|
|
 | | From: | Ken S. Tucker | | Subject: | Re: neutrinos redshift? | | Date: | 23 Jan 2005 11:14:00 -0800 |
|
|
 |
Sam Wormley wrote:
> John Sefton wrote:
> > Do neutrinos redshift or blueshift
> > depending on their source?
> > Or can we not yet know them that well?
> > John
> >
>
> All particles have wavelike properties.
Sure they do Sam, but the 1987SNa supernova event
set off the detectors, as I think you will recall.
Let's imagine the cauldron of the SN1987 supernova,
we should expect neutrino's emitted from sources
therein, moving away and toward the detector, unless
the damn thing popped in micro-seconds. That's
what I call an interesting question.
Ken
|
|
| | From: | Sam Wormley | | Subject: | Re: neutrinos redshift? | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:39:08 GMT |
|
|
| Ken S. Tucker wrote:
> Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>>John Sefton wrote:
>>
>>>Do neutrinos redshift or blueshift
>>>depending on their source?
>>>Or can we not yet know them that well?
>>>John
>>>
>>
>> All particles have wavelike properties.
>
>
> Sure they do Sam, but the 1987SNa supernova event
> set off the detectors, as I think you will recall.
>
> Let's imagine the cauldron of the SN1987 supernova,
> we should expect neutrino's emitted from sources
> therein, moving away and toward the detector, unless
> the damn thing popped in micro-seconds. That's
> what I call an interesting question.
>
> Ken
>
What do you mean, "unless the damn thing popped in micro-seconds"?
Models of core collapse indicates that the collapse take place in
less than a millisecond.
|
|
| | From: | Franz Heymann | | Subject: | Re: neutrinos redshift? | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:43:48 +0000 (UTC) |
|
|
|
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message
news:1106507640.780962.27170@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Sam Wormley wrote:
> > John Sefton wrote:
> > > Do neutrinos redshift or blueshift
> > > depending on their source?
> > > Or can we not yet know them that well?
> > > John
> > >
> >
> > All particles have wavelike properties.
>
> Sure they do Sam, but the 1987SNa supernova event
> set off the detectors, as I think you will recall.
>
> Let's imagine the cauldron of the SN1987 supernova,
> we should expect neutrino's emitted from sources
> therein, moving away and toward the detector, unless
> the damn thing popped in micro-seconds. That's
> what I call an interesting question.
Where is this question of which you speak?
What is the relevance of your note to the question of the existence of
the wavelike properties of neutrinos?
Franz
|
|
|
