1. CLIMATE CHANGE: WHICH SIDE IS BOB ON IN THE CLIMATE WAR? I=E2=80=99m getting a lot of mail asking where I stand on climate change.= You=E2=80=99re entitled to know. But first, I=E2=80=99ve gotta own up: I'm not a clima= te scientist. I rely on information gathered and interpreted by other scientists, everybody does. My source on climate is the Intergovernmenta= l Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) established by the United Nations in 1988,= soon after I began writing WN. Along with most scientists, I concluded that anthropogenic warming is real and dangerous; 20 years later I still do. If warming is caused by human activity, and we have taken no steps = to modify our behavior, the result will be catastrophic. A long-term soluti= on calls for two changes throughout society: higher efficiency and lower fertility. If warming turns out not to be caused by humans, we will stil= l have left our progeny with a better world. 2. CLIMATEGATE: WHAT ABOUT THE PEOPLE THAT DID THE HACKING? Last week someone broke into the e-mail files of the Climate Research Uni= t at the University of East Anglia, and posted the results on the web for t= he world to see. The Wall Street Journal and Investors Business Daily are having a field-day writing about "criminal conspiracy" and "scientific blacklisting." There were a few embarrassing comments about global warmi= ng deniers in a mountain of e-mails. I would hate to see some of my private= e- mails on the web. The suffix was added to invite comparisons to the infamous break-in at the Watergate Hotel by Nixon's goons, but in this story the unnamed burglars are treated as heroes. No one wrote even a line about what was probably the only criminal offense in this sordid affair: hacking into private files. There are angry demands in Congress for an investigation of the affair. So far the only effect has been to shift the focus away from bad news about rising oceans and stranded polar= bears to climate scientists more interested in scoring points than advancing science. All that's left is to figure out who paid for the bre= ak- in. That book has already been written. 3. FUEL : THE MOST IMPORTANT BOOK YOU HAVEN=E2=80=99T READ. When the ClimateGate story broke I immediately began digging through pile= s of paper on my desk to find my copy of "Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health," a 2008 book by Davi= d Michaels, an epidemiologist at the George Washington University School of= Public Health. When scientific evidence of a threat to public health becomes overwhelming, government intervention can still be delayed for years by simply manufacturing uncertainty. That's where of the global warming debate is right now. The fossil fuel industry is doing a job on = us. THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND. Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the University of Maryland, but they should be. --- Archives of What's New can be found at http://www.bobpark.org What's New is moving to a different listserver and our subscription process has changed. To change your subscription status please visit this link: http://listserv.umd.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=3Dbobparks-whatsnew&A=3D1 Other posts:
• "The 'Speedup' of the Universe's Expansion at Extreme Distances"
• How video projectors work! • Quantum Gravity 347.2: A Relationship Between Probable Correlation P(A<-->B) of PI and Statistical Dependence (Lehmann) Via The Complex Field • Chink found in armor of perfect cloak • Prof Ian Plimer: tenets of a climate change sceptic • =?UTF-8?B?V0hBVOKAmVMgTkVXICAgUm9iZXJ0IEwuIFBhcmsgICAgRnJpZGF5LCA=?= =?UTF-8?B?NCBEZWMgMDkgICBXYXNoaW5ndG9uLCBEQw==?= • i dedanoe want my grandfather's Pandovina back • Quantum Gravity 347.1: An Anti-Planck "Anti-Anthropic" Principle and Taiwan Advances GR Thermodynamics • design a crucible scoop shovel #36 Earth's Energy Future • Quantum Gravity 347.0: Italy Relates Symmetries of a Quantum System to Geometry, Algebra, and Analysis (Latter includes Probability!) • ripples? in 2.71K blackbody cosmic microwave radiation #193 Atom Totality theory |