> On Jan 8, 12:09 pm, ADR >... > > On Jan 8, 8:03 am, crunch > >... > > > Please follow the arguments I give very closely - > > > > 1 Peter 5:13 > > > ------------------ > > > > Papiashttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/qumran_origin/message/1919 > > > > "Eusebius approves of Papias when he confirms that =91the great and > > > mighty Peter=92 was in Rome in the reign of Claudius (AD 41-54), and > > > that Peter=92s teaching lay behind the gospel of Mark. Papias 'says t= hat > > > Peter mentions Mark in his first Epistle (1 Pet 5:13), and that he > > > composed this in Rome itself, which they say that he himself > > > indicates, referring to the city metaphorically as Babylon, in the > > > words "the elect one in Babylon greets you, and Marcus my son".'" > > > > So, please note Papias' use of "metaphorically as Babylon". > > > Yet, why does the writer of 1 Pet 5:13 use code? Does > > > the writer of 1 Pet 5:13 use the secret language of Zealots, > > > who wanted to use military means against Rome? > > > Who cares? Why is this at all important? Even in the unlikely case > > that certain zealot terms were used, why is this particularly > > important? One would have expected that people of the 1st century CE > > from Palestine would use expressions typical of their area and their > > period. > > Direct answer to your question - I am giving > an argument that shows that the writers of 1 Peter 5:13 > and Rev 17,18 used the same device as the writer of > CD 1: 5-10 as far as the use of codes by zealot nationalists > because of their underground activities. > > ----- > > Agrippa and Peterhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/qumran_origin/message/3498 > > "At a certain time Peter was in Rome, which he called by the pseudonym > "Babylon". > He had with him Silvanus (Silas) and "my son Mark", a symbolic son, > similarly to > "she who is at Babylon", a woman who sends greetings (1 Pet 5:12-13). > He wrote > the first epistle of Peter to Christians in the five Roman provinces > into which > Asia Minor (modern Turkey) was divided: Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, > Asia and > Bithynia. (1 Peter 1:1)." > > ----- > > Judas the Galilean and the Wrathhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/qumran_orig= in/message/533 > > "In view of the specificity with which the term 'Wrath' is used, I > suggest that it had become a name, equivalent to 'the Occupation'. AD > 6 was the 'Period of Wrath' because it was the date when the > Occupation began, when the native rulers were abolished and the > country was brought under the direct rule of Roman governors. This, > according to Josephus, was the immediate cause of the uprising of > Judas the Galilean. > > As CD 1: 5-10 would show, nationalists with Judas had persuaded > themselves that this date was the Wrath because it was the beginning > of 390 years of Roman occupation, sent by God as a punishment for the > sins of Israel. They 'knew' this figure because they read Ezek 4:5 as > a prophecy referring to their time, consistently with their treatment > of the OT prophets in the pesharim. For the same reason, they > referred > in code to the Romans as 'Babylon', because they believed that the OT > Babylonians were equivalent to the Romans. They needed to use codes > because of their underground activities. The same device is used in > the NT, in 1 Peter 5:13 and Rev 18." > > ----- > > The Slavonic Josephushttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/qumran_origin/message/= 3269 > > "In the passage on the wonder-worker, the Slavonic version as now > known reads: "And there assembled unto him of ministers one hundred > and fifty, and a multitude of the people. Now when they saw his power, > that he accomplished whatsoever he would by a word, and when they had > made known to him their will, that he should enter into the city and > cut down the Roman troops and Pilate and rule over us, he disdained us > not (or, he heeded not)". Whichever version of the final phrase is > correct, it is a newly known fact that the Qumran community had given > themselves up to warfare against the Kittim, the Romans. The War > Scroll and the pesher on Habakkuk give full illustrations of their > terror of the Romans, a terror that was felt only after AD 6, with the > Occupation. (Attempts to date the militant phase earlier have been > dealt with in entries to our group.) At the same time, the DSS, > including those from the militant phase, show such close parallels > with Christian organisation and imagery that an objective scholar > cannot deny a connection. It has not been believed that Jesus would > have any dealings with militancy; but that fact must now be accepted. > The words quoted above are likely to be reliable. > > In the same passage he is said to have had 150 ministers. The Qumran > community were organised in 1000=92s, 100=92s, 50=92s and 10=92s. ( 11QT > 57:1-5)." > > So, Jesus Christ had dealings with militancy and > with zealots. > > >... > > I am snoozing already. Do you really care if a woman mentioned in > > Revelations is an actual person or not? I really do not care about > > (and most share this opinion) what was in the heated imagination of > > John the Theologian when he wrote this weird text. Is this important > > in anything significant? I would say no. For all I know (and of all > > you know), it may have been the girl next door who did not even looked > > at him while carousing with other men!!! Most of these guys were > > frustrated men!! We will ever know for sure? No!! So, Dr. Thiering > > may want to spin out a hundred other theories and they would be all as > > valid as the one above. It as all totally irrelevant. > >... > > Yet, Dr. Thiering says "John the Theologian" did NOT > write Rev 17,18. Please see - > > "Jesus of the Apocalypse" 1995, Transworld- Doubleday > by Dr. Barbara Thiering. >... Any questions? David Christainsen Newton, Mass. USA Other posts:
• Were the disciples fishermen? / How and when the Gospels were written
• Jordan wants the Dead Sea Scrolls back from Israel • Qumran was an Essene monastery based on Broshi/Eshel review of Magness • Discussion of when DSS ToR lived on basis of 4Q171; what archaeologists should know • Nym-shift from Crunch to Meteorologist; What archaeologists should know about Essenes, be they at Qumran or not • Relation between DSS & NT is decisive for understanding that First Christians associated with Zealots • Carbondating to assess Christian connections to DSS • Vermes instructive for his errors / Doughty reviews Thiering / List of Thiering publications • Is the Bible true? Greek archaeologist offers insight, advice to Christians • Invitation to the reader to compare Magness/Thiering dating of Qumran sectarian origin • Pithy commentary on Thiering Thesis/Pesher |