 | | From: | Bourbaki | | Subject: | Bush validated. | | Date: | Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:50:15 -0600 |
|
|
 | President Bush recently said, "The American people listened to
different assessments made about what was taking place in Iraq, and
they looked at the two candidates, and chose me."
I wasn't aware that 100 % of all votes (the American people presumably)
went for Bush. I had thought it was more closer to fifty-fifty. Is
Bush being arrogant, or is his math (the American people) correct?
NB
|
|
| | From: | frybread | | Subject: | Re: Bush validated. | | Date: | Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:48:13 -0600 |
|
|
| Bourbaki wrote:
> President Bush recently said, "The American people listened to
> different assessments made about what was taking place in Iraq, and
> they looked at the two candidates, and chose me."
>
> I wasn't aware that 100 % of all votes (the American people
presumably)
> went for Bush. I had thought it was more closer to fifty-fifty. Is
> Bush being arrogant, or is his math (the American people) correct?
>
> NB
Republicans aren't good at math.
|
|
| | From: | Lisa Cech | | Subject: | Re: Bush validated. | | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:53:38 -0600 |
|
|
| In article <1105937275.711727.249170@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"frybread" wrote:
> Bourbaki wrote:
> > President Bush recently said, "The American people listened to
> > different assessments made about what was taking place in Iraq, and
> > they looked at the two candidates, and chose me."
> >
> > I wasn't aware that 100 % of all votes (the American people
> presumably)
> > went for Bush. I had thought it was more closer to fifty-fifty. Is
> > Bush being arrogant, or is his math (the American people) correct?
> >
> > NB
>
> Republicans aren't good at math.
What? The Iraq war hasn't cost *much* more than the original $1-2
billion dollar price tag. Has it?
--Lisa
|
|
| | From: | Bourbaki | | Subject: | Re: Bush validated. | | Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:28:57 -0600 |
|
|
| > President Bush recently said, "The American people listened to
> different assessments made about what was taking place in Iraq, and
> they looked at the two candidates, and chose me."
> I wasn't aware that 100 % of all votes (the American people
presumably)
> went for Bush. I had thought it was more closer to fifty-fifty. Is
> Bush being arrogant, or is his math (the American people) correct?
> NB
Republicans aren't good at math.
Or perhaps they are playing a mean game of perception makes reality.
|
|
