the space craft Pioneer 10.
IRT has no such problem. It predicts that the space craft is accelerating
toward the Sun because of a concentration of dark matter contained
within the solar system---especially around the Sun.
3. GR gives the wrong rotational curve for galaxies. Again IRT has no
such problem because IRT includes the effects of dark matter in its
calculations.

Ken Seto

From:	robert j. kolker
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:02:34 -0500

kenseto wrote:

> IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a New Theory of Motion.
> It includes SR as a subset. Its equations are valid in all
> environments....including gravity.

Using your theory, account for the anomalous precession of the
perihelion of Mercury. Please show all work and do not leave anything out.

Bob Kolker

From:	kenseto
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:09:28 GMT

"robert j. kolker" wrote in message
news:35hskdF2uvkpdU2@individual.net...
>
>
> kenseto wrote:
>
> > IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a New Theory of Motion.
> > It includes SR as a subset. Its equations are valid in all
> > environments....including gravity.
>
> Using your theory, account for the anomalous precession of the
> perihelion of Mercury. Please show all work and do not leave anything out.

Hey idiot read the IRT procedure to determine the precession of the
perihelion of Mercury.

Ken Seto

From:	robert j. kolker
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:20:34 -0500

kenseto wrote:
>
> Hey idiot read the IRT procedure to determine the precession of the
> perihelion of Mercury.

I have no wish to read all of your opus. Please outline the mathematical
analysis which correctly predicts the anomalous precession of the
perihelion of mercury.

Or at least indicate on what pages and which paragraphs therein produce
this prediction complete with all calculations fully worked out. This I
have to see. You would not know a tensor bundle if it bit you in the
arse, so I really have to know how you worked this out with 9-th grade
mathematics.

Bob Kolker

From:	kenseto
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:41:01 GMT

"robert j. kolker" wrote in message
news:35htm6F4l7nc8U1@individual.net...
>
>
> kenseto wrote:
> >
> > Hey idiot read the IRT procedure to determine the precession of the
> > perihelion of Mercury.
>
> I have no wish to read all of your opus.

In that case fuck off.

>Please outline the mathematical
> analysis which correctly predicts the anomalous precession of the
> perihelion of mercury.

>
> Or at least indicate on what pages and which paragraphs therein produce
> this prediction complete with all calculations fully worked out. This I
> have to see. You would not know a tensor bundle if it bit you in the
> arse, so I really have to know how you worked this out with 9-th grade
> mathematics.
>
> Bob Kolker
>

From:	Sam Wormley
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:02:29 GMT

kenseto wrote:

> Hey idiot read the IRT procedure to determine the precession of the
> perihelion of Mercury.
>

Seto has no theory, but he sure do have a lot of immortal fumbles!
http://www.google.com/search?q=seto+fumble+site%3Ausers.pandora.be

and he are a registered crank
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ken+H.+Seto%22+site%3Awww.crank.net

and nobody is interested in seto's crackpot ideas, as they lack any real
scientific basis.

From:	kenseto
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:12:40 GMT

"Sam Wormley" wrote in message
news:9xSId.24437$OF5.23449@attbi_s52...
> kenseto wrote:
>
>
> > Hey idiot read the IRT procedure to determine the precession of the
> > perihelion of Mercury.
> >

Wormy is a runt of the SR experts and a low-life (a worm??).
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their shit like
gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR.

Ken Seto

From:	Jesse Mazer
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:16:50 GMT

kenseto wrote:

>IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a New Theory of Motion.
>It includes SR as a subset. Its equations are valid in all
>environments....including gravity.
>
> The following is a description of IRT:
> The postulates:
> 1) The laws of physics based on a clock second and light path
> length of a measuring rod are the same for all observers in
> all inertial reference frames.
> 2) The speed of light in free space based on a clock second
> and the light path length of a measuring rod has the same
> mathematical ratio c in all directions and all inertial frames.
> 3) The laws of physics based on a defined absolute second
> and the physical length of a rod is different in different frames
> of reference.
> 4) The one-way speed of light in free space based on a defined absolute
> second and the physical length of a measuring rod has a different
> mathematical ratio for light speed in different inertial frames. The
> speed of light based on a defined absolute second and the physical
> length of a measuring rod is maximum in the rest frame of the aether.
>
> The Consequences of these Postulates:
>(1). The speed of light is not a universal constant. It is a constant math
> ratio as follows:
>Light path length of rod (299,792,458 m)/the absolute time content for a
> clock second co-moving with the rod.
>Detailed explannation of this new definition:
>By definition the speed of light in the rest frame of the ether is as
>follows:
>Light path length in the ether frame=gamma*299,792,458m. This is reduced
>to--
>(299,792,458m)-- because gamma is equal to one in the ether frame.
>The absolute time content for a clock second in the ether frame=gamma*1
>ether frame clock second. This is reduced to__ (1 ether frame clock
>second)__ because gamma is equal to one in the ether frame.
>Therefore the speed of light in the ether frame is:
> 299,792,458m/1 ether frame clock second
>The speed of light in any frame moving in the stationary ether is determined
>as follows:
>The light path length of rod in the moving frame=gamma*299,792,458m
>The absolute itme content for a moving clock second
>=gamma*1 ether frame clock second
>Therefore the speed of light in any moving frame in the stationary ether is
>as follows:
>gamma*299,792,458m/gamma*1 ether frame clock second.
>This is reduce to a constant math ratio of:: 299,792,458m/1 ether frame
>clock second
>
>(2). The physical length of a rod remains the same in all frames of
>reference. The light path length of a rod changes with the state of absolute
>motion of the rod. The higher is the state of absolute motion the longer is
>its light path length.
>(3). The rate of a clock is dependent on the state of absolute motion of the
>clock. The higher is the state of absolute motion the slower is its clock
> rate.
>
Are you saying that an observer at rest wrt the ether will see moving
clocks slow down, but he *won't* see moving rulers shrink, as measured
by his own coordinate system?

>(4). Absolute time exists. The relationship between clock time and absolute
>time is as follows: A clock second will contain a different amount of
>absolute time in different state of absolute motion (different frames of
>reference). The higher is the state of absolute motion of the clock the
>higher is the absolute time content for a clock second.
>(5) Simultaneity is absolute. If two events are simultaneous in one frame,
>identical events will also be simultaneous in different frames. However the
>time interval for the simultaneity to occur will be different in different
>frame. This is due to that different frames are in different states of
>absolute motion.
>

What method should observers in different frames use to synchronize
their clocks? If you are saying they all agree about simultaneity,
obviously they aren't synchronizing clocks by the standard method of
making sure that both clocks give the same time at the moment they are
struck by a light flash emitted at the midpoint of the line between them.

Jesse

From:	kenseto
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:43:14 GMT

"Jesse Mazer" wrote in message
news:41F4AEB8.8090007@mail.verizon.net...
>
>
> kenseto wrote:
>
> >IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a New Theory of Motion.
> >It includes SR as a subset. Its equations are valid in all
> >environments....including gravity.
> >
> > The following is a description of IRT:
> > The postulates:
> > 1) The laws of physics based on a clock second and light path
> > length of a measuring rod are the same for all observers in
> > all inertial reference frames.
> > 2) The speed of light in free space based on a clock second
> > and the light path length of a measuring rod has the same
> > mathematical ratio c in all directions and all inertial frames.
> > 3) The laws of physics based on a defined absolute second
> > and the physical length of a rod is different in different frames
> > of reference.
> > 4) The one-way speed of light in free space based on a defined absolute
> > second and the physical length of a measuring rod has a different
> > mathematical ratio for light speed in different inertial frames. The
> > speed of light based on a defined absolute second and the physical
> > length of a measuring rod is maximum in the rest frame of the aether.
> >
> > The Consequences of these Postulates:
> >(1). The speed of light is not a universal constant. It is a constant
math
> > ratio as follows:
> >Light path length of rod (299,792,458 m)/the absolute time content for a
> > clock second co-moving with the rod.
> >Detailed explannation of this new definition:
> >By definition the speed of light in the rest frame of the ether is as
> >follows:
> >Light path length in the ether frame=gamma*299,792,458m. This is reduced
> >to--
> >(299,792,458m)-- because gamma is equal to one in the ether frame.
> >The absolute time content for a clock second in the ether frame=gamma*1
> >ether frame clock second. This is reduced to__ (1 ether frame clock
> >second)__ because gamma is equal to one in the ether frame.
> >Therefore the speed of light in the ether frame is:
> > 299,792,458m/1 ether frame clock second
> >The speed of light in any frame moving in the stationary ether is
determined
> >as follows:
> >The light path length of rod in the moving frame=gamma*299,792,458m
> >The absolute itme content for a moving clock second
> >=gamma*1 ether frame clock second
> >Therefore the speed of light in any moving frame in the stationary ether
is
> >as follows:
> >gamma*299,792,458m/gamma*1 ether frame clock second.
> >This is reduce to a constant math ratio of:: 299,792,458m/1 ether frame
> >clock second
> >
> >(2). The physical length of a rod remains the same in all frames of
> >reference. The light path length of a rod changes with the state of
absolute
> >motion of the rod. The higher is the state of absolute motion the longer
is
> >its light path length.
> >(3). The rate of a clock is dependent on the state of absolute motion of
the
> >clock. The higher is the state of absolute motion the slower is its clock
> > rate.
> >
> Are you saying that an observer at rest wrt the ether will see moving
> clocks slow down, but he *won't* see moving rulers shrink, as measured
> by his own coordinate system?

Yes the physical length of a ruler remains the same in all frames including
the rest frame of the ether. However the light path length of a ruler is
dependent of the state of absolute motion of the ruler. The higher is the
state of absolute motion of a ruler the longer is its light path length. The
ruler at the rest frame of the ether has the shortest light path length.
>
>
>
> >(4). Absolute time exists. The relationship between clock time and
absolute
> >time is as follows: A clock second will contain a different amount of
> >absolute time in different state of absolute motion (different frames of
> >reference). The higher is the state of absolute motion of the clock the
> >higher is the absolute time content for a clock second.
> >(5) Simultaneity is absolute. If two events are simultaneous in one
frame,
> >identical events will also be simultaneous in different frames. However
the
> >time interval for the simultaneity to occur will be different in
different
> >frame. This is due to that different frames are in different states of
> >absolute motion.
> >
>
> What method should observers in different frames use to synchronize
> their clocks?

Even in SR you can't synchronize two relatively moving clocks.

>If you are saying they all agree about simultaneity,

They all agree about simultaneity but different observer will see
simultaneity occur at different time. The observer at a higher state of
absolute motion will see simultaneity to occur at a later time (ie: it take
a larger amount of absolute time for him to see the simultaneity).

> obviously they aren't synchronizing clocks by the standard method of
> making sure that both clocks give the same time at the moment they are
> struck by a light flash emitted at the midpoint of the line between them.

In Einstein's train gedanken:
The track observer will see the events to be simultaneous at time L/c.
The train observer will see the events to be simultaneous at a later time of
gamma*L/c

Ken Seto

From:	Bernardz
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:29:04 +1100

In article <_NOId.6675$VZ2.5986@fe1.columbus.rr.com>, kenseto@erinet.com
says...
> IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a New Theory of Motion.
> It includes SR as a subset. Its equations are valid in all
> environments....including gravity.
>
> The following is a description of IRT:
> The postulates:
> 1) The laws of physics based on a clock second and light path
> length of a measuring rod are the same for all observers in
> all inertial reference frames.
> 2) The speed of light in free space based on a clock second
> and the light path length of a measuring rod has the same
> mathematical ratio c in all directions and all inertial frames.
> 3) The laws of physics based on a defined absolute second
> and the physical length of a rod is different in different frames
> of reference.
> 4) The one-way speed of light in free space based on a defined absolute
> second and the physical length of a measuring rod has a different
> mathematical ratio for light speed in different inertial frames. The
> speed of light based on a defined absolute second and the physical
> length of a measuring rod is maximum in the rest frame of the aether.
>

The concept of absolute time does not exist in SR by adding it and
creating IRT. IST becomes either a different set to SR or a subset to
SR.

--
The world is not fair.

Observations of Bernard - No 70

From:	Paul Stowe
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:37:51 GMT

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:29:04 +1100, Bernardz
wrote:

>In article <_NOId.6675$VZ2.5986@fe1.columbus.rr.com>, kenseto@erinet.com
>says...
>> IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a New Theory of Motion.
>> It includes SR as a subset. Its equations are valid in all
>> environments....including gravity.
>>
>> The following is a description of IRT:
>> The postulates:
>> 1) The laws of physics based on a clock second and light
>> path length of a measuring rod are the same for all
>> observers in all inertial reference frames.
>> 2) The speed of light in free space based on a clock
>> second and the light path length of a measuring rod
>> has the same mathematical ratio c in all directions
>> and all inertial frames.
>> 3) The laws of physics based on a defined absolute
>> second and the physical length of a rod is different
>> in different frames of reference.
>> 4) The one-way speed of light in free space based on a
>> defined absolute second and the physical length of a
>> measuring rod has a different mathematical ratio for
>> light speed in different inertial frames. The speed of
>> light based on a defined absolute second and the
>> physical length of a measuring rod is maximum in the
>> rest frame of the aether.
>
> The concept of absolute time does not exist in SR ...

Actually it implicit in the 'arrow of time'. While
perception of time can be 'relative' the actual ordering of
events (cause cannot precede effect) is tantamount to an
absolute ordering (sequence, a.k.a., Time).

> ... by adding it and creating IRT. IST becomes either a
> different set to SR or a subset to SR.

While a most certainly do not agree with Ken this is
explicitly true of his ideas.

Paul Stowe

From:	Bernardz
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:42:36 +1100

In article ,
ps@acompletelyjunkaddress.net says...
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:29:04 +1100, Bernardz
> wrote:
>
> >In article <_NOId.6675$VZ2.5986@fe1.columbus.rr.com>, kenseto@erinet.com
> >says...
> >> IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a New Theory of Motion.
> >> It includes SR as a subset. Its equations are valid in all
> >> environments....including gravity.
> >>
> >> The following is a description of IRT:
> >> The postulates:
> >> 1) The laws of physics based on a clock second and light
> >> path length of a measuring rod are the same for all
> >> observers in all inertial reference frames.
> >> 2) The speed of light in free space based on a clock
> >> second and the light path length of a measuring rod
> >> has the same mathematical ratio c in all directions
> >> and all inertial frames.
> >> 3) The laws of physics based on a defined absolute
> >> second and the physical length of a rod is different
> >> in different frames of reference.
> >> 4) The one-way speed of light in free space based on a
> >> defined absolute second and the physical length of a
> >> measuring rod has a different mathematical ratio for
> >> light speed in different inertial frames. The speed of
> >> light based on a defined absolute second and the
> >> physical length of a measuring rod is maximum in the
> >> rest frame of the aether.
> >
> > The concept of absolute time does not exist in SR ...
>
> Actually it implicit in the 'arrow of time'. While
> perception of time can be 'relative' the actual ordering of
> events (cause cannot precede effect) is tantamount to an
> absolute ordering (sequence, a.k.a., Time).

If this is what he means by absolute time, then in this he is right.

>
> > ... by adding it and creating IRT. IST becomes either a
> > different set to SR or a subset to SR.
>
> While a most certainly do not agree with Ken this is
> explicitly true of his ideas.
>
> Paul Stowe
>

--
The world is not fair.

Observations of Bernard - No 70

From:	kenseto
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:05:38 GMT

"Bernardz" wrote in message
news:MPG.1c5ea60aad35ad3a989beb@news...
> In article <_NOId.6675$VZ2.5986@fe1.columbus.rr.com>, kenseto@erinet.com
> says...
> > IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a New Theory of Motion.
> > It includes SR as a subset. Its equations are valid in all
> > environments....including gravity.
> >
> > The following is a description of IRT:
> > The postulates:
> > 1) The laws of physics based on a clock second and light path
> > length of a measuring rod are the same for all observers in
> > all inertial reference frames.
> > 2) The speed of light in free space based on a clock second
> > and the light path length of a measuring rod has the same
> > mathematical ratio c in all directions and all inertial frames.
> > 3) The laws of physics based on a defined absolute second
> > and the physical length of a rod is different in different frames
> > of reference.
> > 4) The one-way speed of light in free space based on a defined absolute
> > second and the physical length of a measuring rod has a different
> > mathematical ratio for light speed in different inertial frames. The
> > speed of light based on a defined absolute second and the physical
> > length of a measuring rod is maximum in the rest frame of the aether.
> >
>
> The concept of absolute time does not exist in SR

You are wrong. SR implies that absolute time exists. The purpose of the SR
math is to predict the clock time value in the observed frame for an
interval of absolute time in the observer's frame. The GPS uses absolute
time to synchronize the satellite clocks with the ground clocks. They
redefined the satellite clock second to have 4.15 more ticks of the Cs atom.
This redfined satellite second has the same absolute time content as the
ground clock second which uses the standard definition and which has 4.15
fewer ticks than the satellite clock second.

by adding it and
> creating IRT. IST becomes either a different set to SR or a subset to
> SR.

ROTFLOL.....SR is an incomplete ether theory. It is a subset of IRT and IRT
is a complete theory of motion. It equations are valid in all
environments....including gravity.

Ken Seto

From:	Uncle Al
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:51:25 -0800

kenseto wrote:
>
> IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a New Theory of Motion.
> It includes SR as a subset. Its equations are valid in all
> environments....including gravity.
>
> The following is a description of IRT:
> The postulates:
> 1) The laws of physics based on a clock second and light path
> length of a measuring rod are the same for all observers in
> all inertial reference frames.
[snip crap]

Ineducable boring idiot.

Annalen der Physik 4, XVII 891-921 (1905)
Annalen der Physik 4, XLIX 769-822 (1916)

Mathematics of gravitation

http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039

Experimental constraints on General Relativity

Nature 425 374 (2003)
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf

Relativity in the GPS system

Hafele-Keating Experiment

Science 303(5661) 1143;1153 (2004)
http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401086
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071

Deeply relativistic neutron star binaries

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0301024
Nordtvedt Effect

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0306076.pdf

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/default.htm
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/icd200/default.htm
http://www.trimble.com/gps/index.html
http://sirius.chinalake.navy.mil/satpred/
http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog/mog9/node9.html
http://egtphysics.net/GPS/RelGPS.htm
http://www.schriever.af.mil/gps/Current/current.oa1
http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html

More GPS

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

From:	kenseto
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:11:10 GMT

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
news:41F41C5D.5CE1314B@hate.spam.net...
> kenseto wrote:
> >
> > IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a New Theory of Motion.
> > It includes SR as a subset. Its equations are valid in all
> > environments....including gravity.
> >
> > The following is a description of IRT:
> > The postulates:
> > 1) The laws of physics based on a clock second and light path
> > length of a measuring rod are the same for all observers in
> > all inertial reference frames.
> [snip crap]
>
> Ineducable boring idiot.

Uncle Al is a runt of the SR experts and a low-life.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their shit like
gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR.

Ken Seto

From:	bryant_j_j at yahoo.com
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	24 Jan 2005 02:33:22 -0800

kenseto wrote:
> wrote in message

> > hi Ken, can you tell us if you have had some sort of higher
academic
> > training in physics (e.g. a bachelor's, master's )? or is it true
you
> > are only using 9-th grade maths for your work?
> >
> Fucking idiot runt of the SRians..
hey that was unwarranted, i asked nicely.

From:	bryant_j_j at yahoo.com
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	23 Jan 2005 15:57:31 -0800

kenseto wrote:
>
> Wormy is a runt of the SR experts and a low-life (a worm??).
> Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
> A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
> know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
> beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
> the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their shit like
> gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who
> disagrees with SR.
>
> Ken Seto

hi Ken, can you tell us if you have had some sort of higher academic
training in physics (e.g. a bachelor's, master's )? or is it true you
are only using 9-th grade maths for your work?

From:	kenseto
Subject:	Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:10:04 GMT

wrote in message
news:1106524650.970738.81240@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
> kenseto wrote:
> >
> > Wormy is a runt of the SR experts and a low-life (a worm??).
> > Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
> > A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
> > know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
> > beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
> > the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their shit like
> > gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who
> > disagrees with SR.
> >
> > Ken Seto
>
> hi Ken, can you tell us if you have had some sort of higher academic
> training in physics (e.g. a bachelor's, master's )? or is it true you
> are only using 9-th grade maths for your work?
>
Fucking idiot runt of the SRians..