ripples? in 2.71K blackbody cosmic microwave radiation #193 Atom Totality theory

Subject:	ripples? in 2.71K blackbody cosmic microwave radiation #193 Atom Totality theory
Date:	Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:38:32 -0800 (PST)

Some more information from 2nd ed to this 3rd ed
of the book concerning CMBR of 2.71K.

-------
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.physics
Subject: non-Gaussian microwave radiation of universe
and Atom Totality
Date: 6 Nov 1998 03:31:30 GMT

The below new information on the cosmic microwave
background
radiation, CMBR, is consistent with the Atom Totality
theory in that the
observable universe is the last 6 electrons of 231Pu,
thus the 6
electron spaces in the 5f6 makes for this uniformity
of MWR, rather
than the randomness that the Big Bang and inflation
theories imply.
--- quoting in parts NEW SCIENTIST, 31 October 1998
---
A strange pattern in the cosmic background radiation,
the lingering
afterglow of the big bang, may shake cosmology to its
roots by
undermining a theory called inflation. This says that
the young
Universe went through a momentary phase of superfast
expansion.
David Valls-Gabaud of CNRS, the French national
scientific research
agency in Strasbourg, and his colleagues found the odd
feature in a sky
map built up by NASA's Cosmic Background Explorer
(COBE) satellite...
The map shows ripples--variations in the wavelength
or "temperature"
of the radiation around the average of 2.726 kelvin.
These hot and cold
spots represent ...
Taken together, inflation and CDM predict that the
hot and cold spots
discovered by COBE should be in a random distribution
known as a
Gaussian distribution. But Valls-Gabaud and his
colleagues found that
there is a large region of the sky near the north pole
of our Galaxy
where they are non-Gaussian. "It was a massive
surprise," says
Valls-Gabaud.
Valls-Gabaud says his team found the anomaly because
they used a
technique called wavelet analysis, which no one else
has tried. But
some researchers remain unconvinced that the
non-Gaussian feature
exists. "Other groups have looked hard and failed to
find such
effects," says Martin Rees of the University of
Cambridge.
Valls-Gabaud is not sure what caused the anomaly. It
could be a local
source of radiation in the sky, perhaps glowing dust
surrounding our
Galaxy. "But any such source would have to be very
large."
Or perhaps the clumps were not made by inflation and
CDM. "One idea is
that they were made by textures, a three-dimensional
network of cracks
in space," Valls-Gabaud says. Such cracks would
produce a non-random
distribution of hot and cold spots. "It would
undermine inflation and
cold dark matter," he says.
Rees agrees that if the non-randomness exists, it
could support a
texture model. He believes, however, that the theory
emphasising the
role of inflation and CDM could be salvaged by
combining these two
phenomena with the texture model.
Valls-Gabaud's results will be published next month
in the journal
Physical Review Letters.
--- end quoting in parts NEW SCIENTIST, 31 October
1998 ---

-------
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Newsgroups: soc.history.science,sci.astro,sci.physics
Subject: Atom Totality predicts regarding satellite
soon to measure Cosmos
Date: 8 May 1999 07:39:24 GMT

In article... Archimedes Plutonium writes:

> You see, they will be going on 3 falsehoods, that
of big bang,
> either/or, and CMBR and with these three falsehoods
they will arrive at
> a fake conclusion.

What the Atom Totality predicts concerning the soon to
be launched
satellite.

The Atom Totality theory predicts that the Cosmic
Microwave Background
Radiation CMBR is infinitely smooth, because the
Cosmos is the inside
of 231Pu and that CMBR is blackbody because only the
inside of an atom
is blackbody. And that any reported ripples or
fluctuations are caused
by the measuring devices that have reached their limit
of precision.
And that the measurement of CMBR by more accurate and
precise
instruments will always show different patterns of
CMBR fluctuations.
There are no perfect instruments, only better
instruments, and thus,
all instruments will show some ripples. But these
ripples do not exist
in the cosmos, but rather these ripples exist because
the instruments
are not good enough to go down further into the
"infinitely smooth
blackbody radiation that is CMBR".
So far, the scientists who have measured CMBR, have
never reported to
the world public whether their patterns of CMBR
fluctuations are the
same or different from that of another scientist group
who measured
CMBR. If 3 independent groups of scientists measured
CMBR and all 3
reported different patterns of CMBR ripples. Then my
case is supported
and proved.

Ever since Smoot reported ripples (when was it
1994??) there has been
a hush hush about CMBR. The other groups that have
measured CMBR, do
their results match the patterns of ripples as
reported by Smoot? You
see, if ripples are genuine, then the patterns of
ripples should match.
But I suspect that the patterns of ripples as reported
by different
groups of scientists never matches and this is the
reason behind all
the hush-hush over CMBR

However, since the 3 groups may be using the same
instruments, the
patterns may come out almost the same. That would not
disprove my
contentions however, if one of the 3 groups used more
precise
intrumentation and came up with the same patterns as
the other two
groups, then that would disprove my contentions. But
more precise
instrumentation usually takes decades with newer
technologies. And so,
I suspect we have to wait, and that in 10 or 20 years
from now with
instruments that are capable of measuring the CMBR
that goes far beyond
current precision of instruments, to see if the
ripples are indeed a
result of the instruments or that the ripples are an
intrinsic physical
feature of the universe itself.

So, the Atom Totality predicts CMBR is infinitely
smooth, or as smooth
as what the blackbody radiation inside an atom is
smooth. Perhaps
blackbody radiation inside atoms is not smooth. I do
not know the
latest wisdom on atomic blackbody radiation and
whether it is
infinitely smooth or not? My intuition says that QM
blackbody radiation
is infinitely smooth. Perhaps a QM physicist can shed
light on the
accepted wisdom.
-------

Well the above is pretty much excellent evidence in favor of the
Atom Totality theory. That the cosmic microwave blackbody
radiation is a result of the Cosmos as the inside of an electrons
cavity of the 5f6 cavity.

It not only explains why microwave is blackbody and of temperature
of 2.71 Kelvin but also explains Olbers dark night sky problem
as being dark because that is what blackbody is (for it is not
whitebody).

Olbers paradox as to why the Night Sky is dark

I am going to combine the 2.71 K microwave background radiation that
is blackbody with the Olber's paradox because both are essentially
data on a blackbody cavity which in the case of the Universe is the
5f6 electron shell of the 231Pu Atom Totality.

Now I chose the thermodynamic of microwave radiation as a slightly
better evidence in proof of the Atom Totality over the Big Bang
compared
to the Missing Mass problem which I rated as slightly below the
2.71 thermodynamic. Why did I rate the 2.71 K thermodynamic as
superior evidence to the Missing Mass? Well it is because we cannot
know to a high degree of precision as to how much Missing Mass there
really is. The Missing Mass of the Cosmos range from 70 percent to
that of 99 percent. Whereas the microwave blackbody radiation is very
precise and narrow of 2.71 Kelvin. So that is why I rate the
thermodynamic
evidence as stronger than the Missing Mass evidence.

Now since Olber's paradox of the Dark Night Sky is a result of the
observable universe is a blackbody cavity of the 5f6 electron shell of
231Pu and this blackbody cavity also causes the thermodynamic of 2.71
K, I have put these two pieces of evidence together.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies