|
|
 | | From: | Lensman | | Subject: | Re: Hunting is banned! | | Date: | Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:20:47 +0000 (UTC) |
|
|
 | Rooney wrote :
>On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:56:19 +0000 (UTC), Lensman
>wrote:
>
>>Just because I dont like it, doesn't give me the right to prevent others
>>from doing it by some instrument of state.
>
>Er, it does if you're a majority.
>They just can't get their heads around the idea of democracy, these
>people.
I like the way you snipped that and tried to lump me in with the pro
hunt nutters, but it didn't work.
I'll reiterate :
>>So you really don't believe that there are people who don't hunt but
>>who also don't think the hunting ban is a good idea?
>
>No one can be that stupid.
I neither hunt, nor support the ban, nor care very much about foxes.
But I also find hunting (for foxes, with packs of hounds) to be a vile
pursuit, pursued by the vile.
Just because I dont like it, doesn't give me the right to prevent others
from doing it by some instrument of state. If you don't like hunting, try
sabotaging, its at least as bloodthirsty, but you get to go home with a
clear conscience.
See, when you write it down like that it's quite hard to lump me in with
"these people"
I'm guessing you're a duck squeezer, since you evidently have problems with
things like facts and truth, and prefer instead to rely on propoganda and
manipulating the emotions of the weak, a bit like the Nazis.
--
/------------------------------------------------------------\
| GCHQ - we know what you did last summer |
\------------------------------------------------------------/
|
|
| | From: | Steve Terry | | Subject: | Re: Hunting is banned! | | Date: | Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:36:16 +0000 |
|
|
| On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:20:47 +0000 (UTC), Lensman
wrote:
>Rooney wrote :
>
>>On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:56:19 +0000 (UTC), Lensman
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Just because I dont like it, doesn't give me the right to prevent others
>>>from doing it by some instrument of state.
>>
>>Er, it does if you're a majority.
>>They just can't get their heads around the idea of democracy, these
>>people.
>
>
>I like the way you snipped that and tried to lump me in with the pro
>hunt nutters, but it didn't work.
>
Ewe are conphewsed.
>I'll reiterate :
>
>>>So you really don't believe that there are people who don't hunt but
>>>who also don't think the hunting ban is a good idea?
>>
>>No one can be that stupid.
>
>I neither hunt, nor support the ban, nor care very much about foxes.
>But I also find hunting (for foxes, with packs of hounds) to be a vile
>pursuit, pursued by the vile.
Still conphewsed.
>
>Just because I dont like it, doesn't give me the right to prevent others
>from doing it by some instrument of state. If you don't like hunting, try
>sabotaging, its at least as bloodthirsty, but you get to go home with a
>clear conscience.
>
>See, when you write it down like that it's quite hard to lump me in with
>"these people"
>
>I'm guessing you're a duck squeezer, since you evidently have problems with
>things like facts and truth, and prefer instead to rely on propoganda and
>manipulating the emotions of the weak, a bit like the Nazis.
Sieg Heil.
--
Cheerio,
SUPPORT ISRAEL
Myths & Facts Online
A Guide to the Arab-Israeli Conflict
By Mitchell G. Bard
http://tinyurl.com/ysepr
+------------------------+
| NO PLONKING ZONE |
+------------------------+
| | |
| | | |
..| |.. .| |..
...\| |/.... \| |/..
**********************************************
'You can't win 'em all.'
Lord Haw Haw.
Since I stopped donating money to CONservation hooligan charities
Like the RSPB, Woodland Trust and all the other fat cat charities
I am in the top 0.217% richest people in the world.
There are 5,986,950,449 people poorer than me
If you're really interested I am the 13,049,551
richest person in the world.
And I'm keeping the bloody lot.
So sue me.
http://www.globalrichlist.com/
Newsgroup ettiquette
1) Tell everyone the Trolls don't bother you.
2) Say you've killfiled them, yet continue to respond.
3) Tell other people off who repsond despite doing so yourself.
4) Continually talk about Trolls while maintaining
they're having no effect.
5) Publicly post killfile rules so the Trolls know
how to avoid them.
6) Make lame legal threats and other barrel scraping
manoeuvres when your abuse reports are ignored.
7) Eat vast quantities of pies.
8) Forget to brush your teeth for several decades.
9) Help a demon.local poster with their email while
secretly reading it.
10) Pretend you're a hard bastard when in fact you're
as bent as a roundabout.
11) Become the laughing stock of Usenet like Mabbet
12) Die of old age
13) Keep paying Dr Chartham his fees and hope one day you
will have a penis the girls can see.
|
|
| | From: | Rooney | | Subject: | Re: Hunting is banned! | | Date: | Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:33:01 +0000 |
|
|
| On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:20:47 +0000 (UTC), Lensman
wrote:
>Rooney wrote :
>
>>On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:56:19 +0000 (UTC), Lensman
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Just because I dont like it, doesn't give me the right to prevent others
>>>from doing it by some instrument of state.
>>
>>Er, it does if you're a majority.
>>They just can't get their heads around the idea of democracy, these
>>people.
>
>
>I like the way you snipped that and tried to lump me in with the pro
>hunt nutters, but it didn't work.
I wasn't intentionally putting you in with any group.
Don't, please, do an Oz on me. I'm just pointing out what democracy
is.
>I'll reiterate :
>
>>>So you really don't believe that there are people who don't hunt but
>>>who also don't think the hunting ban is a good idea?
>>
>>No one can be that stupid.
>
>I neither hunt, nor support the ban, nor care very much about foxes.
>But I also find hunting (for foxes, with packs of hounds) to be a vile
>pursuit, pursued by the vile.
And I find the hunt a magnificent sight, particularly in the winter
landscape, but I've no intention of joining them. My post was about
democracy, not hunting. And indirectly it was about hunters' attitudes
to democracy.
>Just because I dont like it, doesn't give me the right to prevent others
>from doing it by some instrument of state. If you don't like hunting, try
>sabotaging, its at least as bloodthirsty, but you get to go home with a
>clear conscience.
>
>See, when you write it down like that it's quite hard to lump me in with
>"these people"
Point taken.
>I'm guessing you're a duck squeezer, since you evidently have problems with
>things like facts and truth, and prefer instead to rely on propoganda and
>manipulating the emotions of the weak, a bit like the Nazis.
What's a duck squeezer? Is that like a tree hugger?
My view on ducks is that they are quite tasty.
My view on foxes is that they are by no means tasty, though nice to
look at. But I'd have no hesitation in shooting one if it ate my
chickens (if I had any - I don't), and I'd do it quite legally, urban
area or not.
--
R
o
o
n
e
y
|
|
|
