This article is better-written in part because it tells who Mads Ravn is in his academic capacity and what his role is for the team. What does the reader think of the article? Are there too many of Ravn's personal opinions that he expresses while the views of other archaeologists are not mentioned concerning the Vanuatuans up to 3000 years ago. David Christainsen Other posts:
• Provocative question - What Archaeological evidence would persuade
you that God exists, and the Bible is real?
• Modern Behavior of Early Humans Found Half-Million Years Earlier Than Thought • c1565 failed Spanish settlement in North Carolina • 2009's top 10 most exciting discoveries in archaeology • Archaeologists to explore feasting habits of ancient builders of Stonehenge • Until I investigated carefully, I did not know that Vanuatuans set sail further out in the Pacific Ocean again, heading eventually for the Easter Islands • FIRST CONTACT 2009 REAL MASS UFO FLEETS WORLDWIDE (NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2009 ) • Dillehay on First American studies or relevant South American studies • Dillehay • PhD Studentship in Biomolecular Archaeology of Wine • The Origins of Tidiness |