| knowledge-database (beta) |
 |
Current group: scot.politics
On Anarchist Christians, Anarchist Communists, Anti-propertyists and Freemasons.
| Lucifer - Judge of Judgement Day | | Robert Peffers | | Paul Hyett |
|
|
 | | From: | Lucifer - Judge of Judgement Day | | Subject: | On Anarchist Christians, Anarchist Communists, Anti-propertyists and Freemasons. | | Date: | 23 Jan 2005 04:30:51 -0800 |
|
|
 | On Anarchist Christians, Anarchist Communists, anti-Propertyists and Freemasons.
By Lucifer www.luciferia.tv In London. For Anarchist Communism. The 1000 Year Agricultural Revolution. For the Global Holocaust of all Christians. For Apocalyptic Guerilla War against the Financial Capitals of the First World. ___________________
January 2005.
To my Seven billion brothers and sisters.
On Practical (Actual) Christianity.
Christianity, like all religion is an evil religion. In Iraq, the Christian armies have already killed 100,000 people, and when Saddam was an Anglo American collaborator he tortured and murdered 100,000 Iraqi Communists, he invaded Iran, dropped poison gas on the Kurds and was responsible for the deaths of millions, all as an Anglo American ally; if Saddam had not been evil, the Christians would never have considered him an ally.
The Christian, Anglo-American, narco-terrorist military in Iraq are today assisted by professional (paid in Capitalist coin) chaplains (the priesthood), and whose President and Prime Minister were elected as Christians, by Christians. The rape, torture and murder of Iraqis is no accident; the Christian military are trained in the art of torture and ual molestation; this is wilful and premeditated. The history of the American Christian narco-terrorists in Latin America for example is a history of rape, torture, murder and CIA backed military coups. Many of their official training manuals can be read on the internet. Perhaps one of the most interesting is the training manual for the Nicaraguan anti-Communist narco-terrorists who were fighting the pro-Castro Sandinistas; their strategy was simple; kidnap and execute government officials; terrorise and murder the judiciary, police; create chaos. The CIA have admitted that they armed these narco-terrorists and traded narcotics with them, however the American Christians apparently believe that rape, torture, murder and narco-terrorism can be justified in the name of Jesus. Today there are Nicaraguan soldiers fighting alongside the Anglo-American-Zionist narco-terrorists in Iraq. That is practical Christianity.
As one looks back in history, Christianity has always been an evil religion, just as it is today. Christianity today exists as a justification for usury, narco-terrorism, private propertyism, temple worship, consumerism, etc. In London this week for example, one of the City's multi-millionaire Catholic bankers who worked for a Masonic financial institution was murdered, and the media described this parasite as a pious Christian. 20,000 children die each day due to Usuryist imposed poverty. That is practical Christianity; starve the children of the world, enslave them, lend their corrupt governmentalists money at interest and if they rebel against you, define them as terrorists, recruit young unemployed football hooligans as useful idiots, train them to torture, rape and murder and send them out to kill your enemies. That is practical Christianity.
Some Anarchists may argue 'Oh but Jesus was an 'anti-propertyist,' and an 'anti-religionist' who took the side of the oppressed against the rich and the religious, and cursed them all to hell, but that has nothing to do with practical Christianity, that is Anarchism (Anarchos; contrary to authority: a society without private property or government). Christians may argue 'Oh but we do not believe in anti-propertyism; anti-propertyism would not help us become more rich' and yet on the other hand they worship an anti-propertyist as the Creator (i.e., idolatry; an executable offence), eat his flesh, drink his blood, construct idols to him, build temples to him with a professional priesthood of Capitalists and worship him as the god of the rich and the religious; that is the evil of the Christians and they have nothing to do with anti-propertyism. When a Christian says 'I do not believe in anti-propertyism' they deny Christ, but these evil hypocrites will never the less still claim to be Christians and the rape, torture and murder of innocents by the Christian armies will continue and half the world will continue to be malnourished and most of the world will continue to be the usury victims and the labour slaves of the rich Christians.
Jesus and Anarchism. Property is Theft.
Some Anarchists are very anti-Jesus, and I find this quite disturbing, since if one considers the history of anti-propertyists and anti-religionists, Jesus is clearly an eminent anti-propertyist saint and martyr. Jesus was not Proudhon, Bakunin, or Kropotkin. Jesus did not live in 19th century Europe, and he left us no writings written by his own hand, rather we only have various Chinese whispers of him, and there are some who will argue that we cannot even be sure of his existence; but as a political thinker, what is clear from what has been written of him is that he stands out clearly as an anti-propertyist.
The cultists of Solomon's Temple.
Jesus' father was allegedly Zechariah the high priest of the Solomonic Temple cult whose priesthood eventually issued a large reward for his capture. His contemporary enemies were cultists of his father's own religion, just as the enemies of the anti-propertyist Kropotkin, who was an aristocrat, were the aristocracy. One has to judge Jesus in the context of his first century social environment; he was not a 19th century anti-propertyist living in Russia, nor a 21st century anti-propertyist living in London. Today the cult of Solomon's Temple still exists. In London, near the Covent Garden Piazza, stands perhaps the most impressive piece of architecture in all of London, and this is the Temple of my father's religious cult. The inner sanctum of this Temple is a deliberate architectural copy of Solomon's Temple. The religious cult's (cult: to kill; they are a military order of ritualists / mystery cultists who are sworn to eternal obedience to their king) lawyers who argued for the tax exempt status of the building described it as a 'Temple of Religion' and that is exactly what it is. As an anti-propertyist, anti-religionist son of one these religious cultists, it is unsurprising to me that another son of these cultists 2000 years ago, cursed them, raged against them, threatened them with eternal judgement and sought to raise revolution against them. It is not unsurprising that they eventually sought his execution. My father is both a Christian 'and' a Masonic cultist, and as far as I am concerned it is the same ancient and evil religion.
Final War, Judgement (Judah Mentis: the mind of Judah) Day and the 1000 Year Agricultural Revolution.
The Day of Judgement and the Final Holocaust of the idolaters is about the global Holocaust of all religionists, 'especially' the Solomonic cultists and Christians. That is what I believe and what I propagate; that is my Judgement and long have I cried out for world revolution against these vermin and I have perfect faith that this will come about whether I live or die, and that the children of the future will carry this out.
There are seven billion people here. Half are malnourished. This injustice is not caused by a 'system,' but by persons. There is no 'Capitalist system;' there are only Capitalists and Capitalists are people, not buildings or inanimate objects. Trees and rocks do not commit usury or ritualism or idolatry. The suffering that the Capitalists and religionists subject the children of the world to is almost unspeakable; there must come a day of Judgement; there must come a world revolution; it is inevitable. The Christians / Masonic cultists rule the world by brutality and by violence; it is only by brute force that these useless eaters can be eradicated. What goes around shall come around. Violent apocalyptic revolution is the only Final Solution which will work against violent militant governmentalists, religionists and private propertyists.
Why give thought for raiment (clothing)? Have one robe, no shoes, carry no purse nor coin, and have no servants. Give all that you have to the poor, etc., etc.
As I walked around London in the Christmas season, in celebration of Jesus the Christians were out shopping for mammon; i.e., clothes, perfumes, cosmetics and various other 'luxury' items, much of which is manufactured by third world labour slaves, some of whom are just little children. It is clear that the Christians do not believe that the rich will go to Hell; they seem to believe that they can just shop their way to Heaven and that they 'can' worship mammon. At Christmas in London, the churches will be full of rich people who will celebrate their belief in an anti-propertyist martyr. They appear to believe that by eating his flesh and drinking his blood, that they will go to Heaven in the afterlife, no matter how rich they are, even if they actually believe in Capitalism or are Usuryists themselves. Even the Christian armies in Iraq who have murdered 100,000 people celebrated Christmas and their chaplains will no doubt guarantee them eternal life in Heaven and they will go on torturing, murdering and raping Iraqis; same old, same old. Christianity is merely a justification for evil, and it will always be that way until the execution of the last of these Christian vermin. Christianity has nothing to do with the Final Solution of Messianic Judaism (Anarchist Communism) and it has nothing to do with the anti-propertyist martyr, Jesus, who appeared to deliberately and premeditatedly invoke the prophecies of Messianic Judaism 2000 years ago, just as I do today as an anti-propertyist in 2004.
Jesus, theism and religion.
It is clear that Jesus was not an atheist and that his alleged enemies were also not atheists; on the contrary the cultists of Solomon's Temple and indeed the Romans were evangelical theists, just as the Anglo American Zionist narco-terrorists are today. Religion (ritualism) and theism are two separate issues. The Devil may be a theist and a religionist, but there are many theists who are anti-religionists. The Marxists, although they may be anti-religious, and have a long practical history of executing the priesthood and attempting to eradicate religion, have thus far failed. Jesus however who also seemed to spent a great deal of time attacking religionists whom he referred to as a brood of vipers, serpents, of the their father the Devil, etc, was himself a theist. Anarchist Communism has nothing to do with theism or atheism; on the contrary that is a separate issue; there are Anarchist Communists who are theists and Anarchist Communists who are atheists.
Feurbachian projectionism. 'God is Evil.' 'Enemy of God.'
My father who is both a Christian and a Freemason believes in the existence of God, however his God is clearly the 'Father' God of Usury, idolatry, Egyptian cultism, narco-terrorism, drug money laundering, Zionism, global imperialism, etc. This does not of course mean that the alleged Creator of the Universe is a male narco-terrorist, or that She is a usuryist, CIA/British Crown/Zionist collaborator, torturer and murderer; merely that this is my father's Masonic Christian 'projection' of his own personal God; similarly with other genocidal narco-terrorist vermin such as Bush, Blair, Sharon and many who collaborate with them and protect them from justice. Even the CIA narco-terrorist collaborator, mass murderer and torturer Pinochet still eats the body and blood of Jesus in a Catholic Church and is promised Heaven by the idolatrous priesthood. It is clear to me that this God is evil, but that this God is a projection of what they want God to be. If the Devil himself was to state 'there is only One Creator' and that 'She is good' that would not make the Devil good.
The Future World.
The future collectivist world beyond the Final Revolutionary War of Economic Salvation must be a world without money, religion, governments, banks and temples, and the only way to attain that world is to eradicate the governmentalists and religionists. There is no other way. The Christian / Masonic vermin will not surrender to their executioners without a fight.
African Exodus. One Robe. No shoes. No shame.
Frankly I prefer to get naked and have . I don't really see the point of producing clothing in a world where half the children are malnourished, anyway. However this would not be practical in colder climates. The Solomonic Temple cultists cover their loins with aprons and the Christians generally consider the naked form to be shameful. This is because they are impure (unclean, unsanitary, insane). I am totally without shame. I have no shame of anything that has come out of my body or that has gone into my body. The Christians would happily starve the world and each have 100 pairs of shoes. In a recent popular women's television drama in the US and America, 'Sex and the City,' the heroine confessed that she had 100 pairs of $400 shoes, and yet this is a drama about rich women getting naked with rich men; even the rich prefer their lovers without clothes, and this same woman is used in television advertising for an American company which sells $50 jeans and is notorious for exploiting Third World labourers who hardly earn that in a month. That is Capitalism and that is Globalisation and that is Christianity and that is why the children of the world are starving and prostituting themselves. The Father God of the Christians is the God of Mammon, the evil God of this world; i.e. the Devil, and it does not matter what name they give him, for goodness has nothing to do with the name of a person or a god; to submit to evil or an evil definition of God is evil; to wage war against evil (the religionists and governmentalists) is good.
Imperialism the Highest Stage of Capitalism. The Anti-Messiah and the defeat of his armies.
Lenin, who was financed by the Rothschild Masonic cultists, foresaw, as many others did, the end of the age of the monarchs and the rise of the supercapitalists - bankers and corporationists; Capital is today exported to the Third World Usuryist collaborators in the form of loans, thus enslaving the world; however the world ruled by such supercapitalists is not without a monarch. Masonic cultists have their own secret king and if most of these cultists were aware of his identity he would hardly be a secret king, but he is a king never the less; and it is this king who is the Anti-Messiah to the Judaists, the Ad Dijjal to the Muslims and yet he is the Saviour to the Christian Capitalists and Masonic cultists. As much as his existence and his power and his wars have been foretold of old, so too is his defeat in an apocalyptic world war the like of which we have no memory, and which would require apocalyptic attacks against the richest cities of the world (the Capitalist financial centres) in order to be invoked into life. Since the enslaved children of the world, though innocent, are mostly superstitious and uneducated, then as far as I am concerned since the point of prophecy is not to interpret history, but to use it to change history, if apocalyptic guerrilla war against the Capitalist financial centres and the mass Holocaust of the Christians / Masonic cultists can be justified by the use of the apocalyptic prophecies, which many of the slaves of the Christians believe in, then so be it.
Where are the armies of Final Revolution?
I speak to the children of the present and the future. The conditions for world revolution against all governments will eventually appear, but not without the long predicted apocalyptic war against the financial capitals of the Christian vermin and their Masonic cult financial masters. Apocalyptic War will create the conditions for Revolution and must be invoked by the enemies of the Christians / Masonic cultists. The Liberation of the oppressed peoples of the world cannot come about without war against the financial capitals of the First World. The armies of the Revolution are the victims of the Christian Capitalists of the First World; there are always billions of such children. There is no shortage of slaves who do not wish to be slaves and who would rather fight against masters. On the day and the hour of Judgement the armies of final liberation will appear. Revolution by the rod of iron, fire, plague, poisoned waters and the destruction of all cities and the holocaust of all private propertyists, governmentalists and religionists must be and shall be dreadful and terrible and wrathful; one cannot wage war against genocidal apocalyptic Christians and Masonic cultists who have weapons of mass destruction unless one is willing to kill and to be killed and to use the same weapons as the enemy. Money is the god of the Christians and Masonic cultists and the command and control centres of the god of money are the First World financial centres, and these must be brutally eradicated without a jot or iota of mercy, just as the Capitalists show no mercy to their militant enemies or to the men, women and children of their Third World imperialist colonies. .. Marriage.
I believe that marriage is a form of prostitution; that women in the collectives (Kibbutzes) of the future world will have no need to enslave a male to provide food and shelter for their children and that their children will have many fathers, and will probably not be sure who their fathers are. It is totally against human nature to remain with only one lover for ones' entire life; this does not mean that one needs to hate ones' former lovers or even to discard them, however marriage is a private propertyist rite; one cannot 'possess' a person's soul or their eternal love just by swearing an oath. Love that is given freely is true love (i.e. free love); marriage is a form of 'pay love' (i.e. prostitution). Women's liberation is about the liberation of woman to love whoever they wish to. I find it impossible to be faithful to the mother of my children, in body or soul, as much as I love her dearly; it is simply against my nature; I was not created to love only one person, however much of my life is spent attempting to earn capitalist coin in order to provide for her and my children; that is because I am a slave in capitalism and because I am not free. Whatever Moses or Jesus allegedly had to say about the matter is irrelevant to me.
Sexual Laws. Marriage as legalised prostitution.
Sexual laws are the product of an ancient age, and shall disappear in the future world. If it is evil to have with a male or female, then whoever created us must be as evil as we are, however consensual is the opposite of evil by my judgement; it is how we love another person. Try as the religionists may to 'love' an idol or a deceased ancestor or some deity that we cannot see, touch, taste, hear or smell, it is simply impossible; we can only love each other and we express that love through . Homophobia is simply an expression of evil. Moses was an 80 year old anti-cultist Egyptian aristocrat who sought to liberate the Egyptian slave population and who demanded executions for those who had outside their marriage, and who sought to subject the human sacrifice cultists / Egyptian mystery cultists of his age to mass holocaust. I support his Judgement with regards to the holocaust of the idolaters / cultists / Egyptian religionists of his age, but I beg to differ on his laws regarding . On the other hand, the American Christian Capitalists are evangelically homophobic, and yet they are overt idolaters and are all too willing to collaborate with the Bush crime family who are themselves Egyptian mystery cultists whose rituals are overtly biual, whose gods are the ancient gods of human sacrifice cultism, and who are the defenders of CIA narco-terrorism and decades or rape, torture, murder and Capitalist Imperialism. The Law demands the execution of Egyptian mystery cultists, but the Anglo American Christians are all too willing to defend them. That is simply hypocrisy; that is simply evil claiming to be good, and such is the nature of macro-evil. Same old, same old.
What I believe.
Anti-Marxists Anarchist Communism (Fr. Communare: to share; i.e. sharing-ism) is about a future world without money, banks, governments, temples or religions. All property would be held in 'common' by one human family of brothers and sisters sharing resources and labour; there would be no barter or trade, just as it is in a family. Since I am not an idolater, I merely consider Moses, Jesus, Proudhon, Bakunin, Kropotkin, etc, to be my intellectual and spiritual mentors; I consider none of them to have been the Creator of the Universe and I do not agree entirely with any of them since I am a different person reacting to contemporary governmentalists and religionists. I believe in Kibbutzim (agricultural and technological collectivism) without private property, masters, priests or any form of religion in a world where all persons consider each other brothers and sisters. Love is the purpose of life, not materialism; is how we express love, not by torturing, bombing, raping, exploiting and enslaving others; for all these things the Christians do. That is what I believe. The rest is the details.
One cannot serve both Ja (god of the enslaved) and Mammon (materialism; the god of the rich).
Lucifer www.luciferia.tv For Anarchist Communism. For the global holocaust of all religionists, governmentalists and private propertyists, 'especially' the Christians and Masonic cultists. No mercy on they who deserve none. Ad hoc solidarity with militant Islam and global Jihad against the Ad Dijjal. Nuke London, Washington, Tel Aviv and the financial capitals of the First World for World Peace and the Unification of the Motherland.
|
|
 | | From: | Robert Peffers | | Subject: | Re: On Anarchist Christians, Anarchist Communists, Anti-propertyists and Freemasons. | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:26:50 -0000 |
|
|
 | "Lucifer - Judge of Judgement Day" wrote in message news:1106483451.033108.77560@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > On Anarchist Christians, Anarchist Communists, anti-Propertyists and > Freemasons. > > By > Lucifer > www.luciferia.tv > In London. > For Anarchist Communism. The 1000 Year Agricultural Revolution. > For the Global Holocaust of all Christians. > For Apocalyptic Guerilla War against the Financial Capitals of the > First World. > ___________________ > > January 2005. > > To my Seven billion brothers and sisters. > > On Practical (Actual) Christianity. > > Christianity, like all religion is an evil religion. In Iraq, the > Christian armies have already killed 100,000 people, and when Saddam > was an Anglo American collaborator he tortured and murdered 100,000 > Iraqi Communists, he invaded Iran, dropped poison gas on the Kurds and > was responsible for the deaths of millions, all as an Anglo American > ally; if Saddam had not been evil, the Christians would never have > considered him an ally. > > The Christian, Anglo-American, narco-terrorist military in Iraq are > today assisted by professional (paid in Capitalist coin) chaplains (the > priesthood), and whose President and Prime Minister were elected as > Christians, by Christians. The rape, torture and murder of Iraqis is no > accident; the Christian military are trained in the art of torture and > ual molestation; this is wilful and premeditated. The history of the > American Christian narco-terrorists in Latin America for example is a > history of rape, torture, murder and CIA backed military coups. Many of > their official training manuals can be read on the internet. Perhaps > one of the most interesting is the training manual for the Nicaraguan > anti-Communist narco-terrorists who were fighting the pro-Castro > Sandinistas; their strategy was simple; kidnap and execute government > officials; terrorise and murder the judiciary, police; create chaos. > The CIA have admitted that they armed these narco-terrorists and traded > narcotics with them, however the American Christians apparently believe > that rape, torture, murder and narco-terrorism can be justified in the > name of Jesus. Today there are Nicaraguan soldiers fighting alongside > the Anglo-American-Zionist narco-terrorists in Iraq. That is practical > Christianity. > > As one looks back in history, Christianity has always been an evil > religion, just as it is today. Christianity today exists as a > justification for usury, narco-terrorism, private propertyism, temple > worship, consumerism, etc. In London this week for example, one of the > City's multi-millionaire Catholic bankers who worked for a Masonic > financial institution was murdered, and the media described this > parasite as a pious Christian. 20,000 children die each day due to > Usuryist imposed poverty. That is practical Christianity; starve the > children of the world, enslave them, lend their corrupt > governmentalists money at interest and if they rebel against you, > define them as terrorists, recruit young unemployed football hooligans > as useful idiots, train them to torture, rape and murder and send them > out to kill your enemies. That is practical Christianity. > > Some Anarchists may argue 'Oh but Jesus was an > 'anti-propertyist,' and an 'anti-religionist' who took the side > of the oppressed against the rich and the religious, and cursed them > all to hell, but that has nothing to do with practical Christianity, > that is Anarchism (Anarchos; contrary to authority: a society without > private property or government). Christians may argue 'Oh but we do > not believe in anti-propertyism; anti-propertyism would not help us > become more rich' and yet on the other hand they worship an > anti-propertyist as the Creator (i.e., idolatry; an executable > offence), eat his flesh, drink his blood, construct idols to him, build > temples to him with a professional priesthood of Capitalists and > worship him as the god of the rich and the religious; that is the evil > of the Christians and they have nothing to do with anti-propertyism. > When a Christian says 'I do not believe in anti-propertyism' they > deny Christ, but these evil hypocrites will never the less still claim > to be Christians and the rape, torture and murder of innocents by the > Christian armies will continue and half the world will continue to be > malnourished and most of the world will continue to be the usury > victims and the labour slaves of the rich Christians. > > Jesus and Anarchism. Property is Theft. > > Some Anarchists are very anti-Jesus, and I find this quite disturbing, > since if one considers the history of anti-propertyists and > anti-religionists, Jesus is clearly an eminent anti-propertyist saint > and martyr. Jesus was not Proudhon, Bakunin, or Kropotkin. Jesus did > not live in 19th century Europe, and he left us no writings written by > his own hand, rather we only have various Chinese whispers of him, and > there are some who will argue that we cannot even be sure of his > existence; but as a political thinker, what is clear from what has been > written of him is that he stands out clearly as an anti-propertyist. > > The cultists of Solomon's Temple. > > Jesus' father was allegedly Zechariah the high priest of the > Solomonic Temple cult whose priesthood eventually issued a large reward > for his capture. His contemporary enemies were cultists of his > father's own religion, just as the enemies of the anti-propertyist > Kropotkin, who was an aristocrat, were the aristocracy. One has to > judge Jesus in the context of his first century social environment; he > was not a 19th century anti-propertyist living in Russia, nor a 21st > century anti-propertyist living in London. Today the cult of > Solomon's Temple still exists. In London, near the Covent Garden > Piazza, stands perhaps the most impressive piece of architecture in all > of London, and this is the Temple of my father's religious cult. The > inner sanctum of this Temple is a deliberate architectural copy of > Solomon's Temple. The religious cult's (cult: to kill; they are a > military order of ritualists / mystery cultists who are sworn to > eternal obedience to their king) lawyers who argued for the tax exempt > status of the building described it as a 'Temple of Religion' and > that is exactly what it is. As an anti-propertyist, anti-religionist > son of one these religious cultists, it is unsurprising to me that > another son of these cultists 2000 years ago, cursed them, raged > against them, threatened them with eternal judgement and sought to > raise revolution against them. It is not unsurprising that they > eventually sought his execution. My father is both a Christian > 'and' a Masonic cultist, and as far as I am concerned it is the > same ancient and evil religion. > > Final War, Judgement (Judah Mentis: the mind of Judah) Day and the 1000 > Year Agricultural Revolution. > > The Day of Judgement and the Final Holocaust of the idolaters is about > the global Holocaust of all religionists, 'especially' the > Solomonic cultists and Christians. That is what I believe and what I > propagate; that is my Judgement and long have I cried out for world > revolution against these vermin and I have perfect faith that this will > come about whether I live or die, and that the children of the future > will carry this out. > > There are seven billion people here. Half are malnourished. This > injustice is not caused by a 'system,' but by persons. There is no > 'Capitalist system;' there are only Capitalists and Capitalists are > people, not buildings or inanimate objects. Trees and rocks do not > commit usury or ritualism or idolatry. The suffering that the > Capitalists and religionists subject the children of the world to is > almost unspeakable; there must come a day of Judgement; there must come > a world revolution; it is inevitable. The Christians / Masonic cultists > rule the world by brutality and by violence; it is only by brute force > that these useless eaters can be eradicated. What goes around shall > come around. Violent apocalyptic revolution is the only Final Solution > which will work against violent militant governmentalists, religionists > and private propertyists. > > Why give thought for raiment (clothing)? Have one robe, no shoes, carry > no purse nor coin, and have no servants. Give all that you have to the > poor, etc., etc. > > As I walked around London in the Christmas season, in celebration of > Jesus the Christians were out shopping for mammon; i.e., clothes, > perfumes, cosmetics and various other 'luxury' items, much of which > is manufactured by third world labour slaves, some of whom are just > little children. It is clear that the Christians do not believe that > the rich will go to Hell; they seem to believe that they can just shop > their way to Heaven and that they 'can' worship mammon. At > Christmas in London, the churches will be full of rich people who will > celebrate their belief in an anti-propertyist martyr. They appear to > believe that by eating his flesh and drinking his blood, that they will > go to Heaven in the afterlife, no matter how rich they are, even if > they actually believe in Capitalism or are Usuryists themselves. Even > the Christian armies in Iraq who have murdered 100,000 people > celebrated Christmas and their chaplains will no doubt guarantee them > eternal life in Heaven and they will go on torturing, murdering and > raping Iraqis; same old, same old. Christianity is merely a > justification for evil, and it will always be that way until the > execution of the last of these Christian vermin. Christianity has > nothing to do with the Final Solution of Messianic Judaism (Anarchist > Communism) and it has nothing to do with the anti-propertyist martyr, > Jesus, who appeared to deliberately and premeditatedly invoke the > prophecies of Messianic Judaism 2000 years ago, just as I do today as > an anti-propertyist in 2004. > > Jesus, theism and religion. > > It is clear that Jesus was not an atheist and that his alleged enemies > were also not atheists; on the contrary the cultists of Solomon's > Temple and indeed the Romans were evangelical theists, just as the > Anglo American Zionist narco-terrorists are today. Religion (ritualism) > and theism are two separate issues. The Devil may be a theist and a > religionist, but there are many theists who are anti-religionists. The > Marxists, although they may be anti-religious, and have a long > practical history of executing the priesthood and attempting to > eradicate religion, have thus far failed. Jesus however who also seemed > to spent a great deal of time attacking religionists whom he referred > to as a brood of vipers, serpents, of the their father the Devil, etc, > was himself a theist. Anarchist Communism has nothing to do with theism > or atheism; on the contrary that is a separate issue; there are > Anarchist Communists who are theists and Anarchist Communists who are > atheists. > > Feurbachian projectionism. 'God is Evil.' 'Enemy of God.' > > My father who is both a Christian and a Freemason believes in the > existence of God, however his God is clearly the 'Father' God of > Usury, idolatry, Egyptian cultism, narco-terrorism, drug money > laundering, Zionism, global imperialism, etc. This does not of course > mean that the alleged Creator of the Universe is a male > narco-terrorist, or that She is a usuryist, CIA/British Crown/Zionist > collaborator, torturer and murderer; merely that this is my father's > Masonic Christian 'projection' of his own personal God; similarly > with other genocidal narco-terrorist vermin such as Bush, Blair, Sharon > and many who collaborate with them and protect them from justice. Even > the CIA narco-terrorist collaborator, mass murderer and torturer > Pinochet still eats the body and blood of Jesus in a Catholic Church > and is promised Heaven by the idolatrous priesthood. It is clear to me > that this God is evil, but that this God is a projection of what they > want God to be. If the Devil himself was to state 'there is only One > Creator' and that 'She is good' that would not make the Devil > good. > > The Future World. > > The future collectivist world beyond the Final Revolutionary War of > Economic Salvation must be a world without money, religion, > governments, banks and temples, and the only way to attain that world > is to eradicate the governmentalists and religionists. There is no > other way. The Christian / Masonic vermin will not surrender to their > executioners without a fight. > > African Exodus. One Robe. No shoes. No shame. > > Frankly I prefer to get naked and have . I don't really see the > point of producing clothing in a world where half the children are > malnourished, anyway. However this would not be practical in colder > climates. The Solomonic Temple cultists cover their loins with aprons > and the Christians generally consider the naked form to be shameful. > This is because they are impure (unclean, unsanitary, insane). I am > totally without shame. I have no shame of anything that has come out of > my body or that has gone into my body. The Christians would happily > starve the world and each have 100 pairs of shoes. In a recent popular > women's television drama in the US and America, 'Sex and the > City,' the heroine confessed that she had 100 pairs of $400 shoes, > and yet this is a drama about rich women getting naked with rich men; > even the rich prefer their lovers without clothes, and this same woman > is used in television advertising for an American company which sells > $50 jeans and is notorious for exploiting Third World labourers who > hardly earn that in a month. That is Capitalism and that is > Globalisation and that is Christianity and that is why the children of > the world are starving and prostituting themselves. The Father God of > the Christians is the God of Mammon, the evil God of this world; i.e. > the Devil, and it does not matter what name they give him, for goodness > has nothing to do with the name of a person or a god; to submit to evil > or an evil definition of God is evil; to wage war against evil (the > religionists and governmentalists) is good. > > Imperialism the Highest Stage of Capitalism. The Anti-Messiah and the > defeat of his armies. > > Lenin, who was financed by the Rothschild Masonic cultists, foresaw, as > many others did, the end of the age of the monarchs and the rise of the > supercapitalists - bankers and corporationists; Capital is today > exported to the Third World Usuryist collaborators in the form of > loans, thus enslaving the world; however the world ruled by such > supercapitalists is not without a monarch. Masonic cultists have their > own secret king and if most of these cultists were aware of his > identity he would hardly be a secret king, but he is a king never the > less; and it is this king who is the Anti-Messiah to the Judaists, the > Ad Dijjal to the Muslims and yet he is the Saviour to the Christian > Capitalists and Masonic cultists. As much as his existence and his > power and his wars have been foretold of old, so too is his defeat in > an apocalyptic world war the like of which we have no memory, and which > would require apocalyptic attacks against the richest cities of the > world (the Capitalist financial centres) in order to be invoked into > life. Since the enslaved children of the world, though innocent, are > mostly superstitious and uneducated, then as far as I am concerned > since the point of prophecy is not to interpret history, but to use it > to change history, if apocalyptic guerrilla war against the Capitalist > financial centres and the mass Holocaust of the Christians / Masonic > cultists can be justified by the use of the apocalyptic prophecies, > which many of the slaves of the Christians believe in, then so be it. > > Where are the armies of Final Revolution? > > I speak to the children of the present and the future. The conditions > for world revolution against all governments will eventually appear, > but not without the long predicted apocalyptic war against the > financial capitals of the Christian vermin and their Masonic cult > financial masters. Apocalyptic War will create the conditions for > Revolution and must be invoked by the enemies of the Christians / > Masonic cultists. The Liberation of the oppressed peoples of the world > cannot come about without war against the financial capitals of the > First World. The armies of the Revolution are the victims of the > Christian Capitalists of the First World; there are always billions of > such children. There is no shortage of slaves who do not wish to be > slaves and who would rather fight against masters. On the day and the > hour of Judgement the armies of final liberation will appear. > Revolution by the rod of iron, fire, plague, poisoned waters and the > destruction of all cities and the holocaust of all private > propertyists, governmentalists and religionists must be and shall be > dreadful and terrible and wrathful; one cannot wage war against > genocidal apocalyptic Christians and Masonic cultists who have weapons > of mass destruction unless one is willing to kill and to be killed and > to use the same weapons as the enemy. Money is the god of the > Christians and Masonic cultists and the command and control centres of > the god of money are the First World financial centres, and these must > be brutally eradicated without a jot or iota of mercy, just as the > Capitalists show no mercy to their militant enemies or to the men, > women and children of their Third World imperialist colonies. > . > Marriage. > > I believe that marriage is a form of prostitution; that women in the > collectives (Kibbutzes) of the future world will have no need to > enslave a male to provide food and shelter for their children and that > their children will have many fathers, and will probably not be sure > who their fathers are. It is totally against human nature to remain > with only one lover for ones' entire life; this does not mean that > one needs to hate ones' former lovers or even to discard them, > however marriage is a private propertyist rite; one cannot > 'possess' a person's soul or their eternal love just by swearing > an oath. Love that is given freely is true love (i.e. free love); > marriage is a form of 'pay love' (i.e. prostitution). Women's > liberation is about the liberation of woman to love whoever they wish > to. I find it impossible to be faithful to the mother of my children, > in body or soul, as much as I love her dearly; it is simply against my > nature; I was not created to love only one person, however much of my > life is spent attempting to earn capitalist coin in order to provide > for her and my children; that is because I am a slave in capitalism and > because I am not free. Whatever Moses or Jesus allegedly had to say > about the matter is irrelevant to me. > > Sexual Laws. Marriage as legalised prostitution. > > Sexual laws are the product of an ancient age, and shall disappear in > the future world. If it is evil to have with a male or female, then > whoever created us must be as evil as we are, however consensual is > the opposite of evil by my judgement; it is how we love another person. > Try as the religionists may to 'love' an idol or a deceased > ancestor or some deity that we cannot see, touch, taste, hear or smell, > it is simply impossible; we can only love each other and we express > that love through . Homophobia is simply an expression of evil. > Moses was an 80 year old anti-cultist Egyptian aristocrat who sought to > liberate the Egyptian slave population and who demanded executions for > those who had outside their marriage, and who sought to subject the > human sacrifice cultists / Egyptian mystery cultists of his age to mass > holocaust. I support his Judgement with regards to the holocaust of the > idolaters / cultists / Egyptian religionists of his age, but I beg to > differ on his laws regarding . On the other hand, the American > Christian Capitalists are evangelically homophobic, and yet they are > overt idolaters and are all too willing to collaborate with the Bush > crime family who are themselves Egyptian mystery cultists whose rituals > are overtly biual, whose gods are the ancient gods of human > sacrifice cultism, and who are the defenders of CIA narco-terrorism and > decades or rape, torture, murder and Capitalist Imperialism. The Law > demands the execution of Egyptian mystery cultists, but the Anglo > American Christians are all too willing to defend them. That is simply > hypocrisy; that is simply evil claiming to be good, and such is the > nature of macro-evil. Same old, same old. > > What I believe. > > Anti-Marxists Anarchist Communism (Fr. Communare: to share; i.e. > sharing-ism) is about a future world without money, banks, governments, > temples or religions. All property would be held in 'common' by one > human family of brothers and sisters sharing resources and labour; > there would be no barter or trade, just as it is in a family. Since I > am not an idolater, I merely consider Moses, Jesus, Proudhon, Bakunin, > Kropotkin, etc, to be my intellectual and spiritual mentors; I consider > none of them to have been the Creator of the Universe and I do not > agree entirely with any of them since I am a different person reacting > to contemporary governmentalists and religionists. I believe in > Kibbutzim (agricultural and technological collectivism) without private > property, masters, priests or any form of religion in a world where all > persons consider each other brothers and sisters. Love is the purpose > of life, not materialism; is how we express love, not by torturing, > bombing, raping, exploiting and enslaving others; for all these things > the Christians do. That is what I believe. The rest is the details. > > One cannot serve both Ja (god of the enslaved) and Mammon (materialism; > the god of the rich). > > Lucifer > www.luciferia.tv > For Anarchist Communism. > For the global holocaust of all religionists, governmentalists and > private propertyists, 'especially' the Christians and Masonic > cultists. > No mercy on they who deserve none. > Ad hoc solidarity with militant Islam and global Jihad against the Ad > Dijjal. > Nuke London, Washington, Tel Aviv and the financial capitals of the > First World for World Peace and the Unification of the Motherland. > PLONK! --
Aefauldlie, (Scots word for Honestly), Robert, (Auld Bob), Peffers, Kelty, Fife, Scotland, (UK). Web Site, "The Eck's Files":- http://www.peffers50.freeserve.co.uk
|
|
 | | From: | Paul Hyett | | Subject: | Re: On Anarchist Christians, Anarchist Communists, Anti-propertyists and Freemasons. | | Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:38:15 +0000 |
|
|
 | In uk.politics.misc on Sun, 23 Jan 2005 at 14:26:50, Robert Peffers wrote : > >> >PLONK!
You quoted his entire post to add that?! -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
|
|
|
| | |
|
 |