How wars are made over the top of dumb gentiles, dumb little states like England?Was Mel Gibson right???

Subject:	How wars are made over the top of dumb gentiles, dumb little states like England?Was Mel Gibson right???
Date:	Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:52:53 GMT

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/nameless/6.shtml

Back to HOW WARS ARE MADE | Issues index | CDR Home

The Nameless War

CHAPTER 6

1933: JEWRY DECLARES WAR

The English edition of Mein Kampf was still in the process of printing
and publication when Jewry declared war on the national Socialist regime,
and started an intensive blockade against Germany.

The International Jewish Boycott Conference was assembled in Holland in
the summer of 1933 under the Presidency of Mr. Samuel Untermeyer, of the
U.S.A., who was elected President of the World Jewish Economic Federation
formed to combat the opposition to Jews in Germany.

On his return to the U.S.A., Mr. Untermeyer gave an address over
Station W.A.B.C., the text of which, as printed in the New York Times of
August 7th, 1933, I have before me. Mr. Untermeyer referred in the opening
phrases to:

"The holy war in the cause of humanity in which we are embarked";

and proceeded to develop the subject at great length, describing the
Jews as the aristocrats of the world.

"Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in this
sacred war should do so now and here."

Those Jews who did not join in he denounced, declaring:

"They are traitors to their race."

In January 1934 Mr. Jabotinsky, founder of Revisionist Zionism, wrote
in Natcha Retch:

"The fight against Germany has been carried out for months by every Jewish
community, conference, trade organisation, by every Jew in the world . . .
we shall let loose a spiritual and a material war of the whole world against
Germany."

This is perhaps the most confident assertion extant on the Jewish
claim, set out in the Protocols of Zion, that they can bring about war.
Protocol Number 7 states:

"We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by a State
by war with its neighbour. If these should venture to stand collectively, by
universal war."

[Like the neverendingwar on "terror" today]

It should be remembered here that a copy of these Protocols was filed
in the British Museum in 1906.

By 1938 the Jewish war was in full swing; and already through their
influence or pressure many Gentile persons and groups were being drawn into
the vortex. Various members of the British Socialist Party were openly
advocating joining in this cold war; and a vigorous and uncompromising
clique was growing in all Parties under the leadership of Messrs. Churchill,
Amery, Duff, Cooper and others.

"Hitler will have no war, but he will be forced to it, not this year, but
later on,"

screamed the Jew Emil Ludwig in the June copy of Les Aniles 1934.

On June 3rd, 1938, matters were carried a long step further by an
article in the American Hebrew, the weekly organ of American Jewry. This
article, which opened by showing that Hitler never deviated from his Mein
Kampf doctrine, went on to threaten the direst retaliation.

"It has become patent that a combination of Britain, France and Russia will
sooner or later bar the triumphant march (of Hitler) . . .

Either by accident or design, a Jew has come to a position of foremost
importance in each of these nations. In the hands of non-Aryans lies the
fate and the very lives of millions . . .

In France the Jew of prominence is Leon Blum . . . Leon Blum may yet be the
Moses who will lead . . .

Maxim Litvinoff, Soviet super salesman, is the Jew who sits at the right
hand of Stalin, the little tin soldier of communism . . .

The English Jew of prominence is Leslie Hore-Belisha, Tommy Atkins' new
boss."

Later in this article we read:

"So it may come to pass that these three sons of Israel will form the
combine that will send the frenzied Nazi dictator to hell. And when the
smoke of battle clears ... and the man who played the swastikaed Christus .
. . is lowered into a hole in the ground . . . as the trio of non-Aryans
intone a ramified requiem . . .

a medley of the marseillaise, God Save the King, and the Internationale,
blending with a proud and aggressive rendering of Eli Eli."

Two points in the above extract are worthy of special note. Firstly, it
is taken for granted that these three Jews will not for one moment think or
act as anything but Jews; and can be relied upon to guide their Gentile
dupes to ruin in a plainly Jewish war; secondly, should be noted the
contemptuous reference to the "swastikaed Christus," which Jewry looks
forward to burying; and which reveals by its classification the Jewish
hatred of Christianity.

Meantime Jewish pressure was exerted to the utmost to incite clashes
between Sudeten, Czechs, Poles and Germans.

By September of 1938 matters had reached a desperate pass. Mr.
Chamberlain himself flew out to Munich and achieved the historic settlement
with Hitler. It seemed as though the war mongers had been frustrated, and
Europe saved. Rarely had such scenes and evidences of spontaneous delight
and thankfulness been evoked as were witnessed throughout Britain and Europe
at that triumph.

Those who knew the power of the enemy, however, knew that Mr
Chamberlain's work was certain to be swiftly sabotaged. I remember
remarking, on the very evening of his return from Munich, that within a week
every newspaper in this country and the war mongers in Parliament, would be
attacking Mr. Chamberlain for having secured peace; regardless of the fact
that in so doing they were contemptuously flouting the real wishes of the
people. This remark was only too true, as events proved.

Nowhere was the Jewish fury so obvious, of course, as in Moscow. I have
before me a leaflet of my own designing put out in October 1938. It runs:

"Are you aware that Mr. Chamberlain was burnt in effigy in Moscow as soon as
it was known that he had secured peace;

Showing very clearly Who Wanted War, and who are still ceaselessly working
to stir up strife all the world over." * See Appendix 4.

The attempt to provoke war over Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia having
failed, there remained only the detonator in the Polish Corridor, that
monstrosity born of the unholy Versailles Conference, and denounced by
honest men from Marshal Foch and Arthur Henderson, from that time onwards.

One feature about the Versailles Conference has been kept secret by
those who possess the power to keep things from the public or to proclaim
things from the house tops. It is this:

All important decisions were taken by the "Big Four" - Britain, France,
Italy and the U.S.A., represented respectively by Mr. Lloyd George, M.
Clemencau, Baron Sonino and President Wilson. So much is known. What is not
known is that:

the secretary of Mr. Lloyd George was the Jew Sassoon;

of M. Clemencau the Jew Mandel Rothschild, now known as Mandel;

Baron Sonino was himself half a Jew: and President Wilson had the Jew
Brandeis;

the interpreter was another Jew named Mantoux; and

the Military Adviser yet another Jew called Kish.

It is known that Mr. Lloyd George and others were hazy about geography.
Their Jewish secretaries, however, were on the contrary very much on the
spot on such matters. These Jews met at 6 p.m. in the evenings; and mapped
out the decisions for the following day's conference of the "Big Four."

The results were disastrous from the point of view of all decent
people, who hoped for an honourable treaty, with terms which, though they
might be stringent, would at least be just and thereby secure lasting peace.

Foch himself loudly denounced the treaty; declaring that it contained
the certain makings of another war and deprecating in particular the
provision relating to Danzig and the Corridor.

Arthur Henderson and many public men joined in the denunciation; but
all to no avail. From the point of view of men planning another war,
however, nothing could have been better than this treaty.

All sorts of glaring injustices were ingrained in its text. In addition
to the Corridor, and the position at Danzig, a bastard State was brought
into being, in which Germans, Slovaks, etc., together forming a majority of
the country, were put under the tyrannical control of the Czech minority, an
element which had thrown in its lot with the bolshevik Jews and fought
against the Allies in 1918.

The design of this State was such geographically that it was styled,
and correctly styled, a dagger pointed at the heart of Germany. It received
the outlandish name of Czechoslovakia.

The whole of the industrial life from the huge Skoda arsenal downwards
was controlled by Jewish banking interests; while we have it on the evidence
of Lord Winterton that practically all the land was mortgaged to the Jews
(Hansard, October 1936).

Under this Messianic domination were enslaved huge sections of
populations, belonging to other nations, henceforward condemned to be held
down by force until some country should grow strong enough to champion them.

This eventuality was, in my opinion, visualised and actually fostered
as we know by the huge loans to Germany from international banking
interests.

Let it not be forgotten that while Jewish bankers were pouring money
into Germany which was rebuilding the Wehrmacht on a bigger scale than ever,
a colossal campaign for peace and disarmament was launched in this country.
This not only succeeded in substantially disarming us; but in creating an
atmosphere in which Mr. Baldwin had to admit that he dared not go to the
country asking for more armaments, vital though he knew our needs in sea,
air and land forces to be. * All prior of course to the rise of Hitler.

To anyone who made a study of the personalities and powers behind this
so-called peace propaganda, as I did, there can be no doubt as to whence the
real drive and finance emanated.

To anyone appreciating the attitude of the press at that time, and
realising that had this disarmament propaganda been distasteful to those who
influence our publicity services, there would have blared forth a torrent of
invective against our "peace ballotters"; there is additional proof that
this campaign had the support of international Jewry, as had the rearmament
of Germany. But why? the simple will ask.

The answer is fairly simple, if once the purpose behind the Jewish plan
is understood.

"Out of the last war we brought the Soviet States of Russia; out of the next
war we will bring the Soviet States of Europe. . ."

had been the pronouncement at a world meeting of communist parties about
1932. To make the next war possible, therefore, the see-saw must be balanced
again; German strength built up, and British strength whittled down.

Then the Europeans can fight each other to the death of one and
complete exhaustion of the other.

A dramatic surprise is in store for both sides. Neither is to be the
real winner. The real winner is quite a different army. This army is the one
that will receive the real attention. For 25 years it will be built up under
conditions of the greatest secrecy. Its leaders will not show their strength
until the conflict is well under way.

Not until a critical moment in the war will the European armies be
permitted to guess at the existence of the huge factories beyond the Urals,
or of the colossal proportions of the heavily mechanised hordes which will
then commence to roll westwards over Europe under the red flag of Marxism.

[Note: These "huge factories" and "colossal proportions of the heavily
mechanised hords" are thanks to the American people, via the Lend Lease Act,
implemented before Americans were sucked into that war, and minutely
detailed in the Diaries of Major Jordan (George Racey Jordan).- Jackie]

In March 1939 a British guarantee to Poland was given by Mr.
Chamberlain on the strength of a false report to the effect that a 48-hour
ultimatum had been delivered by Germany to the Poles.

This report subsequently turned out to be quite untrue.

The guarantee had been given, however, and the decision of peace or war
was now no longer in British hands. Jewry had the ball at its feet. Can we
doubt but that Poland was encouraged to ignore the German note of March
which set forth eminently reasonable suggestions for a peaceful solution of
the problem of the Corridor?

[Note: See Appendix 6 (we've added) for the Internet readers of this book;
information from the German White Book that correlates with Captain Ramsey's
statements here. -j]

Month after month no reply was vouchsafed by Poland to the German note.
Meanwhile, insult and outrage occurred with suspicious frequency all along
the German frontier, similar to the technique to which the Jews later
introduced the British in Palestine.

Day after day the British public was deluged with war propaganda and
misrepresentation of the situation. Finally their minds were closed against
any further regard to the demands of justice or reason by a new slogan,

"You cannot trust Hitler's word."

With this lie the British public was finally stampeded into throwing
all reason and judgment to the winds and accepting at their face value the
war propaganda in the press.

This slogan was founded upon a misrepresentation of Hitler's assurance
given on more than one occasion after a "putsch" such as that into
Sudetenland, that he "intended to make no further demands."

The misrepresentation lay in the fact that the press steadily obscured
the major fact, that the "demands" to which Hitler referred were all along
five fold in character; and covered those five areas taken from Germany by a
dictated peace in which the population was overwhelmingly German, i.e.
Sudetenland, part of Czechoslovakia, parts of Poland, the Corridor and
Danzig.

As German troops occupied each successive section, it is, I believe,
accurate to say that Hitler declared, that he had no additional demands to
make. But here it must be clearly stated in the interests of justice that he
never said that this entailed reducing the demands which he had originally
very clearly delineated, and repeated on many occasions, namely, the five
areas in question.

The British public was deluded by its press into supposing that when
Hitler said he had no further demands, that there had never been any
statement of his full demands, some of which were still unfulfilled. They
were led to believe that Hitler either never had any other demands, or that
he had abandoned the rest as soon as he had obtained some of them.

When, therefore, the next installment was added, the press built on
this misunderstanding the fallacy that Hitler's word could not be trusted.
Honest dealing needs no such trickery and deception. Such methods are only
necessary to bolster up bad or unjust causes.

Fortunately we have the calm and dispassionate judgment in this matter
by no less a person than the late Lord Lothian, recently British Ambassador
to the U.S.A. In his last speech at Chatham House on this subject he
remarked:

"If the principle of self-determination had been applied in Germany's
favour, as it was applied against her, it would have meant the return of
Sudetenland, Czechoslovakia, parts of Poland, the Polish Corridor, and
Danzig to the Reich."

Here is a very different presentment of the case to the one which was
foisted upon the British public in 1939; and it is the true one. Small
wonder that these facts had to be withheld from the ordinary citizen.

Had the British public realised the truth, that each of these demands
of Hitler's rested on a foundation of reasonable fairness, the people of
this island would have ruled out any question of war; and it was war, not
truth or justice, upon which international Jewry was resolved.

Next - Chapter 7 http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/nameless/7.htm

Back to HOW WARS ARE MADE | Issues index | CDR Home

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/ -
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/

http://www.sweetliberty.org/ -