Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?

gigo448 at netscape.net

Andrealphus

From:	gigo448 at netscape.net
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	23 Jan 2005 05:05:49 -0800

Andrealphus wrote:
> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> > gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> >> Andrealphus wrote:
> >>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> >>>> Andrealphus wrote:
> >>>>>>> But my common sense seems superior to yours.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> How do you suppose i arrived at my own answer? I've got
> >>>>>> a Math equivalancy of ninth grade.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That explains it then. No common sense, and no math
abilities,
> >>>>> perhaps you should go back to school.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Then why would you choose seven bullets to play russian roulette
> >>>> with instead of 2? I certainly wouldn't.
> >>>
> >>> I am not choo
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Guess I'd opt for polygamy."
> >>
> >>
> >> 7 wives is seven chances, duhhh!!!
> >>
> >>
> >
> > And if ONE gets it they ALL get it KABOOM!
>
> How is one going to get it if they stay within the marriage? Do you
think
> that HIV just magically appears one day?

Tell that to the 100's of thousands of recipients who simply
woke up and realized they had it one day. No matter how many
partners they had. EVERY person is at RISK, and IS a Risk. You
are living in a dream world if you think they *magicly* aren't.

>
> --
> "Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
> particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
> religion capable of scientific truth."
>
> Albert Einstein

The comparison is next to nill, I'm sure Einstien would
be insulted by your ignorance, and your arrogance.

bd4u

From:	Andrealphus
Subject:	Re: If same-sex 'marriage' is legalized, why not polygamy?
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:10:05 GMT

gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
> Andrealphus wrote:
>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
>>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
>>>> Andrealphus wrote:
>>>>> gigo448@netscape.net wrote:
>>>>>> Andrealphus wrote:
>>>>>>>>> But my common sense seems superior to yours.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How do you suppose i arrived at my own answer? I've got
>>>>>>>> a Math equivalancy of ninth grade.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That explains it then. No common sense, and no math abilities,
>>>>>>> perhaps you should go back to school.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then why would you choose seven bullets to play russian roulette
>>>>>> with instead of 2? I certainly wouldn't.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not choo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Guess I'd opt for polygamy."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 7 wives is seven chances, duhhh!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> And if ONE gets it they ALL get it KABOOM!
>>
>> How is one going to get it if they stay within the marriage? Do
>> you think that HIV just magically appears one day?
>
> Tell that to the 100's of thousands of recipients who simply
> woke up and realized they had it one day. No matter how many
> partners they had. EVERY person is at RISK, and IS a Risk.

Nonsense. If you stay within a relationship with uninfected people/persons,
you are at zero risk.

You
> are living in a dream world if you think they *magicly* aren't.

Obviously, you have no knowledge of the subject you are attempting to
debate.

>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> "Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
>> particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
>> religion capable of scientific truth."
>>
>> Albert Einstein
>
> The comparison is next to nill, I'm sure Einstien would
> be insulted by your ignorance, and your arrogance.

Blah, blah... Try to prove your assertion. You are not qualified to tell
others what Einstien would have thought on any subject.

--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."

Albert Einstein