What you won't see today is he New England Patriots winning by
failure-ie getting a point for missing a field goal.

The Patriots have won their championships on good field goas.

the cfl rewards failure by giving a point for missing a field goal.

Should 33% of a run be given for foul balls that have the distance?

Should 33% of a point be given in basketball for hiting the rim?

the cfl is a failure

the cfl single point failure rule is ridiculous

HTH

From:	Jason Hoehn
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:55:45 GMT

"Admiral Canader" wrote in message
news:2d80ca8c.0501231019.9aa80f0@posting.google.com...

>

I see the one trick pony is back,....

From:	Wally
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:07:20 -0500

Jason Hoehn wrote in message: news:
> "Admiral Canader" wrote in message
> news:2d80ca8c.0501231019.9aa80f0@posting.google.com...
>
> >
>
> I see the one trick pony is back,....
>
>
>
Looks to me like he was ejected from Carelton U (where he used to post from)
and bribed his way into Lakehead University, where he is now.

Pitiful. This guys not that bright, which means he's going to be in the system
for a long, long time.

From:	SPIDERMAN
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:50:14 -0500

despite what you feel about him personally, i would be inclined to agree.
you shouldn't be able to win a game on what is, essentially, failure.

"Wally" wrote in message
news:MPG.1c5dbfefdb2866bb9896c8@news.individual.net...
> Jason Hoehn wrote in message: news:
>> "Admiral Canader" wrote in message
>> news:2d80ca8c.0501231019.9aa80f0@posting.google.com...
>>
>> >
>>
>> I see the one trick pony is back,....
>>
>>
>>
> Looks to me like he was ejected from Carelton U (where he used to post
> from)
> and bribed his way into Lakehead University, where he is now.
>
> Pitiful. This guys not that bright, which means he's going to be in the
> system
> for a long, long time.

From:	Krammerhead
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 01:18:29 GMT

SPIDERMAN wrote:
> despite what you feel about him personally, i would be inclined to agree.
> you shouldn't be able to win a game on what is, essentially, failure.

You are not automatically given a point for missing a field goal in the
CFL anyway. If you are going to argue about the rules you should at
least know then. Secondly if that is going to be an argument isn't
kicking a field goal essentially a chance at a reward for failing to
score a touchdown?

Krammerhead

From:	miguel
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:34:45 -0800

Krammerhead wrote:

>SPIDERMAN wrote:
>> despite what you feel about him personally, i would be inclined to agree.
>> you shouldn't be able to win a game on what is, essentially, failure.

>You are not automatically given a point for missing a field goal in the
>CFL anyway. If you are going to argue about the rules you should at
>least know then. Secondly if that is going to be an argument isn't
>kicking a field goal essentially a chance at a reward for failing to
>score a touchdown?

Could you explain the rule? I think somebody told me it's called a
Rube. Why would you name something a Rube? Anyway when you kick a
field goal at least you have to get the ball between the uprights.
The single point failure rule doesn't require any skill except kicking
hard, does it? Where the hell is the skill in that? Any soccer player
could do that.

From:	Jr.
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2005 02:18:00 GMT

I think you are talking about a "rouge"
when the team kicking, either kicks off or tries a FG and the receiving team
or the team on defense does not run the ball out of the endzone, the kicking
team is awarded one point.

"miguel" wrote in message
news:02k8v05me5gv3ok80lfj8kike61k0tte43@4ax.com...
> Krammerhead wrote:
>
>>SPIDERMAN wrote:
>>> despite what you feel about him personally, i would be inclined to
>>> agree.
>>> you shouldn't be able to win a game on what is, essentially, failure.
>
>>You are not automatically given a point for missing a field goal in the
>>CFL anyway. If you are going to argue about the rules you should at
>>least know then. Secondly if that is going to be an argument isn't
>>kicking a field goal essentially a chance at a reward for failing to
>>score a touchdown?
>
> Could you explain the rule? I think somebody told me it's called a
> Rube. Why would you name something a Rube? Anyway when you kick a
> field goal at least you have to get the ball between the uprights.
> The single point failure rule doesn't require any skill except kicking
> hard, does it? Where the hell is the skill in that? Any soccer player
> could do that.

From:	Agent Smith
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:55:50 -0500

"Jr." wrote in message
news:sVYId.25696$EG1.10914@attbi_s53...
>I think you are talking about a "rouge"
> when the team kicking, either kicks off or tries a FG and the receiving
> team or the team on defense does not run the ball out of the endzone, the
> kicking team is awarded one point.

He knows what it is called, and he knows how it works....the only thing he
doesn't know is how much of an idiot he is.

From:	miguel
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:33:56 -0800

"Agent Smith," wanker, wrote:
>"Jr." wrote

>>I think you are talking about a "rouge"
>> when the team kicking, either kicks off or tries a FG and the receiving
>> team or the team on defense does not run the ball out of the endzone, the
>> kicking team is awarded one point.

>He knows what it is called, and he knows how it works....the only thing he
>doesn't know is how much of an idiot he is.

The rule is completely invalid. Kicking the ball through the end zone
is no more difficult than taking a shit. Do they give points in
Canada for taking shits?

Get real, JACKASS.

miguel

From:	Agent Smith
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:03:08 -0500

"miguel" wrote in message
news:02k8v05me5gv3ok80lfj8kike61k0tte43@4ax.com...
> Krammerhead wrote:
>
>>SPIDERMAN wrote:
>>> despite what you feel about him personally, i would be inclined to
>>> agree.
>>> you shouldn't be able to win a game on what is, essentially, failure.
>
>>You are not automatically given a point for missing a field goal in the
>>CFL anyway. If you are going to argue about the rules you should at
>>least know then. Secondly if that is going to be an argument isn't
>>kicking a field goal essentially a chance at a reward for failing to
>>score a touchdown?
>
> Could you explain the rule? I think somebody told me it's called a
> Rube. Why would you name something a Rube? Anyway when you kick a
> field goal at least you have to get the ball between the uprights.
> The single point failure rule doesn't require any skill except kicking
> hard, does it? Where the hell is the skill in that? Any soccer player
> could do that.

I'm sorry you are mistaken. When that person said it was called a Rube, they
weren't refering to the rule, they were refering to you.

From:	miguel
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:29:36 -0800

"Agent Smith" wrote:
>"miguel" wrote
>> Krammerhead wrote:

>>>SPIDERMAN wrote:
>>>> despite what you feel about him personally, i would be inclined to
>>>> agree.
>>>> you shouldn't be able to win a game on what is, essentially, failure.

>>>You are not automatically given a point for missing a field goal in the
>>>CFL anyway. If you are going to argue about the rules you should at
>>>least know then. Secondly if that is going to be an argument isn't
>>>kicking a field goal essentially a chance at a reward for failing to
>>>score a touchdown?

>> Could you explain the rule? I think somebody told me it's called a
>> Rube. Why would you name something a Rube? Anyway when you kick a
>> field goal at least you have to get the ball between the uprights.
>> The single point failure rule doesn't require any skill except kicking
>> hard, does it? Where the hell is the skill in that? Any soccer player
>> could do that.

>I'm sorry you are mistaken. When that person said it was called a Rube, they
>weren't refering to the rule, they were refering to you.

Now that's just plain uncalled for. You are a person of very poor
breeding, aren't you?

miguel

From:	Agent Smith
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:58:46 -0500

"miguel" wrote in message
news:mqq8v01a04g0a7ua3olt4vq95t6ao520ku@4ax.com...
> "Agent Smith" wrote:
>>"miguel" wrote
>>> Krammerhead wrote:
>
>>>>SPIDERMAN wrote:
>>>>> despite what you feel about him personally, i would be inclined to
>>>>> agree.
>>>>> you shouldn't be able to win a game on what is, essentially, failure.
>
>>>>You are not automatically given a point for missing a field goal in the
>>>>CFL anyway. If you are going to argue about the rules you should at
>>>>least know then. Secondly if that is going to be an argument isn't
>>>>kicking a field goal essentially a chance at a reward for failing to
>>>>score a touchdown?
>
>>> Could you explain the rule? I think somebody told me it's called a
>>> Rube. Why would you name something a Rube? Anyway when you kick a
>>> field goal at least you have to get the ball between the uprights.
>>> The single point failure rule doesn't require any skill except kicking
>>> hard, does it? Where the hell is the skill in that? Any soccer player
>>> could do that.
>
>>I'm sorry you are mistaken. When that person said it was called a Rube,
>>they
>>weren't refering to the rule, they were refering to you.
>
> Now that's just plain uncalled for. You are a person of very poor
> breeding, aren't you?
>
> miguel

Back to soc.singles you greasy, filthy failure.

From:	owl
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:40:29 -0500

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:34:45 -0800, miguel wrote:

>Krammerhead wrote:
>
>>SPIDERMAN wrote:
>>> despite what you feel about him personally, i would be inclined to agree.
>>> you shouldn't be able to win a game on what is, essentially, failure.
>
>>You are not automatically given a point for missing a field goal in the
>>CFL anyway. If you are going to argue about the rules you should at
>>least know then. Secondly if that is going to be an argument isn't
>>kicking a field goal essentially a chance at a reward for failing to
>>score a touchdown?
>
>Could you explain the rule? I think somebody told me it's called a
>Rube. Why would you name something a Rube? Anyway when you kick a
>field goal at least you have to get the ball between the uprights.
>The single point failure rule doesn't require any skill except kicking
>hard, does it? Where the hell is the skill in that? Any soccer player
>could do that.

Rouge. Old term - originally there were plays that subtracted off the
team score. A team could have a negative total - "in the red". They
changed that, but the name stuck.

It's not so much a single rule as a philosophy that covers a bunch of
situations.

To keep it simple, forget all the out-of-bounds stuff. The division
line is the kicking game - the NFL has a dead-ball philosophy and the
CFL has a live-ball philosophy.

In the NFL, there's the fair catch on punts and the dead ball on a
missed field goal; punts into the end-zone are pretty much automatic
(no downside).

In the CFL there's no fair catch and after a punt or an unsuccessful
field goal attempt, the ball is live. Punt returns are more
challenging - guys can get flattened: the kicking team has to allow 5
yards from the ball but sometimes they 'forget'. On punts into the
end-zone and missed field goals, there's more excitement trying to run
it out ... or even kicking it back out to avoid 'giving up the point'.

Partly because of the extra point variations, there's more
decision-making and more wild finishes. Special-teams play takes on a
different dimension in the CFL - 3 downs, live ball, 50% large playing
area, more point variations). The CFL is the "anything can happen"
league.

If you're switching eyes from the CFL to the NFL, it can look slow and
constrained. If you're switching eyes from the NFL to CFL, it can
look chaotic and spread out.

From:	Agent Smith
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:06:25 -0500

"owl" wrote in message
news:dom8v0t4c3bl9anda26aakh5b00maseh2t@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:34:45 -0800, miguel wrote:
>
>>Krammerhead wrote:
>>
>>>SPIDERMAN wrote:
>>>> despite what you feel about him personally, i would be inclined to
>>>> agree.
>>>> you shouldn't be able to win a game on what is, essentially, failure.
>>
>>>You are not automatically given a point for missing a field goal in the
>>>CFL anyway. If you are going to argue about the rules you should at
>>>least know then. Secondly if that is going to be an argument isn't
>>>kicking a field goal essentially a chance at a reward for failing to
>>>score a touchdown?
>>
>>Could you explain the rule? I think somebody told me it's called a
>>Rube. Why would you name something a Rube? Anyway when you kick a
>>field goal at least you have to get the ball between the uprights.
>>The single point failure rule doesn't require any skill except kicking
>>hard, does it? Where the hell is the skill in that? Any soccer player
>>could do that.
>
> Rouge. Old term - originally there were plays that subtracted off the
> team score. A team could have a negative total - "in the red". They
> changed that, but the name stuck.
>
> It's not so much a single rule as a philosophy that covers a bunch of
> situations.
>
> To keep it simple, forget all the out-of-bounds stuff. The division
> line is the kicking game - the NFL has a dead-ball philosophy and the
> CFL has a live-ball philosophy.
>
> In the NFL, there's the fair catch on punts and the dead ball on a
> missed field goal; punts into the end-zone are pretty much automatic
> (no downside).
>
> In the CFL there's no fair catch and after a punt or an unsuccessful
> field goal attempt, the ball is live. Punt returns are more
> challenging - guys can get flattened: the kicking team has to allow 5
> yards from the ball but sometimes they 'forget'. On punts into the
> end-zone and missed field goals, there's more excitement trying to run
> it out ... or even kicking it back out to avoid 'giving up the point'.
>
> Partly because of the extra point variations, there's more
> decision-making and more wild finishes. Special-teams play takes on a
> different dimension in the CFL - 3 downs, live ball, 50% large playing
> area, more point variations). The CFL is the "anything can happen"
> league.
>
> If you're switching eyes from the CFL to the NFL, it can look slow and
> constrained. If you're switching eyes from the NFL to CFL, it can
> look chaotic and spread out.

Owl, you are wasting your time responding logically to this idiot. In case
you didn't know "miguel" is one of "Admiral/Captian Canader's" butt licking
sidekicks. Every once and awhile they stick their heads out from soc.singles
where they normally reside in their own filth, and spew forth this rehashed
garbage.

From:	owl
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:54:38 -0500

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:06:25 -0500, "Agent Smith" wrote:

>Owl, you are wasting your time responding logically to this idiot. In case
>you didn't know "miguel" is one of "Admiral/Captian Canader's" butt licking
>sidekicks. Every once and awhile they stick their heads out from soc.singles
>where they normally reside in their own filth, and spew forth this rehashed
>garbage.

"You don't know the power of the Dark Side."

From:	miguel
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:35:07 -0800

owl wrote:
>"Agent Smith," JACKASS, wrote:

>>Owl, you are wasting your time responding logically to this idiot. In case
>>you didn't know "miguel" is one of "Admiral/Captian Canader's" butt licking
>>sidekicks. Every once and awhile they stick their heads out from soc.singles
>>where they normally reside in their own filth, and spew forth this rehashed
>>garbage.

>"You don't know the power of the Dark Side."

You get one point for being a jedi failure.

miguel

From:	Ynot Anner
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:10:06 -0700

On 23 Jan 2005 10:19:50 -0800, richardhead@beer.com (Admiral Canader)
wrote:

>What you won't see today is he New England Patriots winning by
>failure-ie getting a point for missing a field goal.
>
>
>The Patriots have won their championships on good field goas.
>
>the cfl rewards failure by giving a point for missing a field goal.
>
>
>Should 33% of a run be given for foul balls that have the distance?
>
>Should 33% of a point be given in basketball for hiting the rim?
>
>
>the cfl is a failure
>
>the cfl single point failure rule is ridiculous
>
>
>HTH
Q: What the hell does the CFL have to do with the Patriots vs
Steelers game?

From:	Agent Smith
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:53:40 -0500

"Ynot Anner" wrote in message
news:nit7v0hnakk6g689do4nkaipn00n8sgh43@4ax.com...
> On 23 Jan 2005 10:19:50 -0800, richardhead@beer.com (Admiral Canader)
> wrote:
>
>>What you won't see today is he New England Patriots winning by
>>failure-ie getting a point for missing a field goal.
>>
>>
>>The Patriots have won their championships on good field goas.
>>
>>the cfl rewards failure by giving a point for missing a field goal.
>>
>>
>>Should 33% of a run be given for foul balls that have the distance?
>>
>>Should 33% of a point be given in basketball for hiting the rim?
>>
>>
>>the cfl is a failure
>>
>>the cfl single point failure rule is ridiculous
>>
>>
>>HTH
> Q: What the hell does the CFL have to do with the Patriots vs
> Steelers game?

Nothing, to normal, logical people like you and I. But to a desperate
pathetic troll, they have everything to do with each other. You see the
Admiral releases his ual tensions and feeling of inadequacies by trolling
the CFL newsgroup by trying to belittle a Canadian football rule. He
compares the rule to a reward for failure, which is really just a desperate
cry for help and an attempt to cover up his own failures.

HTH

From:	Wally
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:50:40 -0500

Ynot Anner wrote in message: news:
> Q: What the hell does the CFL have to do with the Patriots vs
> Steelers game?
>
>
Nothing, but the imbecile who posted this crap and other garbage was dropped on
his head as a child and never recovered. He has just enough brain power to
allow him to breathe, digest food and defecate. He's borderline.

From:	owl
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:15:17 -0500

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:50:40 -0500, Wally
wrote:

>Ynot Anner wrote in message: news:
>> Q: What the hell does the CFL have to do with the Patriots vs
>> Steelers game?
>>
>>
>Nothing, but the imbecile who posted this crap and other garbage was dropped on
>his head as a child and never recovered. He has just enough brain power to
>allow him to breathe, digest food and defecate. He's borderline.

Lack of defecation seems to be part of his problem.

From:	Agent Smith
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:00:45 -0500

"owl" wrote in message
news:5d88v09c4an4tkmegfg63r7877r9vev6k5@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:50:40 -0500, Wally
> wrote:
>
>>Ynot Anner wrote in message:
>>news:
>>> Q: What the hell does the CFL have to do with the Patriots vs
>>> Steelers game?
>>>
>>>
>>Nothing, but the imbecile who posted this crap and other garbage was
>>dropped on
>>his head as a child and never recovered. He has just enough brain power
>>to
>>allow him to breathe, digest food and defecate. He's borderline.
>
> Lack of defecation seems to be part of his problem.

But he has been defecating on Usenet for years....

From:	Glen Hallick
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:55:44 -0600

A boring troll that has been done over and over. It just demonstrates your
limited intelligence. That would also explain why you posted at
soc.culture.usa, alt.sports.baseball.ny-yankees, and soc.singles. What these
newsgroups have to do withthe CFL, I supposed some one facing several years
of pimples on his face can answer.

Glen

"Admiral Canader" wrote in message
news:2d80ca8c.0501231019.9aa80f0@posting.google.com...
> What you won't see today is he New England Patriots winning by
> failure-ie getting a point for missing a field goal.
>
>
> The Patriots have won their championships on good field goas.
>
> the cfl rewards failure by giving a point for missing a field goal.
>
>
> Should 33% of a run be given for foul balls that have the distance?
>
> Should 33% of a point be given in basketball for hiting the rim?
>
>
> the cfl is a failure
>
> the cfl single point failure rule is ridiculous
>
>
> HTH

From:	Brian
Subject:	Re: Patriots Steelers game
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:56:57 -0500

right

"Admiral Canader" wrote in message
news:2d80ca8c.0501231019.9aa80f0@posting.google.com...
> What you won't see today is he New England Patriots winning by
> failure-ie getting a point for missing a field goal.
>
>
> The Patriots have won their championships on good field goas.
>
> the cfl rewards failure by giving a point for missing a field goal.
>
>
> Should 33% of a run be given for foul balls that have the distance?
>
> Should 33% of a point be given in basketball for hiting the rim?
>
>
> the cfl is a failure
>
> the cfl single point failure rule is ridiculous
>
>
> HTH