|
|
 | | From: | ice9 | | Subject: | Dolly Marie Salas is Still Guilty of: | | Date: | 12 Jan 2005 17:12:48 -0800 |
|
|
 | Dolly Marie Salas (née "Tucker") is still guilty of not following
state requirements to document financial transactions between
caregiver and client.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
| | From: | itsveryverynice at prodigy.net | | Subject: | Re: Dolly Marie Salas is Still Guilty of: | | Date: | 21 Jan 2005 14:29:04 -0800 |
|
|
| Paul Broadway wrote:
"Is this you Ice9? Have you changed your sock puppet? You know what I
like
about you? I like the fact that you post from behind an anonymous
persona
and have the ability to pretend you're tough."
As far as your suggestion
about Tim May, no, I don't care to converse with him. He's an idiot,
and
you know what happens when you argue with an idiot, you upset the idiot
and
you waste your time. By the way, what I do for a living is not who I
am,
you should know that. I like the fact that you used the foisting twice
in
the above post. Is it a new word for you? Must be, you seem to enjoy
using
it. As far as Dolly Marie Salas goes, don't know her, don't want to.
How
do you know her? Was she responsible for your care and feeding? Now,
back
to the charge of slander, I first saw your racism in your post about
Filipina Hags, do you remember that one? It was about how we should put
all
of the Filipina ladies in San Diego on an aircraft carrier headed back
to
the Phillipines. I guess a Filipina you off that day. That isn't
slander, that is fact, you can check it on google if you want."
--
Paul Broadway
As regards "what you like about me," I can only reply: "What's to
like?"
As regards Tim May, he wouldn't argue with you anyway.
As for "foisting," I just thought I'd foist it on you!
As regards the original subject of this thread (which you adamantly
refuse to acknowledge as the subject), she owes many, and has to pay,
like it or not.
As regards those "Filipina hags," I'll get back to you another time
about the subject... or as McArthur would say: "I shall return!"
As regards "what you do" and it's having nothing to do with "who you
are," get a clue! I've known other "drug dealers" to say the same.
--ICE9
|
|
| | From: | Paul Broadway | | Subject: | Re: Dolly Marie Salas is Still Guilty of: | | Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:26:02 GMT |
|
|
|
wrote in message
news:1106346544.555980.133010@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> As regards "what you like about me," I can only reply: "What's to
> like?"
Nothing, except that you like to be an anonymous twit who has an inflated
ego, that's kind of funny in a sad way. You know where to find me if you
want to discuss this matter any further.
> As regards Tim May, he wouldn't argue with you anyway.
Then why did you post his racial slurs and suggest that I start a dialog
with him? I guess you are dishonest as well as a racist?
> As regards the original subject of this thread (which you adamantly
> refuse to acknowledge as the subject), she owes many, and has to pay,
> like it or not.
Again, I will ask the question, was she derelict in your care and feeding?
Or is she someone who slighted you, so you now slander her name on Usenet?
Why don't you explain in detail, I have not heard enough of your ramblings.
> As regards those "Filipina hags," I'll get back to you another time
> about the subject... or as McArthur would say: "I shall return!"
If you do, I will ignore it. You have stated quite enough on that subject
already. I don't hold anyone in as low of a regard, as you hold Filipino
women.
> As regards "what you do" and it's having nothing to do with "who you
> are," get a clue! I've known other "drug dealers" to say the same.
Perhaps, but I have known other cowards who hide and snipe at people. If I
am a "drug dealer" in your eyes for owning a bar, then I guess I will have
to live with that. You won't see me hiding my identity from people while I
am slandering someone on the internet. I guess you know what that makes you
in my eyes.
--
Paul Broadway
www.broadwaypub.com
San Diego, Ca.
|
|
| | From: | Not Brian David Smith | | Subject: | Re: Dolly Marie Salas is Still Guilty of: | | Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:31:10 -0800 |
|
|
| Paul Broadway wrote:
>
> wrote in message
> news:1106346544.555980.133010@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> > As regards "what you like about me," I can only reply: "What's to
> > like?"
>
> Nothing, except that you like to be an anonymous twit who has an inflated
> ego, that's kind of funny in a sad way. You know where to find me if you
> want to discuss this matter any further.
At least until you get frustrated and killfile him, of course.
--
Produced by Alan Smithee
|
|
| | From: | Paul Broadway | | Subject: | Re: Dolly Marie Salas is Still Guilty of: | | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:50:19 GMT |
|
|
| Ice9, where have you been? I see that you are still angry at various people
in San Diego. Is this one of the people from the Golden West Hotel, or is
it one of the people from Kobey's swap meet? Good to see that you survived
another year, I hope that you have less to complain about as time goes on.
Remember that racism is a personal prison.
--
Paul Broadway
www.broadwaypub.com
San Diego, Ca.
"ice9" wrote in message
news:f081c4c4.0501121712.6ce2f683@posting.google.com...
> Dolly Marie Salas (née "Tucker") is still guilty of not following
> state requirements to document financial transactions between
> caregiver and client.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
|
|
| | From: | Andrew | | Subject: | Re: Dolly Marie Salas is Still Guilty of: | | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:12:22 -0800 |
|
|
|
"Paul Broadway" wrote in message
news:fZDGd.8569> another
> Remember that racism is a personal prison.
What the heck does that mean?
|
|
| | From: | Paul Broadway | | Subject: | Re: Dolly Marie Salas is Still Guilty of: | | Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:40:23 GMT |
|
|
|
"Andrew" wrote in message
news:oDXGd.8078$nt.3598@fed1read06...
>
> "Paul Broadway" wrote in message
> news:fZDGd.8569> another
>
> > Remember that racism is a personal prison.
>
> What the heck does that mean?
Ice9 has made several posts that were racially motivated in the past. He
blames people who are different than he is for his problems. He is very
unhappy and is in a prison of his own making. I feel sorry for him. Google
his address and all will be clear.
--
Paul Broadway
www.broadwaypub.com
San Diego, Ca.
|
|
| | From: | itsveryverynice at prodigy.net | | Subject: | Re: Dolly Marie Salas is Still Guilty of: | | Date: | 23 Jan 2005 15:58:13 -0800 |
|
|
| Reply-To: "Paul Broadway"
From: "Paul Broadway"
Newsgroups: sdnet.general,sdnet.politics
References:
<1106264014.395480.202970@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<1106346544.555980.133010@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Dolly Marie Salas is Still Guilty of:
Lines: 44
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID:
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:26:02 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.241.217.11
X-Complaints-To: a...@earthlink.net
X-Trace: newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net 1106349962 4.241.217.11 (Fri,
21 Jan 2005 15:26:02 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:26:02 PST
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
wrote in message
news:1106346544.555980.133010@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> As regards "what you like about me," I can only reply: "What's to
> like?"
>>Nothing, except that you like to be an anonymous twit who has an
inflated
>>ego, that's kind of funny in a sad way. You know where to find me if
you
>>want to discuss this matter any further.
And you apparently are taking unfair commercial advantage of Usenet to
advertise your beer bar!:
["Google authorizes you to view and download a single copy of the
Materials solely for your personal, non-commercial use. You may not
sell or modify the Materials or reproduce, display, publicly perform,
distribute, or otherwise use the Materials in any way for any public or
commercial purpose without the written permission of Google. Special
rules may apply to the use of certain software and other items provided
via the Services, and are noted where appropriate."]
As regards "anonymity," why do you think Google itself has a "privacy
policy," bone-head?
> As regards Tim May, he wouldn't argue with you anyway.
>>Then why did you post his racial slurs and suggest that I start a
dialog
>>with him? I guess you are dishonest as well as a racist?
You came across as someone looking for a strawman to knock down in
cyberspace. I decided instead to offer you a major contender when it
comes to racial slurs and "uberMensch" mentality. Apparently, you're
not qualified to go the necessary rounds with someone who could easily
trump your simplistic, "nice guy" hand.
> As regards the original subject of this thread (which you adamantly
> refuse to acknowledge as the subject), she owes many, and has to pay,
> like it or not.
>>Again, I will ask the question, was she derelict in your care and
feeding?
>>Or is she someone who slighted you, so you now slander her name on
Usenet?
>>Why don't you explain in detail, I have not heard enough of your
ramblings.
You lie like rug, barkeep! The original thread was not posted for the
likes of you. I'm not one of your barroom drunks that you can easily
roll after hours!
> As regards those "Filipina hags," I'll get back to you another time
> about the subject... or as McArthur would say: "I shall return!"
>>If you do, I will ignore it. You have stated quite enough on that
subject
>>already. I don't hold anyone in as low of a regard, as you hold
Filipino
>>women.
Except for, perhaps, your beer-swilling customers, whose money you
gladly take and stuff in your pocket...Let's see, for every few cents
of beer you draw on tap, you must make an easy two bucks. And, of
course, you're not a bit racist about whose money you take, are you?
Everyone's an equal opportunity sucker, right?
> As regards "what you do" and it's having nothing to do with "who you
> are," get a clue! I've known other "drug dealers" to say the same.
>>Perhaps, but I have known other cowards who hide and snipe at people.
If I
>>am a "drug dealer" in your eyes for owning a bar, then I guess I will
have
>>to live with that.
Not to mention "the rest of us," who suffer the consequences of the
actions of your inebriated costumers. Say, have you ever kept a record
of the percentage of your costumers that drive away drunk and maim
and/or kill children on the street? Not to worry, though, rare it is
that drunk drivers are "racially motivated" when it comes to their
victims on the road! So, you can sleep peacefully, in good conscience.
>>You won't see me hiding my identity from people while I
>>am slandering someone on the internet. I guess you know what that
makes you
>>in my eyes.
You seem to have a hardon for anonymity. You know what that makes you
in the eyes of the ACLU? Let us not forget why the Supreme Court
upheld anonymity, Budweiser!
--ICE9
--
Paul Broadway
www.broadwaypub.com
San Diego, Ca.
|
|
|
