|
|
 | | From: | Convicted Criminal: Edmond Wollmann | | Subject: | Wollmann. WikiPedia. Vote AGAINST Deletion was Re: Has Edmond Wollmann | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:34:33 -0800 |
|
|
 | Howard Goldstein wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:12:35 -0800, Bob Officer wrote:
> : On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:59:22 GMT, in alt.astrology, hgoldste@mpcs.com
> : (Howard Goldstein) wrote:
> :
> : >On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:45:38 -0800, Convicted Criminal Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> : > : The One Who Rules wrote:
> : > : > You are not too bright are you? Learn what a sock puppet is. YOU and
> : > : > your harassing troll friends ARE sock-puppets. A sock puppet is NOT an
> : > : > identifyable person simply posting from different screen-names.
> : > : >
> : > : > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sock_puppet
> : > :
> : > : Oh, so you like wiki, eh? What do you think of the page they have on
> : > : YOU, asshole?
> : >
> : >Which may soon go away, there's vote for deletion interested folks
> : >might participate in. See
> : >
> :
> : I don't see enough reason for deletion. However Edmond is notable for being
> : the person and activities which typified the sock puppet abuser.
>
> Thus far it seems deletion is purely vote based and therefore can be
> very arbitrary and capricious.
>
> If one were to go by the published precedent for wiki deletions (I
> don't have the wiki page handy but the precedent page is somewhere off
> of the VfD page), since the VfD turns on notability, there is
> precedent of non-deletability for a person whose only accomplishments
> were climbing a mountain in a skirt, writing a book, having 5 google
> hits, and dying.
>
>
>
So be sure and vote, everybody!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Edmond_Wollmann
|
|
|
